ImageImageImageImageImage

KAT To The Knicks Part 2

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
NYKinMIA
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,456
And1: 5,077
Joined: Jul 26, 2012
Location: - Snootchie Town
 

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#261 » by NYKinMIA » Mon Sep 30, 2024 5:58 pm

F N 11 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46

oy vey.

I love his shtick.
NiceLikeChrist
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,777
And1: 1,756
Joined: Mar 16, 2012
 

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#262 » by NiceLikeChrist » Mon Sep 30, 2024 5:58 pm

Knicksfan1992 wrote:
NiceLikeChrist wrote:Blows my mind that people are still ignoring the fact that we very likely take the celtics 6 or 7 if we just have OG out there. Bottom line is that we traded away all our depth and picks for pieces we didn't really NEED. All we NEEDED was a center replacement for iHart after he left us for OKC and a secondary PG to facilitate things while Brunson rests

We didn't NEED mikal and we definitely didn't NEED kat. We were already a top 3 team in the league as is.


If you applied this logic to the Boston Celtics they likely don't win a title last year because they wouldn't have traded for Jrue and KP because they didn't "need' either of them. They gave up useful depth pieces and assets to get them and were clearly a top 3-5 team when healthy already.

Not saying this is the exact same situation but, you shouldn't avoid improving your talent level just because you may lose some depth in the process.

I would argue we didn't improve our talent at all. We lost more talent than we gained this offseason. iHart, Randle, DDV, Bojan, picks > Towns and Mikal

If we keep Randle and DDV and focus on getting a reliable big, not a star, and a reliable backup PG, not a star, we would still be ahead in talent over KAT and Mikal. We gave up way too much to get those 2.
NiceLikeChrist wrote:We are going to deeply regret this. We traded away the best player in the trade and still had to give up a great role player AND a pick?

so many people are going to eat their words about randle
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,515
And1: 95,221
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#263 » by thebuzzardman » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:00 pm

Trade Mitch, ride with Jericho Sims.

Here's 18 minutes of Jerich Sims highlights you must all watch to atone for your sins

Image
User avatar
Wildcat
RealGM
Posts: 14,794
And1: 4,604
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Astoria, NY
 

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#264 » by Wildcat » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:01 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
The Vo Show wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:OG doesn’t sound too thrilled about the trade
Read on Twitter


OG never sounds thrilled anyway lol. But I think he thought he was going to be a legit 3rd option on the team, especially given who was traded for him (the two guys who were the 3rd options on most nights). Then they brought in Mikal.

Circling back, doing the Bridges trade first instead of the KAT trade may have ruined the good vibes. I hope not but theres a chance of that now as opposed to what we probably all thought at the beginning of the offseason when the Bridges trade first happened.

I think he wanted to be here with Mikal. He resigned with us after we traded for Mikal. But he definitely sounds different about losing Randle and Donte imo.


He's feeling what the pro-Randle squad is feeling. We wanted to see what that January team could do.
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 95,153
And1: 136,346
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#265 » by 3toheadmelo » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:01 pm

TerrenceClarke wrote:The Nastiest of Works....





Image

He got the Kevin seraphin bag in the post
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
aggo
RealGM
Posts: 16,358
And1: 8,481
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#266 » by aggo » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:01 pm

NiceLikeChrist wrote:
Knicksfan1992 wrote:
NiceLikeChrist wrote:Blows my mind that people are still ignoring the fact that we very likely take the celtics 6 or 7 if we just have OG out there. Bottom line is that we traded away all our depth and picks for pieces we didn't really NEED. All we NEEDED was a center replacement for iHart after he left us for OKC and a secondary PG to facilitate things while Brunson rests

We didn't NEED mikal and we definitely didn't NEED kat. We were already a top 3 team in the league as is.


If you applied this logic to the Boston Celtics they likely don't win a title last year because they wouldn't have traded for Jrue and KP because they didn't "need' either of them. They gave up useful depth pieces and assets to get them and were clearly a top 3-5 team when healthy already.

Not saying this is the exact same situation but, you shouldn't avoid improving your talent level just because you may lose some depth in the process.

