ImageImageImage

The Joe Ingles Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,126
And1: 4,607
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#61 » by wolves_89 » Fri Jul 5, 2024 5:56 am

I see the Ingles signing as a safety net to provide stability while some combination of Minott/Miller/Shannon transition to rotation roles. Hopefully, at least one of the prospects steps up to claim the Anderson minutes, but it's good to have Ingles available to fill any gaps during the learning process.
Guest84
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,811
And1: 878
Joined: Dec 13, 2017
 

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#62 » by Guest84 » Fri Jul 5, 2024 3:34 pm

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,350
And1: 22,775
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#63 » by Klomp » Fri Jul 5, 2024 8:48 pm

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Slim Tubby
Veteran
Posts: 2,916
And1: 2,536
Joined: Jun 03, 2017
         

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#64 » by Slim Tubby » Fri Jul 5, 2024 9:52 pm

wolves_89 wrote:I see the Ingles signing as a safety net to provide stability while some combination of Minott/Miller/Shannon transition to rotation roles. Hopefully, at least one of the prospects steps up to claim the Anderson minutes, but it's good to have Ingles available to fill any gaps during the learning process.
Excellent point. TSJ is ready IMO but we really need at least one of Miller or Minott to take that next step this season. Miller is more naturally talented so my money would be on him.

Sent from my N152DL using RealGM mobile app
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,350
And1: 22,775
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#65 » by Klomp » Fri Jul 5, 2024 11:14 pm

This was written early in the season last year, but still speaks to the kind of impact he had in Orlando.

To Mosley’s point, while Ingles’ individual numbers haven’t been overly impressive, the Magic have outscored opponents 12.3 points per 100 possessions this season with Ingles on the floor. Ingles has capably run the second unit offensively, freeing Cole Anthony to be more of a scorer off the bench, and helped communicate the realities of the NBA to a roster headlined by 21-year-old Paolo Banchero and 22-year-old Franz Wagner and an average age of 23.6 years old, outside of Ingles.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5056841/2023/11/14/joe-ingles-orlando-magic/
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#66 » by Nick K » Sat Jul 6, 2024 12:05 am

Slim Tubby wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:I see the Ingles signing as a safety net to provide stability while some combination of Minott/Miller/Shannon transition to rotation roles. Hopefully, at least one of the prospects steps up to claim the Anderson minutes, but it's good to have Ingles available to fill any gaps during the learning process.
Excellent point. TSJ is ready IMO but we really need at least one of Miller or Minott to take that next step this season. Miller is more naturally talented so my money would be on him.

Sent from my N152DL using RealGM mobile app


I think that's right. I haven't seen much from Minott except for athleticism. He's not a good shooter but he can get to the basket.....but has trouble finishing.

We need Miller at SF/PF to shoot and rebound. I give the nod to Miller. Big year for both of them.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,350
And1: 22,775
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#67 » by Klomp » Sat Jul 6, 2024 12:17 am

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,350
And1: 22,775
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#68 » by Klomp » Sat Jul 6, 2024 12:21 am

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,350
And1: 22,775
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#69 » by Klomp » Sun Jul 7, 2024 1:10 am

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
WolfAddict
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,463
And1: 2,153
Joined: Sep 18, 2019
Location: Canberra, Australia
     

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#70 » by WolfAddict » Mon Jul 8, 2024 1:26 am

Bit late to the party but.... HELL YES!!!!! Welcome to the pack mate!!! Aussie Aussie Aussie!! OI! OI! OI!
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,162
And1: 6,301
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#71 » by KGdaBom » Mon Jul 8, 2024 1:30 am

WolfAddict wrote:Bit late to the party but.... HELL YES!!!!! Welcome to the pack mate!!! Aussie Aussie Aussie!! OI! OI! OI!

:D :rockon:
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,350
And1: 22,775
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#72 » by Klomp » Mon Jul 8, 2024 1:41 am

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,232
And1: 5,803
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#73 » by winforlose » Mon Jul 8, 2024 2:21 am

Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


If this is true, then one or both of Minott or Miller is gonna ride the pine for much of the year. I get prioritizing winning over development at this stage of the franchise. But, if playing Jingles big minutes is how you do it, that is concerning.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,162
And1: 6,301
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#74 » by KGdaBom » Mon Jul 8, 2024 2:23 am

winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


If this is true, then one or both of Minott or Miller is gonna ride the pine for much of the year. I get prioritizing winning over development at this stage of the franchise. But, if playing Jingles big minutes is how you do it, that is concerning.

