Deeeez Knicks wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:
Reed wasnt great but a lot of that is because when Reed is in the game, Embiid is on the bench. As a cheap 3rd C at this point he's fine
No thanks, rather have Precious and Hurkporti over him. Rather roll with Hurkporti over Reed as 3rd stringer. Reed is not good enough to take mins away from hurkporti
Reed would just be cheap insurance. If those guys are better and healthy then great. If Mitch gets hurt again and if Hurkporti is not ready then hes another body. We could use another big for depth with all the unknowns and he's available
Reed really wasn't bad.
Ive never seen Reed play but I figured he would be good insurance...my philosopy is if you can get starter vets to be your 13th to 15th man- then why not? thats how I would build my roster...

































