Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

BuddyBuckets
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,342
And1: 1,052
Joined: Jan 23, 2019
 

Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#1 » by BuddyBuckets » Tue Jul 16, 2024 12:58 am

Just wanting some perspectives on this idea....

Pels get - Garland & Mobley
Cavs get - Dejounte, Herb, Murphy III

Mobley/Theis
Zion/JRE
Ingram/vet min
CJ/Hawkins
Garland/Jose

Allen/Niang
Murphy III/Wade
Herb/LeVert
Mitchell/Straus
Dejounte/Merrill?

Why?

Cleveland switches direction from the twin tower project to a smaller, defence heavy, squad to surround Mitchell. Pelicans solve the glut of wings by keeping Ingram and moving off the promising young guys in Herb and Murphy III.
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,967
And1: 13,894
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#2 » by Godaddycurse » Tue Jul 16, 2024 1:03 am

Pelicans look terrible on paper, especially financially
OxAndFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 3,100
Joined: May 17, 2022
Contact:

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#3 » by OxAndFox » Tue Jul 16, 2024 1:04 am

Think you would want to put Mobley with Herb and Murphy, to whichever team.
If I were NOP I would be trying to get Mobley with Zion and put a monster defensive team together.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,819
And1: 35,907
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#4 » by jbk1234 » Tue Jul 16, 2024 1:12 am

Unless Mobley is quietly asking out, the Cavs aren't going to do anything like this.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
bgrep14
Analyst
Posts: 3,024
And1: 293
Joined: Jun 14, 2009

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#5 » by bgrep14 » Tue Jul 16, 2024 1:17 am

I don’t think I’d trade Mobley for this even without Garlands inclusion. The guy is pretty untouchable.
louc1970
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,499
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#6 » by louc1970 » Tue Jul 16, 2024 12:10 pm

Pelicans owe a couple of FRPs.

Mobley is equal to Murphy/Jones.
Garland is worth more than Murray.

Make up the difference and do it.
The downside is Pels would be pretty much resigned to to keeping Ingram at a max-ish salary.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,856
And1: 7,821
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#7 » by jayjaysee » Tue Jul 16, 2024 12:17 pm

If Cleveland considered anything around this, you do it. Dump salary after.

You have to end up trying to find some acceptable perimeter defenders but have assets to do so.. are happy with Mobley/Zion/Garland for as long as they stay..

But how easy a yes it is for NOP probably means it’s not great for Cleveland? I think it’s just not a fixable base for Cleveland, but my shot would be they need all the value Ingram holds? Whatever it is.
louc1970
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,499
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#8 » by louc1970 » Tue Jul 16, 2024 12:19 pm

jbk1234 wrote:Unless Mobley is quietly asking out, the Cavs aren't going to do anything like this.

Why is this a valid response?

Not trying to flame here, but 99% of the trades suggested could be answered the same way.

It is for discussion. Me being a known non-fan of Mobley, What has Mobley done to show 1) he is a max guy, 2) he is not capable of being on the block?

If I look at the potential between Mobley and (Murphy/Jones) I take Jobes and Murphy every day.
Jon1798
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,735
And1: 2,632
Joined: Feb 15, 2005

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#9 » by Jon1798 » Tue Jul 16, 2024 1:25 pm

Mobley is not equal to Jones and Trey. Not even yet getting into the salary difference of Mobley being paid a max deal. Pels would never do that. Adding on Garlands deal, plus Zions max, CJ’s money etc is not at all a feasible scenario. Nor is starting Garland/CJ.

I get if Cavs fans feel attached to Mobley and not being comfortable wanting to deal him. No issue with that at all. But I think there is a major disconnect with just how valuable wings like Jones and Trey are.
"This post wants out of New Orleans" - Woj
tidho
General Manager
Posts: 9,621
And1: 3,161
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#10 » by tidho » Tue Jul 16, 2024 2:17 pm

louc1970 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Unless Mobley is quietly asking out, the Cavs aren't going to do anything like this.

Why is this a valid response?

Not trying to flame here, but 99% of the trades suggested could be answered the same way.

It is for discussion. Me being a known non-fan of Mobley, What has Mobley done to show 1) he is a max guy, 2) he is not capable of being on the block?

If I look at the potential between Mobley and (Murphy/Jones) I take Jobes and Murphy every day.


because it's nicer than saying "no f'ing way".

with your position on Mobley you wouldn't want NO to do the trade anyway, why have issues with others that wouldn't do the trade either?
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,819
And1: 35,907
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#11 » by jbk1234 » Tue Jul 16, 2024 2:18 pm

louc1970 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Unless Mobley is quietly asking out, the Cavs aren't going to do anything like this.

Why is this a valid response?

Not trying to flame here, but 99% of the trades suggested could be answered the same way.

It is for discussion. Me being a known non-fan of Mobley, What has Mobley done to show 1) he is a max guy, 2) he is not capable of being on the block?

If I look at the potential between Mobley and (Murphy/Jones) I take Jobes and Murphy every day.


Let's start with he's only 23, he averaged 21.4 ppg, 9.4 rpg, and 3.2 apg in that Celtics series, the front office is really high on him, and Windhorst is reporting he's going to get a 5 year extension this summer.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
louc1970
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,499
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#12 » by louc1970 » Tue Jul 16, 2024 2:28 pm

tidho wrote:
louc1970 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Unless Mobley is quietly asking out, the Cavs aren't going to do anything like this.

Why is this a valid response?

Not trying to flame here, but 99% of the trades suggested could be answered the same way.

It is for discussion. Me being a known non-fan of Mobley, What has Mobley done to show 1) he is a max guy, 2) he is not capable of being on the block?

