MasterIchiro wrote:And Mitch is the shadow government that controls the deep state Hornets.

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop
MasterIchiro wrote:And Mitch is the shadow government that controls the deep state Hornets.

JDR720 wrote:I don't think Ingram is a big upgrade.
Sure, he's better in a vacuum. But Miles plays 75 games, Ingram plays 55.
I'd take the draft picks and the Clippers deal instead.
Ingram literally just got benched in the playoffs too.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Liver_Pooty wrote:Brandon Ingram is lazy. He was lazy at duke and has made a ton of money off ridiculous physical attributes. If he had any semblance of a heart he would be a top 10 player today. He was an utter disaster in the playoffs.
That being said if he was on a contract for another 2 or 3 years that wasn't terrible I'd absolutely make that trade. But he's not.
JustBuzzin wrote:Yall are crazy, if we can upgrade from Miles to Ingram you do it in a heartbeat.
Especially if it doesn't require multiple picks in a deal. As long as we have those future picks we can always trade Ingram + picks down the line. Ingram is just flat out better than Miles.
JustBuzzin wrote:Yall are crazy, if we can upgrade from Miles to Ingram you do it in a heartbeat.
Especially if it doesn't require multiple picks in a deal. As long as we have those future picks we can always trade Ingram + picks down the line. Ingram is just flat out better than Miles.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
We did it for Melo who plays less lolLiver_Pooty wrote:JustBuzzin wrote:Yall are crazy, if we can upgrade from Miles to Ingram you do it in a heartbeat.
Especially if it doesn't require multiple picks in a deal. As long as we have those future picks we can always trade Ingram + picks down the line. Ingram is just flat out better than Miles.
You okay paying 50 million for 20 5 and 5 and plays 50 games?
JustBuzzin wrote:We did it for Melo who plays less lolLiver_Pooty wrote:JustBuzzin wrote:Yall are crazy, if we can upgrade from Miles to Ingram you do it in a heartbeat.
Especially if it doesn't require multiple picks in a deal. As long as we have those future picks we can always trade Ingram + picks down the line. Ingram is just flat out better than Miles.
You okay paying 50 million for 20 5 and 5 and plays 50 games?
If the cost isn't that much sure why not?
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Somehow Ingram has made an all-star team being a 20/5/5 player...Liver_Pooty wrote:JustBuzzin wrote:We did it for Melo who plays less lolLiver_Pooty wrote:
You okay paying 50 million for 20 5 and 5 and plays 50 games?
If the cost isn't that much sure why not?
Because you gave to factor in Millers eventual deal and Mark if he pans out. Melo definitely isn't a 20 5 5 player when healthy.
JustBuzzin wrote:Somehow Ingram has made an all-star team being a 20/5/5 player...Liver_Pooty wrote:JustBuzzin wrote:We did it for Melo who plays less lol
If the cost isn't that much sure why not?
Because you gave to factor in Millers eventual deal and Mark if he pans out. Melo definitely isn't a 20 5 5 player when healthy.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.

Thr suns had 49 wins. Would be nice to get close to that. While being younger and a bit deeper with our own picks.JDR720 wrote:Even if you think Ingram is better than Miles and is worth trading for, he isn't a viable 3rd option here. He's not a defender, a passer or even that good a 3pt shooter.
If you want to build a "Big 3" then the 3rd guy needs to be versatile or really good at something, but Ingram projects as a worse Brandon Miller.
This is basically what the Suns did when they got Beal when they already had Booker. And Ingram, like Beal, gets hurt a bunch.

MugzZo wrote:Thr suns has 49 wins. Would be nice to get close to that. While being younger and a bit deeper with our own picks.JDR720 wrote:Even if you think Ingram is better than Miles and is worth trading for, he isn't a viable 3rd option here. He's not a defender, a passer or even that good a 3pt shooter.
If you want to build a "Big 3" then the 3rd guy needs to be versatile or really good at something, but Ingram projects as a worse Brandon Miller.
This is basically what the Suns did when they got Beal when they already had Booker. And Ingram, like Beal, gets hurt a bunch.
Sent from my SM-F936U using RealGM mobile app
JDR720 wrote:Even if you think Ingram is better than Miles and is worth trading for, he isn't a viable 3rd option here. .