
For anyone that’s looking for some fresh OG apparel
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23

Context wrote:Hes_On_Fire wrote:Paul Reed sucks and talked trash about us. Never forget. **** that herb.
If he sucks that one thing....He's suppose to talk trash about his opponent- that's confidence and team loyalty- thats what we want to see...

DOT wrote:Paul Reed is the best FA C on the market
Not ideal I don't think, but I don't see a better option without a trade.
BrOnXKing1 wrote:Precious is better than Reed. The question is when Robinson is out, someone will need to play 20-25 mins. Would you have Reed or Sims?
knicksstuff wrote:BigShot Bojan wrote:think we are still looking for a true backup pg….like a DSJknicksstuff wrote:
What move haven’t we made though ? The center position is the teams only need so unless they are shipping out Mitch for someone of equal contract value not sure what other big move is left to be made
There are no minutes for a player like him unless you don’t want McBride playing or taking minutes from DDV. They also just signed Kolek to the biggest second round contract ever

3toheadmelo wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:At this point I would take Paul Reed. He talked some **** but let bygones be bygones
?t=kUmFOXbSGnWZKwxHhsygSw&s=19
BrOnXKing1 wrote:Precious is better than Reed. The question is when Robinson is out, someone will need to play 20-25 mins. Would you have Reed or Sims?
Deeeez Knicks wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:At this point I would take Paul Reed. He talked some **** but let bygones be bygones
?t=kUmFOXbSGnWZKwxHhsygSw&s=19
Reed wasnt great but a lot of that is because when Reed is in the game, Embiid is on the bench. As a cheap 3rd C at this point he's fine


3toheadmelo wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
Reed wasnt great but a lot of that is because when Reed is in the game, Embiid is on the bench. As a cheap 3rd C at this point he's fine
No thanks, rather have Precious and Hurkporti over him. Rather roll with Hurkporti over Reed as 3rd stringer. Reed is not good enough to take mins away from hurkporti
Fat Kat wrote:

Deeeez Knicks wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:
Reed wasnt great but a lot of that is because when Reed is in the game, Embiid is on the bench. As a cheap 3rd C at this point he's fine
No thanks, rather have Precious and Hurkporti over him. Rather roll with Hurkporti over Reed as 3rd stringer. Reed is not good enough to take mins away from hurkporti
Reed would just be cheap insurance. If those guys are better and healthy then great. If Mitch gets hurt again and if Hurkporti is not ready then hes another body. We could use another big for depth with all the unknowns and he's available
Reed really wasn't bad.

