Context wrote:RHODEY wrote:R-DAWG wrote:
Before the Bridges trade the Knicks were loaded with assets. They used those assets to get Bridges. We can debate if we feel the trade was an overpay or worth it. But it doesn’t change the fact that before the Bridges trade and this years draft we had all our future picks to trade, now we have none, and instead of 4 extras 1sts from other teams, we only have 2 - one of which is unlikely to convey.
So call a spade a spade - Leon paid anywhere between a very high price to an historic overpay for Bridges and will be operating with very few assets over the next 5 years.
Bridges was the perfect missing piece.
Thought to be unobtainable. Gives us (2) of the best 2 way wing defenders of the league. Bolsters our Bench - because you now add Ragu to it. Insane chemistry , insane options, insane offense, insane defense. We are undoubtable true contenders.
All for just soon to be geriatric Bogodonivic and some draft pics , most of which would not amount to much anyway IMO. I don t think we over-payed at all.
I couldnt have said it better...Not to mention, the salary valuation. That deal was a bargain for us!
Again, it wasn’t “some picks”. It was control of all our tradable draft capital plus control of 5/7 of our drafts.
I don’t understand why people discount those picks so much.
As I have said many times - if the trade was our 2024 picks and the picks we had from other teams it would be a bargain.
Listen to every review of trade. Even the people who love it start by saying how much of an overpay it was.
A bargain is parlaying Marcus Smart, Robert Williams, Malcom Brogodn and one future 1st into Jrue Holiday and Kristapas Porzingis
A premium is turning RJ Barrett, Immanuel Quickey, 4 unprotected 1st rd picks, a lightly protected 1st rd pick, and two high 2nd rd picks into OG Anunoby and Mikal Bridges.
























