Nazrmohamed wrote:mpharris36 wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:
That’s where the knicks are in tight spot. Brunson is a new star…..so the question what ‘older’ star will bow down.
NBA players stars have huge egos.
The problem is…young upcoming stars are hard to trade for.
Indeed but if a vet isn't willing to sacrifice to win probably should pass. .he's 34 and clippers aren't winning anything so if he wants to have an legit chance at a chip he will need to realize he isn't a #1.
If he can't come to the realization the Knicks will just look elsewhere. I think a while back they said the Knicks interest in PG last year was overblown.
I think they are looking for a player more on Brunsons timeline...but like you said someone in there prime or a younger players is much harder to trade for.
Does PG even think he's an alpha star at this point. Better yet, do we think he's that guy because I wouldn't trade for him under the assumption that he is. IMO he's about as good as Julius for maybe another 2 seasons and then sub from there. But I think he understands this and I do think he wants to win. He's just not in the Melo phase yet where in order to win, media and everybody is asking him to come off the bench for no reason. He's just saying he's not willing to relinquish all notions of him being a star and I don't have an issue with that. But yeah, he's gotta fit in with what we are doing.
From things like his Pod (not recent stuff), I don't think you'd run into an issue about alpha. Honestly, if the price is cheap, I'd consider it, but if I was a GM, I'm not sure how comfortable I'd be in paying him 45-50 mil per in his late 30's. This all moot, though, as I think this is mostly posturing.