zimpy27 wrote:These graphs have me questioning if Jokic is better than Nash
Jokic elevates his game in the playoffs way higher than Nash
Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ
zimpy27 wrote:These graphs have me questioning if Jokic is better than Nash
CodeBreaker wrote:zimpy27 wrote:These graphs have me questioning if Jokic is better than Nash
Jokic elevates his game in the playoffs way higher than Nash
homecourtloss wrote:.
CodeBreaker wrote:Something to leave here
Colbinii wrote:For 2020 and 2023 we have 7 series where Murray and Jokic played.
Nikola Jokic ON, Jamal Murray ON
1268 Minutes
+5.90 Net-Rtg
120.40 Ortg
Jamal Murray ON, Nikola Jokic OFF
283 Minutes
+1.18 Net-Rtg
111.30 Ortg
Nikola Jokic ON, Jamal Murray OFF
215 Minutes
-12.26 Net-Rtg
107.78 Ortg
CodeBreaker wrote:Something to leave here
Colbinii wrote:CodeBreaker wrote:Something to leave here
Perhaps you missed it earlier in this thread.Colbinii wrote:For 2020 and 2023 we have 7 series where Murray and Jokic played.
Nikola Jokic ON, Jamal Murray ON
1268 Minutes
+5.90 Net-Rtg
120.40 Ortg
Jamal Murray ON, Nikola Jokic OFF
283 Minutes
+1.18 Net-Rtg
111.30 Ortg
Nikola Jokic ON, Jamal Murray OFF
215 Minutes
-12.26 Net-Rtg
107.78 Ortg
Nash elevated in the playoffs too. And these are playoff graphs.CodeBreaker wrote:zimpy27 wrote:These graphs have me questioning if Jokic is better than Nash
Jokic elevates his game in the playoffs way higher than Nash
canada_dry wrote:Nash elevated in the playoffs too. And these are playoff graphs.CodeBreaker wrote:zimpy27 wrote:These graphs have me questioning if Jokic is better than Nash
Jokic elevates his game in the playoffs way higher than Nash
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
Djoker wrote:Many pages later and it's still an unfair comparison.
Jokic likely has the worst supporting cast on offense of all these guys. Since he entered his prime in 2021, he's only had a healthy Murray for one PS which is 2023. That's context that has to factor into this. He definitely has the worst rORtg numbers but that can be easily explained with other than "Jokic just isn't as good".
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.
lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
Djoker wrote:Many pages later and it's still an unfair comparison.
Jokic likely has the worst supporting cast on offense of all these guys. Since he entered his prime in 2021, he's only had a healthy Murray for one PS which is 2023. That's context that has to factor into this. He definitely has the worst rORtg numbers but that can be easily explained with other than "Jokic just isn't as good".
homecourtloss wrote:Djoker wrote:Many pages later and it's still an unfair comparison.
Jokic likely has the worst supporting cast on offense of all these guys. Since he entered his prime in 2021, he's only had a healthy Murray for one PS which is 2023. That's context that has to factor into this. He definitely has the worst rORtg numbers but that can be easily explained with other than "Jokic just isn't as good".
It wasn’t my intention to only compare Nikola Jokić, even though others are doing so, but talking about injuries and supporting cast isn’t really a good excuse when you’ve had other players who had multiple injuries to their teammates and/or diminished supporting casts do better. Additionally, there were people on this board and others who were making arguments forJokic being the greatest offensive player ever, and if you’re going to make those arguments, there are really high standards you have to meet.
Also, on an unrelated note, I saw that you forayed into the abyss of the GB with the Duncan thread
Colbinii wrote:Djoker wrote:Many pages later and it's still an unfair comparison.
Jokic likely has the worst supporting cast on offense of all these guys. Since he entered his prime in 2021, he's only had a healthy Murray for one PS which is 2023. That's context that has to factor into this. He definitely has the worst rORtg numbers but that can be easily explained with other than "Jokic just isn't as good".
Go look at LeBron's rORTG 2016-2018 without Kyrie
Djoker wrote:homecourtloss wrote:Djoker wrote:Many pages later and it's still an unfair comparison.
Jokic likely has the worst supporting cast on offense of all these guys. Since he entered his prime in 2021, he's only had a healthy Murray for one PS which is 2023. That's context that has to factor into this. He definitely has the worst rORtg numbers but that can be easily explained with other than "Jokic just isn't as good".
It wasn’t my intention to only compare Nikola Jokić, even though others are doing so, but talking about injuries and supporting cast isn’t really a good excuse when you’ve had other players who had multiple injuries to their teammates and/or diminished supporting casts do better. Additionally, there were people on this board and others who were making arguments forJokic being the greatest offensive player ever, and if you’re going to make those arguments, there are really high standards you have to meet.
Also, on an unrelated note, I saw that you forayed into the abyss of the GB with the Duncan thread
Greatest ever is going too far. We agree on that. I just want to point out that he's a bit disadvantaged.
GB is ok. A little change of scenery!
Colbinii wrote:Djoker wrote:Many pages later and it's still an unfair comparison.
Jokic likely has the worst supporting cast on offense of all these guys. Since he entered his prime in 2021, he's only had a healthy Murray for one PS which is 2023. That's context that has to factor into this. He definitely has the worst rORtg numbers but that can be easily explained with other than "Jokic just isn't as good".
Go look at LeBron's rORTG 2016-2018 without Kyrie
In 2015 (injured Kyrie) and 2018 (no Kyrie), the rORtg were much worse actually. Maybe when you say "without Kyrie" you meant when he's off the court in games he played but those are smaller samples.
CodeBreaker wrote:
falcolombardi wrote:Bottom of all this is that with jokic a lot of people use the idea of "ceiling raising" or elevating teams to the highest heights offensively to argue him as high as the greatest offensive player of all time
He has not done that. So people are being consistent
About it