D.Brasco wrote:
So Tatum has more playoff points than Kobe, but Kobe has 5 championship to Tatum's 1 and this is supposed to look good for Tatum?
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
D.Brasco wrote:
D.Brasco wrote:
D.Brasco wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:Tatum..
Seems like a complete disregard for winning. It's far easier to stuff the statsheet on a bad team.
Too many playing fantasy basketball.
warriorschamps wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Tatum..
Seems like a complete disregard for winning. It's far easier to stuff the statsheet on a bad team.
Too many playing fantasy basketball.
Agreed. Tatum may have his warts as a player. But he did just win the championship as the 1a or 1b on his team. And for me that matters. Some people are just looking at physical attributes and stats. I don't care too much about stats. Any player in the NBA could put up big numbers on a bad team. Not impressive to me.
So while I do think Wemby will eventually lead his team to wins personally I'm not going to rank him ahead of a guy like Tatum until his does. Saying he is on a bad team is too much of a cop out. Where do you draw the line? Where do you rank other good players on bad teams? There were guys on bad teams this year that had better years than Wemby. Obviously if Wemby year wasn't close to Tatum. Now if you are talking about potential maybe you could make the case. But you could make the case for other players as well. It's funny people talk about Anthony Edwards hype but imo Wemby has gotten more hype without so far playing anywhere near as well.
Again I do think Wemby can be great. But people need to seriously slow down here. And let Wemby earn it on the court like everybody else. NBA isn't just about physical attributes and potential. It's about production and results. And so far Wemby is behind a TON of guys in both departments.
But I get maybe because Nike is going through such a terrible time as a company maybe they are looking for the next big thing hoping that he will be the catalyst to turn around a slumping company. So maybe that's why there is so much Wemby hype. Because I've never seen a guy without any results and with Wemby production pushed as hard as some people are trying to push him.
Bottom line...for me production and results still matter over physical attributes and potential. So I'm obviously taking Tatum over Wemby until shows otherwise. Wemby is 7'4 and just shot 46% from the field. Not great. Also averaging 21 ppg in todays NBA when you don't have a bunch of other scorers on your team isn't great either.
Also as someone else has said we don't know how Wemby would mesh playing with a bunch of other good players because he hasn't been in the situation yet. Nor do we know how he would handling being the favorites in the playoffs or having pressure to produce in the playoffs because again he hasn't been in that situation yet.
It's possible Wembanyama could be better than Tatum next season. I wouldn't rule it out. But it's by no means a given like some are saying. One thing is for certain. Wemby will have to be a LOT better next season than he was this season for it to even be a debate.
LolBleed-Green wrote:CodeBreaker wrote:Why would anyone pick Tatum?
Because he'll still be higher impact player next year than Wemby.
ForeverTFC wrote:Wemby. No brainer.
... Though Bill Simmons thinks Tatum is still growing, so you never know!
Sweet Serenity wrote:Ah yes the great Wemby that joined a tanking 22 win team & took them to a whopping 22 wins ..
It looks like most of you don’t understand what winning basketball is. You’re trying to convince me that apparently a top 10 player in the league can’t win more games than when they were tanking the year prior ? Starts to make you sound stupid when you’re convinced he could’ve been a #1 on a championship team hey ..
CodeBreaker wrote:Why would anyone pick Tatum?
Dominator83 wrote:I'll take Wemby over ANY player now