Based on his last couple seasons Jingles is still effective in limited minutes. I can definitely see him getting 10 a game and as you said it would be at the expense of Minott/Miller and Shannon to lesser degree.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,232
And1: 5,803
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#75 » by winforlose » Mon Jul 8, 2024 2:34 am

KGdaBom wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


If this is true, then one or both of Minott or Miller is gonna ride the pine for much of the year. I get prioritizing winning over development at this stage of the franchise. But, if playing Jingles big minutes is how you do it, that is concerning.

Based on his last couple seasons Jingles is still effective in limited minutes. I can definitely see him getting 10 a game and as you said it would be at the expense of Minott/Miller and Shannon to lesser degree.


“As heavily as his body will let him,” is more than 10. He averaged 17.2 last year. Assuming RD takes some of Mike’s minutes (play him less per game,) and all of the Monte/JMAC minutes, RD will play plenty. That leaves the Kyle minutes plus some shave on the minutes of Ant and the other starters to help them recover from the deep run/olympics. If those minutes go to Jingles that suggests Minott is a bust, and Miller is a disappointment.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,350
And1: 22,775
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#76 » by Klomp » Mon Jul 8, 2024 3:23 am

winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


If this is true, then one or both of Minott or Miller is gonna ride the pine for much of the year. I get prioritizing winning over development at this stage of the franchise. But, if playing Jingles big minutes is how you do it, that is concerning.

I've already been expecting that to be the case.....unless they really show out in summer league and training camp.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
cmoss84
Pro Prospect
Posts: 954
And1: 330
Joined: Jan 06, 2022

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#77 » by cmoss84 » Mon Jul 8, 2024 3:29 am

Youngster probably doesn't even know who Crocodile Dundee is...
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,417
And1: 19,470
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#78 » by shrink » Mon Jul 8, 2024 3:33 am

cmoss84 wrote:Youngster probably doesn't even know who Crocodile Dundee is...

Or a knife
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,708
And1: 5,203
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#79 » by minimus » Mon Jul 8, 2024 7:40 am

winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


If this is true, then one or both of Minott or Miller is gonna ride the pine for much of the year. I get prioritizing winning over development at this stage of the franchise. But, if playing Jingles big minutes is how you do it, that is concerning.


Nah, if anything Minott and Miller wont get playing time because they are better suited as PF rather than wings. In other words, Towns and Reid playing big chunk of minutes at PF will leave only limited amount of opportunites for Minott and Miller. Watch Joe Ingles videos: he can slash, he can pass and he can shoot. Neither of Miller/Minott can do these things at NBA level. However, if Towns will miss games due to load management it open a HUGE opportunity for Miller/Minott.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,232
And1: 5,803
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Joe Ingles Thread 

Post#80 » by winforlose » Mon Jul 8, 2024 8:50 am

minimus wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


If this is true, then one or both of Minott or Miller is gonna ride the pine for much of the year. I get prioritizing winning over development at this stage of the franchise. But, if playing Jingles big minutes is how you do it, that is concerning.


Nah, if anything Minott and Miller wont get playing time because they are better suited as PF rather than wings. In other words, Towns and Reid playing big chunk of minutes at PF will leave only limited amount of opportunites for Minott and Miller. Watch Joe Ingles videos: he can slash, he can pass and he can shoot. Neither of Miller/Minott can do these things at NBA level. However, if Towns will miss games due to load management it open a HUGE opportunity for Miller/Minott.


Disagree on both. Minott has the wrong body type to be a stretch 4. If anything he is more 2/3 than a 3/4. He should be capable of backing up MCD for 10+ minutes by now. That is not to suggest on a bad team with low stakes games and a ton of playing time he could not be salvaged, but for our purposes if he hasn’t gotten there by year 3, he is unlikely to get there. Miller is more an undersized 5 than a PF.

In any case both Karl and Naz have proven they can play SF without issues. Any lineup including Minott or Miller with Karl and Naz should be fine. I wouldn’t pair Minott with Gobert, and I would be careful about pairing Miller with Gobert (again two non shooters is a problem,) but either should be fine so long as they are the worst shooter on the floor for us.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves