F N 11 wrote:?s=46
oy vey.
I love his shtick.
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Knicksfan1992 wrote:NiceLikeChrist wrote:Blows my mind that people are still ignoring the fact that we very likely take the celtics 6 or 7 if we just have OG out there. Bottom line is that we traded away all our depth and picks for pieces we didn't really NEED. All we NEEDED was a center replacement for iHart after he left us for OKC and a secondary PG to facilitate things while Brunson rests
We didn't NEED mikal and we definitely didn't NEED kat. We were already a top 3 team in the league as is.
If you applied this logic to the Boston Celtics they likely don't win a title last year because they wouldn't have traded for Jrue and KP because they didn't "need' either of them. They gave up useful depth pieces and assets to get them and were clearly a top 3-5 team when healthy already.
Not saying this is the exact same situation but, you shouldn't avoid improving your talent level just because you may lose some depth in the process.
NiceLikeChrist wrote:We are going to deeply regret this. We traded away the best player in the trade and still had to give up a great role player AND a pick?
so many people are going to eat their words about randle
3toheadmelo wrote:The Vo Show wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:OG doesn’t sound too thrilled about the trade
OG never sounds thrilled anyway lol. But I think he thought he was going to be a legit 3rd option on the team, especially given who was traded for him (the two guys who were the 3rd options on most nights). Then they brought in Mikal.
Circling back, doing the Bridges trade first instead of the KAT trade may have ruined the good vibes. I hope not but theres a chance of that now as opposed to what we probably all thought at the beginning of the offseason when the Bridges trade first happened.
I think he wanted to be here with Mikal. He resigned with us after we traded for Mikal. But he definitely sounds different about losing Randle and Donte imo.
NiceLikeChrist wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:NiceLikeChrist wrote:Blows my mind that people are still ignoring the fact that we very likely take the celtics 6 or 7 if we just have OG out there. Bottom line is that we traded away all our depth and picks for pieces we didn't really NEED. All we NEEDED was a center replacement for iHart after he left us for OKC and a secondary PG to facilitate things while Brunson rests
We didn't NEED mikal and we definitely didn't NEED kat. We were already a top 3 team in the league as is.
If you applied this logic to the Boston Celtics they likely don't win a title last year because they wouldn't have traded for Jrue and KP because they didn't "need' either of them. They gave up useful depth pieces and assets to get them and were clearly a top 3-5 team when healthy already.
Not saying this is the exact same situation but, you shouldn't avoid improving your talent level just because you may lose some depth in the process.
I would argue we didn't improve our talent at all. We lost more talent than we gained this offseason. iHart, Randle, DDV, Bojan, picks > Towns and Mikal
If we keep Randle and DDV and focus on getting a reliable big, not a star, and a reliable backup PG, not a star, we would still be ahead in talent over KAT and Mikal. We gave up way too much to get those 2.
Context wrote:E-Balla wrote:Context wrote:Oh no I havent! check my post history...I've always called him soft...Not to mention,
if I was a Kat guy - I had plenty of times to trade for him in BAF and I didnt...
I love the Kat trade for us "in context". I saw some of the guys you wanted us to take instead- they dont give us a chance to win it all..
And even if you hate Kat and think he will flop you cant argue that if he fits in and plays to his potential that we DO NO T have a chance bro...
I'll give you the health concerns but disagree with almost everything else
Since you wanted to throw me innothing but love for you though...
I will. He's not that guy. 19ppg on mediocre shooting percentages isn't taking us over the edge. The Pacers scored 124 points per 100 against us. The Sixers scored 118 points per 100 against us. He don't fix the reason we lost last year (lack of depth and defense). If OG and Mitch out again I don't see how he improves us even a little bit unless we trying to outgun Indiana and Philly with less offensive talent than they have.
Did you watch every one of our games bro in the playoffs?
Juco24 wrote:Knicks trade Robinson yet?
NiceLikeChrist wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:NiceLikeChrist wrote:Blows my mind that people are still ignoring the fact that we very likely take the celtics 6 or 7 if we just have OG out there. Bottom line is that we traded away all our depth and picks for pieces we didn't really NEED. All we NEEDED was a center replacement for iHart after he left us for OKC and a secondary PG to facilitate things while Brunson rests
We didn't NEED mikal and we definitely didn't NEED kat. We were already a top 3 team in the league as is.
