CoP wrote:LegendOfSalmons wrote:Lol yeah those Bucks and 76ers team should have been a walk in the park right? What a foolish argument. All you did here was **** on the Raptors. By the way, those same teams would have beat this year's Celtics.
I never said they should have been a walk in the park. But if the 2019 playoff Raptors were as dominant as some are claiming, then why did it take them 7 vs. Philly, 6 vs. MIL, and then 6 vs. a severely hobbled GSW? Why did the .500 Magic take a game off them?
I'm simply asking for some kind of argument for why this 2019 Raptors team was historically dominant. The only response I've received thus far has been, "Numbers don't matter."
I already said in this thread that it would be a hell of a series between the two, largely because of the dominance of Kawhi and the grittiness of the rest of the team.
We've never claimed we're the most dominant team (by championship standards). We had a dominant Defense though.
The Heat are definitely better than Orlando. As for 'why did the .500 Magic take a game off them?' well why did the Cavs take a game off the Celtics, or better yet, why did the Raptors take 2 games off Cleveland?
The 76ers were actually legit contenders that year, if not for Kawhi, Embiid and hey maybe even Ben might be looked at vastly different right now.
The Bucks had an in their prime Middleton and close to peak Giannis. And obviously were a much more difficult matchup than Indy is.
As for the GSW, without KD but with Klay they are still a championship caliber team. The Rockets couldn't beat them. Once Klay went down, they were no longer a championship team.
Yes there's been luck on that run, as had with Boston's current run and the Bucks championship run.
Anyways, here's a school for thought, if this year Cavs can take a game off the Celtics, that Raptors team could take more no?
























