ImageImage

Packers News, Transactions - 2025 off-season - McManus Signed - 3 Years/$15 million

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 9,046
And1: 5,084
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#821 » by RRyder823 » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:21 pm

MVP2110 wrote:
jute2003 wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:
I don't get this line of thinking tbh. The margins in sports absolutely can matter. The Brewers make a killing in baseball by being better than 99% of teams on the margins. It's not hard to find recent examples of bubble guys/practice squad guys who had to play significant snaps for the Packers(some good, some bad)
If you're banking on a system like the brewers making these guys truly matter on a game to game basis, than you believe the guys making the decisions and doing the coaching know what they're doing...which means you trust their decisions and aren't complaining about fringe guys that likely won't matter.


I like Gutey for sure, but he's not infallible by any means. I get that we're purely talking about depth guys here but the margins can absolutely matter in sports and acting like they don't is a line of thinking I just don't understand.
I agree the margins are important in this sport but it should be noted that these margin guys are only being discussed because the Packers were so deep at those positions that they couldn't beat out the guys ahead of them so really the big complaint seems to be "we had too many good players at those positions and had to cut a few. WTF Gute?"

Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,812
And1: 4,645
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#822 » by MVP2110 » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:21 pm

Ayt wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:
jute2003 wrote:I imagine they'll be right about some and wrong about some and not a single one will end up mattering one way or the other.


I don't get this line of thinking tbh. The margins in sports absolutely can matter. The Brewers make a killing in baseball by being better than 99% of teams on the margins. It's not hard to find recent examples of bubble guys/practice squad guys who had to play significant snaps for the Packers(some good, some bad)


Can you name some of these players that turned out to be anything in the NFL that the Packers were actually wrong about?


Lawrence Guy & Mike Pennel both have had long successful NFL careers after Green Bay cut them. JK Scott has turned into a really good punter. The Packers have cut several guys that went on to be successful long snapper in the NFL. Tayson Hill has been a good contributor for the Saints. Greg Van Roten was a starting OL last year.

It's also worth noting in recent years Gutey had been excellent at knowing who could sneak onto the PS, they hadn't lost someone since 2017 to waivers. This year for whatever reason was different
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 105,119
And1: 57,187
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson/Joseph Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#823 » by MickeyDavis » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:22 pm

Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,812
And1: 4,645
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#824 » by MVP2110 » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:22 pm

Reddeye wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:If Willis is truly going to be QB2 for week 1 then the decision to keep Clifford over Pratt is even more baffling

Read on Twitter
?t=r5gCj_m7qSRv0KJoYldw5g&s=19


Do we know if the Packers wanted Pratt on the practice squad and he chose Tampa? Or do you mean they should have kept 3 QBs on the 53?


Bill Huber reported the Packers wanted Clifford on the practice squad over there Michael Pratt
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 105,119
And1: 57,187
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson/Joseph Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#825 » by MickeyDavis » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:25 pm

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,812
And1: 4,645
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#826 » by MVP2110 » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:25 pm

RRyder823 wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:
jute2003 wrote:If you're banking on a system like the brewers making these guys truly matter on a game to game basis, than you believe the guys making the decisions and doing the coaching know what they're doing...which means you trust their decisions and aren't complaining about fringe guys that likely won't matter.


I like Gutey for sure, but he's not infallible by any means. I get that we're purely talking about depth guys here but the margins can absolutely matter in sports and acting like they don't is a line of thinking I just don't understand.
I agree the margins are important in this sport but it should be noted that these margin guys are only being discussed because the Packers were so deep at those positions that they couldn't beat out the guys ahead of them so really the big complaint seems to be "we had too many good players at those positions and had to cut a few. WTF Gute?"

Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app


To me it's moreso the guys he kept

Zayne Anderson is a ST only guy and he isn't even good in that role, that could have gone to AJJ

There was no reason to keep 6 Edge guys, one of those could have gone to Welch who was actually a good STer last year and played good LB in camp.

I think Andre Dillard sucks and would have cut him to keep a younger OL or one of Pratt or Kalen King.

Part of it absolutely is a numbers crunch that I don't blame Gutey on(Dubose for example), but losing the depth still could hurt
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,938
And1: 1,986
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson/Joseph Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#827 » by Treebeard » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:33 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:
Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


I wanted Carlson to succeed, but he was unreliable last year when he had no competition, and unreliable again this pre-season with legitimate competition. It wasn't a motivation thing about in-team competition, it apparently either is something in his mechanics, or he gets the yips in crunch time.
*******************************************************
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,683
And1: 4,482
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#828 » by Kerb Hohl » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:33 pm

MVP2110 wrote:
Ayt wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:
I don't get this line of thinking tbh. The margins in sports absolutely can matter. The Brewers make a killing in baseball by being better than 99% of teams on the margins. It's not hard to find recent examples of bubble guys/practice squad guys who had to play significant snaps for the Packers(some good, some bad)


Can you name some of these players that turned out to be anything in the NFL that the Packers were actually wrong about?


