Jcool0 wrote:nikster wrote:Jcool0 wrote:
lol okay. They won a league best 62 games and had the league MVP. They had a starting lineup of All Stars Dan Majerle, Charles Barkley and Kevin Johnson. Had 4 players average 15+ pgg and 7 average 10+ pgg. The Suns averaged 113 ppg best int he league, next closet was Seattle at 108.
Think it's close to a wash, I dont think you can confidently say Suns were better. Scottie pippen was better than anybody Charles had beside him, Horace Grant was all defensive 2nd team, BJ Armstrong had a great finals and was all star the next year.
Chicago was coming off back to back championships, taking it easy in the regular season is expected for teams like that so the fact that Phoenix had a better record doesn't say much. Their ppg was also influenced by a relatively high pace (and Chicago's was slow). Offensive rating Suns had was 113.3, but Bulls were right behind them at 112.9.
Bulls won the championship so they were the "better team". But for the year the Suns were better. They did take Chicago to almost 7 games with Jordan averaging 40 pgg.
I don't know how much stock you can put into a regular season for a team coming off back to back titles. Did anybody have doubt Warriors were still the best team 17-18 and 18-19 despite not having the best record?















