ATLTimekeeper wrote:Brown + 19 to Sac for Barnes + 13. Sac escapes the Barnes contract and holds onto Brown as an expiring in a big deadline deal swing.
That’s not a bad idea. The homer in me says they may trade for the 31 instead.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer
ATLTimekeeper wrote:Brown + 19 to Sac for Barnes + 13. Sac escapes the Barnes contract and holds onto Brown as an expiring in a big deadline deal swing.
ConSarnit wrote:Mr.Raptorsingh wrote:ATLTimekeeper wrote:Brown + 19 to Sac for Barnes + 13. Sac escapes the Barnes contract and holds onto Brown as an expiring in a big deadline deal swing.
This one could work.
I don’t know why SAC does it? Barnes is a solid starter who defends and hits 3s. He makes around $18m a season. He’s more valuable than Brown so SAC, a team that wants to make the playoffs, trades for a worse player and they move down in the draft? Doesn’t make a lot of sense.
djsunyc wrote:Boselecta wrote:Mr.Raptorsingh wrote:
And the dude they are presumably targeting (Edey) is blocked by the dude they traded the lottery pick for (Poeltl)
Really cant make this upthe league is probably as open as its ever been but we are so far away.
but you guys just did make it up. koc is not a source nor did he say the raptors are trying to trade back into the lottery. you've also made up targets, etc and what we are trying to trade.
ConSarnit wrote:Duffman100 wrote:ill-Will03 wrote:
Ya I wouldn’t be too happy about that honestly.
For me it would be Brown and the 19th
or
Poeltl and the 31st.
In an ideal world:
Kennard + flotsam + 9
for
Poeltl + 31
-soft reset on the Poeltl trade
-get our draft target at #9
-take step back next year to get top 5 pick
-possibly address C of the future with 9/19 or ‘25 1st
-if we still desire a somewhat competent C then overpay Goga Bitadze at 2/20. He looked solid in ORL this past season but got pushed out of the rotation behind WCJ and Isaac
I agree that I probably wouldn’t want to give up 19 to get to 9 but there are possible downstream upsides like making our 2025 pick better by getting rid of Poeltl. Basically it’s Poeltl, 19th and 10th (‘25 1st) vs 9 and top 5 in ‘25. In a vacuum it’s not terrible considering moving from 19 > 9 probably costs another pick between 17-23 (which is probably Poeltl’s value). If we have to take back salary that changes the equation though.
Jerry Lucas wrote:LOL at everyone saying Masai would never make a move like this because he's never done it before.
Giannis literally would have been a Toronto Raptor if Steven Adams didn't drop to OKC's pick.
Clutch0z24 wrote:Alot think if we trade up its for Edey...I don't think thats the reason we would be trading up though....Edey is a 15-25 projected atm...We wouldn't need to move up that high to get Edey....
Knowing Masai track record and players he likes to target Salaun makes the most logical sense...I actually like Edey but the chances Masai trying to move into the top 10 to draft him makes little sense to me.
RoteSchroder wrote:Clutch0z24 wrote:Alot think if we trade up its for Edey...I don't think thats the reason we would be trading up though....Edey is a 15-25 projected atm...We wouldn't need to move up that high to get Edey....
Knowing Masai track record and players he likes to target Salaun makes the most logical sense...I actually like Edey but the chances Masai trying to move into the top 10 to draft him makes little sense to me.
mocks aren't always accurate
It would have to be for a brandon clarke and Zaire added too though. Another big and a young guy with potential added to the pick is fine with me. Even one of the 2. No problem there.Duffman100 wrote:Getting the #9 for Poeltl would be hilarious. We drop 1 pick for year and a half of Poeltl.
While thats not a bad ides for the offseason...Psubs wrote:PhilBlackson wrote:I could be wrong but I DON'T think it's for Edey.
We have a solid enough big man rotation, on the otherhand go listen to Masai's presser again, he states multiple times that a BIGGER wing is THE top of his list to improve the roster which imo means we're targeting...
TIDJANE SALUAN.
We've already scouted him on multiple occasions, his physical profile screams Masai prototype and he's the one kid you heard a couple weeks ago has skyrocketed up draft boards and many believe he's going top 10. POR hired Schmidtz and since then have taken on higher upside prospects (ie/ Shaedon & Scoot), they also already have 2 decent bigmen in place (Ayton, RGIII). They likely want to take a safer prospect with their own pick then secure Tidj to develop long term when they inevitably try to move Grant who doesn't fit the timeline of their young guys.
