garrick wrote:And some Suns fans thought Ayton at 36M was overpaid lol
Evan’s definitely worth this contract, not sure what you’re going on about.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
garrick wrote:And some Suns fans thought Ayton at 36M was overpaid lol
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
garrick wrote:And some Suns fans thought Ayton at 36M was overpaid lol
Iwasawitness wrote:garrick wrote:And some Suns fans thought Ayton at 36M was overpaid lol
Evan’s definitely worth this contract, not sure what you’re going on about.
Compared to what though?naabzor wrote:That's an overpay.
axeman23 wrote:Ballerhogger wrote:Chuck Everett wrote:
The issue is Mitchell's playing style. He's heliocentric without the talent nor the size.
True but he just signed max so he’s not going anywhere . Plus garland and trea backcourt doesn’t work
Trae and Mitchell backcourt doesn't work any better, and is probably worse...
Ballerhogger wrote:Cavs major issues are still bench and sf . Could Austin and Rui fill that need for garland . Making Mitchell prime ball handler .
One_and_Done wrote:A discount relative to Barnes.

Don't feed the trolls.JujitsuFlip wrote:Compared to what though?naabzor wrote:That's an overpay.
This means Barnes, Franz, and Cade were all overpays as well, right?
Ballerhogger wrote:Cavs major issues are still bench and sf . Could Austin and Rui fill that need for garland . Making Mitchell prime ball handler .