I would argue we didn't improve our talent at all. We lost more talent than we gained this offseason. iHart, Randle, DDV, Bojan, picks > Towns and Mikal

If we keep Randle and DDV and focus on getting a reliable big, not a star, and a reliable backup PG, not a star, we would still be ahead in talent over KAT and Mikal. We gave up way too much to get those 2.



Stars get u championships. Not role players
Juco24
Head Coach
Posts: 6,220
And1: 5,805
Joined: Feb 12, 2013

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#267 » by Juco24 » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:02 pm

Knicks trade Robinson yet?
User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,822
And1: 25,116
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#268 » by E-Balla » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:02 pm

Context wrote:
E-Balla wrote:
Context wrote:Oh no I havent! check my post history...I've always called him soft...Not to mention,
if I was a Kat guy - I had plenty of times to trade for him in BAF and I didnt...

I love the Kat trade for us "in context". I saw some of the guys you wanted us to take instead- they dont give us a chance to win it all..
And even if you hate Kat and think he will flop you cant argue that if he fits in and plays to his potential that we DO NO T have a chance bro...
I'll give you the health concerns but disagree with almost everything else 8-)

Since you wanted to throw me in :lol: nothing but love for you though...

I will. He's not that guy. 19ppg on mediocre shooting percentages isn't taking us over the edge. The Pacers scored 124 points per 100 against us. The Sixers scored 118 points per 100 against us. He don't fix the reason we lost last year (lack of depth and defense). If OG and Mitch out again I don't see how he improves us even a little bit unless we trying to outgun Indiana and Philly with less offensive talent than they have.

Did you watch every one of our games bro in the playoffs?

I watched most of them twice even. Maxey got what he wanted. Embiid got every whistle ever. TJ, Hali, and Nembhard cooked us. Our defense was just awful. We had no control over the pace of games and our defense was swiss cheese especially without OG and Mitch. Brunson alone had our offense running smooth, that's not why we lost. Hell him, Miles, and Donte were cooking against Indy. We lost a game where they had 70 combined points.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,515
And1: 95,221
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#269 » by thebuzzardman » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:03 pm

This topic is fun like this song

Image
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,044
And1: 56,067
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#270 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:04 pm

Juco24 wrote:Knicks trade Robinson yet?




Not yet, but Fila is debuting the Mitch 3s.


Image



sham got his sneaker bot ready to buy them.
Zenzibar
General Manager
Posts: 8,850
And1: 9,504
Joined: Jan 10, 2019
         

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#271 » by Zenzibar » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:05 pm

NiceLikeChrist wrote:
Knicksfan1992 wrote:
NiceLikeChrist wrote:Blows my mind that people are still ignoring the fact that we very likely take the celtics 6 or 7 if we just have OG out there. Bottom line is that we traded away all our depth and picks for pieces we didn't really NEED. All we NEEDED was a center replacement for iHart after he left us for OKC and a secondary PG to facilitate things while Brunson rests

We didn't NEED mikal and we definitely didn't NEED kat. We were already a top 3 team in the league as is.


If you applied this logic to the Boston Celtics they likely don't win a title last year because they wouldn't have traded for Jrue and KP because they didn't "need' either of them. They gave up useful depth pieces and assets to get them and were clearly a top 3-5 team when healthy already.

Not saying this is the exact same situation but, you shouldn't avoid improving your talent level just because you may lose some depth in the process.

I would argue we didn't improve our talent at all. We lost more talent than we gained this offseason. iHart, Randle, DDV, Bojan, picks > Towns and Mikal

If we keep Randle and DDV and focus on getting a reliable big, not a star, and a reliable backup PG, not a star, we would still be ahead in talent over KAT and Mikal. We gave up way too much to get those 2.



Do you think Rose and the team didn't look for these dudes, where are they exactly?


iHart was nice for us but is not on KAT's level. Divo was good for us but is not on Mikal's level. Bojan, had 1 good game and was a liability on defense. The picks are the nature of the game and we had a couple of good picks this year anyway.
Stop All Genocides
User avatar
TerrenceClarke
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,252
And1: 8,180
Joined: Nov 26, 2020
Location: Gotham City
 

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#272 » by TerrenceClarke » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:05 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
TerrenceClarke wrote:The Nastiest of Works....





Image

He got the Kevin seraphin bag in the post


People Brag about him shooting, but the mofo cant even back dudes down like that. Thats disgusting for a bigman. Randle Skillset is better, people just did not like him much as a person, so they skew the perception of his game.

