BelgradeNugget wrote:Laimbeer wrote:the_process wrote:DEN can probably get off Porter and alleviate their financial concerns.
However, in the event that Porter's value is equal to Zach Lavines... this thread is necessary.
How is Denver getting off Porter? (okay maybe the Pistons would do it). But I don't think I've seen a fan of a team proposing they trade for Porter here. Lavine is a better player, though the health is a very fair question. Bottom line, I think Porter is worth less/more negative.
He, he funny thing is not one trade idea with MPJ here was made by Denver fans for a long time. And on every one of them you comment how you don't wan't him in Detroit. OK, we don't want to trade him. But if no one wanted MPJ how we had so many trade ideas in which you commented.
Ah, and MPJ is way better player than Lavine. MPJ was starting small forward on championship winning team, Lavine is carrier stat padder, losing player. Not many players could contribute to championship winning team.
I think most MPJ trades are based on the Nuggets getting financial relief, not other teams clamoring to get him. I don't think having won a title in that role is very persuasive. All kinds of players have contributed to championship teams.
I don't want him on the Pistons, but I put nothing past them. We dropped 2/52 on Tobias Harris and I can't imagine who else was offering anything close to that.