If I look at the potential between Mobley and (Murphy/Jones) I take Jobes and Murphy every day.


because it's nicer than saying "no f'ing way".

with your position on Mobley you wouldn't want NO to do the trade anyway, why have issues with others that wouldn't do the trade either?

Not really. Instead of saying No way, give a reason that allows discussion. That is what this is about.

No one on this board is more “right” than the next. It is all opinions. I have no issues. I do have points of discussion.

Why would I not want NOP to do the trade?
louc1970
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,499
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#13 » by louc1970 » Tue Jul 16, 2024 2:29 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
louc1970 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Unless Mobley is quietly asking out, the Cavs aren't going to do anything like this.

Why is this a valid response?

Not trying to flame here, but 99% of the trades suggested could be answered the same way.

It is for discussion. Me being a known non-fan of Mobley, What has Mobley done to show 1) he is a max guy, 2) he is not capable of being on the block?

If I look at the potential between Mobley and (Murphy/Jones) I take Jobes and Murphy every day.


Let's start with he's only 23, he averaged 21.4 ppg, 9.4 rpg, and 3.2 apg in that Celtics series, the front office is really high on him, and Windhorst is reporting he's going to get a 5 year extension this summer.

Now that is a much better response to get the point across.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,819
And1: 35,907
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#14 » by jbk1234 » Tue Jul 16, 2024 2:33 pm

louc1970 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
louc1970 wrote:Why is this a valid response?

Not trying to flame here, but 99% of the trades suggested could be answered the same way.

It is for discussion. Me being a known non-fan of Mobley, What has Mobley done to show 1) he is a max guy, 2) he is not capable of being on the block?

If I look at the potential between Mobley and (Murphy/Jones) I take Jobes and Murphy every day.


Let's start with he's only 23, he averaged 21.4 ppg, 9.4 rpg, and 3.2 apg in that Celtics series, the front office is really high on him, and Windhorst is reporting he's going to get a 5 year extension this summer.

Now that is a much better response to get the point across.


All those things were true and publicly reported before I posted.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
louc1970
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,499
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#15 » by louc1970 » Tue Jul 16, 2024 2:40 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
louc1970 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
Let's start with he's only 23, he averaged 21.4 ppg, 9.4 rpg, and 3.2 apg in that Celtics series, the front office is really high on him, and Windhorst is reporting he's going to get a 5 year extension this summer.

Now that is a much better response to get the point across.


All those things were true and publicly reported before I posted.

Will Mobley maintain those stats or was this simply a few games where he was targeted. Mitchell did not play in those games.
Butterfingers1
Ballboy
Posts: 26
And1: 26
Joined: Oct 17, 2017

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#16 » by Butterfingers1 » Tue Jul 16, 2024 2:46 pm

This is pretty fair on paper since it balances the deficiencies of both rosters, with Pels the center spot, and for Cavs their wing position. I think the value is close, but in terms of pure upside value Garland and Mobley is probably worth more, but Herb has a very positive contract value which makes this kinda fair
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,083
And1: 14,453
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#17 » by cgf » Tue Jul 16, 2024 3:41 pm

Garland - Ingram seems like an interesting basis.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
toooskies
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,147
And1: 2,496
Joined: Jul 18, 2013
     

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#18 » by toooskies » Tue Jul 16, 2024 5:37 pm

louc1970 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
louc1970 wrote:Now that is a much better response to get the point across.


All those things were true and publicly reported before I posted.

Will Mobley maintain those stats or was this simply a few games where he was targeted. Mitchell did not play in those games.

I'm definitely not overreacting to Mobley having a good series against a team with very little rim protection with Porzingis out, but it seems like everybody's reacting as if Mobley was taking a leap when he was just taking advantage of Horford and Kornet.

But it was enough validation of Cleveland's front office priors that Mobley is the key to being a contender that Mobley's not going to be moved and he's going to sign an extension.
louc1970
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,499
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#19 » by louc1970 » Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:52 pm

toooskies wrote:
louc1970 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
All those things were true and publicly reported before I posted.

Will Mobley maintain those stats or was this simply a few games where he was targeted. Mitchell did not play in those games.

I'm definitely not overreacting to Mobley having a good series against a team with very little rim protection with Porzingis out, but it seems like everybody's reacting as if Mobley was taking a leap when he was just taking advantage of Horford and Kornet.

But it was enough validation of Cleveland's front office priors that Mobley is the key to being a contender that Mobley's not going to be moved and he's going to sign an extension.

I think everyone knows it would take such an overpay to get Mobley from Cleveland. But I do not see him being much different than many other similar sized PF.
Mobley is the least of the best group of young PF.

Zion
JJJ
Banchero
J smith-(Mobley probably better)

The primers:
Markkanen
Porzingis

The”older” guard:
Siakam
Giannis
AD
Towns
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,819
And1: 35,907
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Something Outlandish - Pels / Cavs 

Post#20 » by jbk1234 » Wed Jul 17, 2024 3:02 am

louc1970 wrote:
toooskies wrote:
louc1970 wrote:Will Mobley maintain those stats or was this simply a few games where he was targeted. Mitchell did not play in those games.

I'm definitely not overreacting to Mobley having a good series against a team with very little rim protection with Porzingis out, but it seems like everybody's reacting as if Mobley was taking a leap when he was just taking advantage of Horford and Kornet.

But it was enough validation of Cleveland's front office priors that Mobley is the key to being a contender that Mobley's not going to be moved and he's going to sign an extension.

I think everyone knows it would take such an overpay to get Mobley from Cleveland. But I do not see him being much different than many other similar sized PF.
Mobley is the least of the best group of young PF.

Zion
JJJ
Banchero
J smith-(Mobley probably better)

The primers:
Markkanen
Porzingis

The”older” guard:
Siakam
Giannis
AD
Towns


Are you including defense in your evaluation?
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.

Return to Trades and Transactions