Lawrence Guy & Mike Pennel both have had long successful NFL careers after Green Bay cut them. JK Scott has turned into a really good punter. The Packers have cut several guys that went on to be successful long snapper in the NFL. Tayson Hill has been a good contributor for the Saints. Greg Van Roten was a starting OL last year.

It's also worth noting in recent years Gutey had been excellent at knowing who could sneak onto the PS, they hadn't lost someone since 2017 to waivers. This year for whatever reason was different


He knocked (probably) 3 straight drafts out of the park. It's getting harder to stash the players that we all hold dearly in our hearts on the 53...and then we forget about 98% of them by mid-September.

We've also gotten decent run out of some guys cut by other teams, I'm sure. Maybe not as much since we are still a draft & develop organization - but I'm sure there are some.
User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 29,208
And1: 9,789
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson/Joseph Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#829 » by crkone » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:43 pm

Sounds like LaFleur was going to have Dillon play that H Back role this season that he covets so dearly.

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 37,331
And1: 27,471
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson/Joseph Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#830 » by Matches Malone » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:45 pm

I was kind of bummed about AJJ getting claimed, mainly for depth. I think Oladapo is going to see more time at LB in sub packages this year than at safety. Health will be huge but I'm excited to see Bullard and Williams get the bulk of safety minutes next to McKinney. I have a gut feeling Evan Williams is going to be a stud in this defense and wouldn't be shocked if Bullard is taking reps away from Nixon in the slot by November.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
Reddeye
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,713
And1: 465
Joined: Mar 01, 2004

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#831 » by Reddeye » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:50 pm

MVP2110 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:
I like Gutey for sure, but he's not infallible by any means. I get that we're purely talking about depth guys here but the margins can absolutely matter in sports and acting like they don't is a line of thinking I just don't understand.
I agree the margins are important in this sport but it should be noted that these margin guys are only being discussed because the Packers were so deep at those positions that they couldn't beat out the guys ahead of them so really the big complaint seems to be "we had too many good players at those positions and had to cut a few. WTF Gute?"

Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app


To me it's moreso the guys he kept

Zayne Anderson is a ST only guy and he isn't even good in that role, that could have gone to AJJ

There was no reason to keep 6 Edge guys, one of those could have gone to Welch who was actually a good STer last year and played good LB in camp.

I think Andre Dillard sucks and would have cut him to keep a younger OL or one of Pratt or Kalen King.

Part of it absolutely is a numbers crunch that I don't blame Gutey on(Dubose for example), but losing the depth still could hurt


So you would rather have a 6th off ball LB instead of a 6th edge guy? It must have come down to Wilson or Welch for the 5th LB spot. I see the Ravens signed Welch. Not sure if it was PS or 53?

Dillard has done well in the preseason, but he has only played well at LT.

Read on Twitter
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 37,331
And1: 27,471
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson/Joseph Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#832 » by Matches Malone » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:51 pm

Finally, a kicker who can make a field goal from the left hash. That was Anders' achilles heel.

Read on Twitter
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,812
And1: 4,645
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#833 » by MVP2110 » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:52 pm

Reddeye wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:I agree the margins are important in this sport but it should be noted that these margin guys are only being discussed because the Packers were so deep at those positions that they couldn't beat out the guys ahead of them so really the big complaint seems to be "we had too many good players at those positions and had to cut a few. WTF Gute?"

Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app


To me it's moreso the guys he kept

Zayne Anderson is a ST only guy and he isn't even good in that role, that could have gone to AJJ

There was no reason to keep 6 Edge guys, one of those could have gone to Welch who was actually a good STer last year and played good LB in camp.

I think Andre Dillard sucks and would have cut him to keep a younger OL or one of Pratt or Kalen King.

Part of it absolutely is a numbers crunch that I don't blame Gutey on(Dubose for example), but losing the depth still could hurt


So you would rather have a 6th off ball LB instead of a 6th edge guy? It must have come down to Wilson or Welch for the 5th LB spot. I see the Ravens signed Welch. Not sure if it was PS or 53?

Dillard has done well in the preseason, but he has only played well at LT.