CLE is the only one who I don't think is in that race and is actually just trying to move up to secure a better PG prospect ie/ Dillingham or McCain, so that they can move on from Garland.
It's reported now so a late riser. It's gotta be Carlton Carrington, who rose from mid 2nd to early 2nd/late 1st. After the combine, he's potentially leaped ahead of #19.
Portland needs players and Boucher played at Oregon.![]()
#14 and Malcolm Brogdon for #19, Chris Boucher and Ochai Agbaji.
#14 Carlton Carrington (play a lot with the 905 in his 1st season)
Bruce Brown for Wiggins and Moody
PG IQ - Brogdon - JFL
SG Dick - Moody - Carrington
SF Barrett - Wiggins - McDaniels
PF Barnes - Wiggins/Olynyk
C Poeltl - Olynyk - Chomche
LoveMyRaps wrote:FO stands pat - crybabies out in full force
FO tries to trade up - crybabies out in full force
Merit wrote:ConSarnit wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
For me it would be Brown and the 19th
or
Poeltl and the 31st.
In an ideal world:
Kennard + flotsam + 9
for
Poeltl + 31
-soft reset on the Poeltl trade
-get our draft target at #9
-take step back next year to get top 5 pick
-possibly address C of the future with 9/19 or ‘25 1st
-if we still desire a somewhat competent C then overpay Goga Bitadze at 2/20. He looked solid in ORL this past season but got pushed out of the rotation behind WCJ and Isaac
I agree that I probably wouldn’t want to give up 19 to get to 9 but there are possible downstream upsides like making our 2025 pick better by getting rid of Poeltl. Basically it’s Poeltl, 19th and 10th (‘25 1st) vs 9 and top 5 in ‘25. In a vacuum it’s not terrible considering moving from 19 > 9 probably costs another pick between 17-23 (which is probably Poeltl’s value). If we have to take back salary that changes the equation though.
I think if we get Kennard/Clarke/Aldama for Jak we would be set in terms of depth across our roster. Clarke is still solid, and he’s also Canadian. Aldama imo is a decent rotational player. Kennard is our GTJ replacement. In this scenario we also move Bruce Brown and McDaniels for Wiggins. No picks.
IQ/
RJ/Kennard
Wiggins/Gradey
Scottie/Clarke
Aldama/
We still have Boucher and Kennard to trade at the deadline, plus the MLE, LLE, 9, 19.
Clutch0z24 wrote:Alot think if we trade up its for Edey...I don't think thats the reason we would be trading up though....Edey is a 15-25 projected atm...We wouldn't need to move up that high to get Edey....
Knowing Masai track record and players he likes to target Salaun makes the most logical sense...I actually like Edey but the chances Masai trying to move into the top 10 to draft him makes little sense to me.
canada_dry wrote:It would have to be for a brandon clarke and Zaire added too though. Another big and a young guy with potential added to the pick is fine with me. Even one of the 2. No problem there.Duffman100 wrote:Getting the #9 for Poeltl would be hilarious. We drop 1 pick for year and a half of Poeltl.
Poetl for 9+ garbage for contract purposes straight up is a lot less palatable.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
Clutch0z24 wrote:canada_dry wrote:It would have to be for a brandon clarke and Zaire added too though. Another big and a young guy with potential added to the pick is fine with me. Even one of the 2. No problem there.Duffman100 wrote:Getting the #9 for Poeltl would be hilarious. We drop 1 pick for year and a half of Poeltl.
Poetl for 9+ garbage for contract purposes straight up is a lot less palatable.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
Doubt we get anything extra from the Grizz for Yak....That would be a better package than what we got for all NBA Siakam.
Clutch0z24 wrote:RoteSchroder wrote:Clutch0z24 wrote:Alot think if we trade up its for Edey...I don't think thats the reason we would be trading up though....Edey is a 15-25 projected atm...We wouldn't need to move up that high to get Edey....
Knowing Masai track record and players he likes to target Salaun makes the most logical sense...I actually like Edey but the chances Masai trying to move into the top 10 to draft him makes little sense to me.
mocks aren't always accurate
Yep that is true but idk if Edey is the guy Masai is trading up for....Its not that i don't like Edey and wouldn't mind it i just look at Masai track record in guys he likes....Hes going for Salaun if i were to put my money on it.