If you applied this logic to the Boston Celtics they likely don't win a title last year because they wouldn't have traded for Jrue and KP because they didn't "need' either of them. They gave up useful depth pieces and assets to get them and were clearly a top 3-5 team when healthy already.
Not saying this is the exact same situation but, you shouldn't avoid improving your talent level just because you may lose some depth in the process.
I would argue we didn't improve our talent at all. We lost more talent than we gained this offseason. iHart, Randle, DDV, Bojan, picks > Towns and Mikal
If we keep Randle and DDV and focus on getting a reliable big, not a star, and a reliable backup PG, not a star, we would still be ahead in talent over KAT and Mikal. We gave up way too much to get those 2.
3toheadmelo wrote:
He got the Kevin seraphin bag in the post
E-Balla wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:E-Balla wrote:Actually (Please Use More Appropriate Word) in real life.
You're a wind bag. Blow yourself away. You have been crying like a little girl about things and lying about or over exaggerating things to do so. Insulting everyone on the board. Non stop for two days.
Bye.
I'm insulting YOU and YOU keep mentioning me. I ain't say **** to you besides tell you you're beneath me and you're mad I won't engage while constantly talking about having me muted. But you unmuting to read me insult you because you want approval from daddy.
NiceLikeChrist wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:NiceLikeChrist wrote:Blows my mind that people are still ignoring the fact that we very likely take the celtics 6 or 7 if we just have OG out there. Bottom line is that we traded away all our depth and picks for pieces we didn't really NEED. All we NEEDED was a center replacement for iHart after he left us for OKC and a secondary PG to facilitate things while Brunson rests
We didn't NEED mikal and we definitely didn't NEED kat. We were already a top 3 team in the league as is.
If you applied this logic to the Boston Celtics they likely don't win a title last year because they wouldn't have traded for Jrue and KP because they didn't "need' either of them. They gave up useful depth pieces and assets to get them and were clearly a top 3-5 team when healthy already.
Not saying this is the exact same situation but, you shouldn't avoid improving your talent level just because you may lose some depth in the process.
I would argue we didn't improve our talent at all. We lost more talent than we gained this offseason. iHart, Randle, DDV, Bojan, picks > Towns and Mikal
If we keep Randle and DDV and focus on getting a reliable big, not a star, and a reliable backup PG, not a star, we would still be ahead in talent over KAT and Mikal. We gave up way too much to get those 2.
aggo wrote:NiceLikeChrist wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:
If you applied this logic to the Boston Celtics they likely don't win a title last year because they wouldn't have traded for Jrue and KP because they didn't "need' either of them. They gave up useful depth pieces and assets to get them and were clearly a top 3-5 team when healthy already.
Not saying this is the exact same situation but, you shouldn't avoid improving your talent level just because you may lose some depth in the process.
I would argue we didn't improve our talent at all. We lost more talent than we gained this offseason. iHart, Randle, DDV, Bojan, picks > Towns and Mikal
If we keep Randle and DDV and focus on getting a reliable big, not a star, and a reliable backup PG, not a star, we would still be ahead in talent over KAT and Mikal. We gave up way too much to get those 2.
Stars get u championships. Not role players
NiceLikeChrist wrote:We are going to deeply regret this. We traded away the best player in the trade and still had to give up a great role player AND a pick?
so many people are going to eat their words about randle
Moose wrote:Jadoogar wrote:As a neutral, I absolutely love this for the Knicks. I've never been a Randle fan and the team proved they can win without him in the playoffs. KAT has his flaws but he's a great fit for the current team, especially with Brunson. The defense and depth will definitely be a problem, especially since guys like OG, KAT and Robinson get hurt so much. But it's easier to find depth on the fringes.
Offensively this team will be fantastic (health permitting). Brunson/KAT pick & roll with bridges and OG in the corners and Hart crashing the boards. Defensively will be a challenge but they have the flexibility of playing Robinson with KAT in the playoffs (again, health permitting).
Odds are, Knicks don't make a move until near the trade deadline, but trading Mitch for a healthier rim protecting big like Kessler + a depth piece, or perhaps Grant Williams + Nick Richards, I think could set us up for a big time playoff run.
TerrenceClarke wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
He got the Kevin seraphin bag in the post
People Brag about him shooting, but the mofo cant even back dudes down like that. Thats disgusting for a bigman. Randle Skillset is better, people just did not like him much as a person, so they skew the perception of his game.
All this dude will be doing is camping out in the playoffs.