Read on Twitter


Essentially yes, we have 5 edge guys last year and the 5th barely played at all. Maybe Hafley will use Edge guys more liberally but I'm skeptical he'll ever go 5 deep at the position. That said I like both Mosby & Cox so it's whatever. I'm mostly annoyed with losing Pratt, AJJ, & Welch. But obviously Gute disagrees with me on those 3

Dillard is fine depth at LT, he's essentially useless anywhere else though and I think they could cover LT with others if it came down to it. They kept 3 backup tackles after all
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
MoMM
RealGM
Posts: 10,597
And1: 1,781
Joined: Jan 08, 2002
Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
Contact:
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#834 » by MoMM » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:55 pm

MVP2110 wrote:If Willis is truly going to be QB2 for week 1 then the decision to keep Clifford over Pratt is even more baffling

Read on Twitter
?t=r5gCj_m7qSRv0KJoYldw5g&s=19

Well, couldn't Pratt simply have said he would prefer to be on Bucs PS? He can choose, right?
User avatar
MoMM
RealGM
Posts: 10,597
And1: 1,781
Joined: Jan 08, 2002
Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
Contact:
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#835 » by MoMM » Wed Aug 28, 2024 7:57 pm

MVP2110 wrote:
jute2003 wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:
I don't get this line of thinking tbh. The margins in sports absolutely can matter. The Brewers make a killing in baseball by being better than 99% of teams on the margins. It's not hard to find recent examples of bubble guys/practice squad guys who had to play significant snaps for the Packers(some good, some bad)
If you're banking on a system like the brewers making these guys truly matter on a game to game basis, than you believe the guys making the decisions and doing the coaching know what they're doing...which means you trust their decisions and aren't complaining about fringe guys that likely won't matter.


I like Gutey for sure, but he's not infallible by any means. I get that we're purely talking about depth guys here but the margins can absolutely matter in sports and acting like they don't is a line of thinking I just don't understand.

Yes, margin matters, but ST too. Who will play more snaps? ST players or a 52nd/53rd depth player?
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,812
And1: 4,645
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#836 » by MVP2110 » Wed Aug 28, 2024 8:06 pm

MoMM wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:If Willis is truly going to be QB2 for week 1 then the decision to keep Clifford over Pratt is even more baffling

Read on Twitter
?t=r5gCj_m7qSRv0KJoYldw5g&s=19

Well, couldn't Pratt simply have said he would prefer to be on Bucs PS? He can choose, right?


He can but it's been reported that the Packers chose Clifford over Pratt
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,812
And1: 4,645
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#837 » by MVP2110 » Wed Aug 28, 2024 8:07 pm

MoMM wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:
jute2003 wrote:If you're banking on a system like the brewers making these guys truly matter on a game to game basis, than you believe the guys making the decisions and doing the coaching know what they're doing...which means you trust their decisions and aren't complaining about fringe guys that likely won't matter.


I like Gutey for sure, but he's not infallible by any means. I get that we're purely talking about depth guys here but the margins can absolutely matter in sports and acting like they don't is a line of thinking I just don't understand.

Yes, margin matters, but ST too. Who will play more snaps? ST players or a 52nd/53rd depth player?


It depends where the injuries occur during the season. The thing with Zayne is he isn't even a good STer
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
Ryan5UW
General Manager
Posts: 8,570
And1: 1,600
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Location: Madison, WI
     

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#838 » by Ryan5UW » Wed Aug 28, 2024 8:08 pm

MoMM wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:If Willis is truly going to be QB2 for week 1 then the decision to keep Clifford over Pratt is even more baffling

Spoiler:
Read on Twitter
?t=r5gCj_m7qSRv0KJoYldw5g&s=19

Well, couldn't Pratt simply have said he would prefer to be on Bucs PS? He can choose, right?


From Florida, went to school in Louisiana - not crazy to think he might have preferred to go back closer to home (and/or away from GB winters). More likely to get a chance to play there too. Not saying he will, but I think it's more likely he'd be playing over Mayfield in 3 years than he is over Love.
User avatar
Reddeye
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,713
And1: 465
Joined: Mar 01, 2004

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson/Joseph Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#839 » by Reddeye » Wed Aug 28, 2024 8:09 pm

Sounds like the Ravens didn't sign Welch.

Read on Twitter
User avatar
MoMM
RealGM
Posts: 10,597
And1: 1,781
Joined: Jan 08, 2002
Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
Contact:
       

Re: Packers News, Transactions, Trades - Carlson Cut; Narveson Claimed 

Post#840 » by MoMM » Wed Aug 28, 2024 8:10 pm

MVP2110 wrote:
MoMM wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:If Willis is truly going to be QB2 for week 1 then the decision to keep Clifford over Pratt is even more baffling

Read on Twitter
?t=r5gCj_m7qSRv0KJoYldw5g&s=19

Well, couldn't Pratt simply have said he would prefer to be on Bucs PS? He can choose, right?


He can but it's been reported that the Packers chose Clifford over Pratt

Should we trust this source? Maybe GB just didn't want to look bad.

Return to Green Bay Packers