All this dude will be doing is camping out in the playoffs.
Memphis Grizzlies AKA Wing Stop
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,392
And1: 27,069
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#273 » by Jalen Bluntson » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:05 pm

E-Balla wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
E-Balla wrote:Actually (Please Use More Appropriate Word) in real life.


You're a wind bag. Blow yourself away. You have been crying like a little girl about things and lying about or over exaggerating things to do so. Insulting everyone on the board. Non stop for two days.

Bye.

I'm insulting YOU and YOU keep mentioning me. I ain't say **** to you besides tell you you're beneath me and you're mad I won't engage while constantly talking about having me muted. But you unmuting to read me insult you because you want approval from daddy.


You are an insignificant dweeb. None of your posts have been insightful or factual in any way. Go play cry baby games with your and-1 boyfriend and blow away wind bag. You've been deemed obsolete.

Thanks. Bye.
:beer: RIP mags
Knicksfan1992
RealGM
Posts: 14,081
And1: 14,565
Joined: Jun 14, 2012
         

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#274 » by Knicksfan1992 » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:06 pm

NiceLikeChrist wrote:
Knicksfan1992 wrote:
NiceLikeChrist wrote:Blows my mind that people are still ignoring the fact that we very likely take the celtics 6 or 7 if we just have OG out there. Bottom line is that we traded away all our depth and picks for pieces we didn't really NEED. All we NEEDED was a center replacement for iHart after he left us for OKC and a secondary PG to facilitate things while Brunson rests

We didn't NEED mikal and we definitely didn't NEED kat. We were already a top 3 team in the league as is.


If you applied this logic to the Boston Celtics they likely don't win a title last year because they wouldn't have traded for Jrue and KP because they didn't "need' either of them. They gave up useful depth pieces and assets to get them and were clearly a top 3-5 team when healthy already.

Not saying this is the exact same situation but, you shouldn't avoid improving your talent level just because you may lose some depth in the process.

I would argue we didn't improve our talent at all. We lost more talent than we gained this offseason. iHart, Randle, DDV, Bojan, picks > Towns and Mikal

If we keep Randle and DDV and focus on getting a reliable big, not a star, and a reliable backup PG, not a star, we would still be ahead in talent over KAT and Mikal. We gave up way too much to get those 2.


I don't agree but I understand your above POV and why I'm hesitant to full on like this trade. If I had to rank current talent wise it i'd say:

Towns slightly ahead of Randle

small gap

Mikal

big gap

IHart
DDV

Bojan.

Again it depends on if you think the jump to Mikal from IHart and DDV is worth it.. If you don't then you'll probably feel similarly to how you feel.
User avatar
F N 11
RealGM
Posts: 94,988
And1: 67,722
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
Contact:
 

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#275 » by F N 11 » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:07 pm

Tyler 21olek

Read on Twitter
?s=46
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
NiceLikeChrist
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,777
And1: 1,756
Joined: Mar 16, 2012
 

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#276 » by NiceLikeChrist » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:07 pm

aggo wrote:
NiceLikeChrist wrote:
Knicksfan1992 wrote:
If you applied this logic to the Boston Celtics they likely don't win a title last year because they wouldn't have traded for Jrue and KP because they didn't "need' either of them. They gave up useful depth pieces and assets to get them and were clearly a top 3-5 team when healthy already.

Not saying this is the exact same situation but, you shouldn't avoid improving your talent level just because you may lose some depth in the process.

I would argue we didn't improve our talent at all. We lost more talent than we gained this offseason. iHart, Randle, DDV, Bojan, picks > Towns and Mikal

If we keep Randle and DDV and focus on getting a reliable big, not a star, and a reliable backup PG, not a star, we would still be ahead in talent over KAT and Mikal. We gave up way too much to get those 2.



Stars get u championships. Not role players


We already had 2, we made all these trades, sacrificed our depth and picks, and still have 2. So again, I don't see how we improved talent wise.
NiceLikeChrist wrote:We are going to deeply regret this. We traded away the best player in the trade and still had to give up a great role player AND a pick?

so many people are going to eat their words about randle
Jadoogar
RealGM
Posts: 17,326
And1: 16,964
Joined: May 06, 2010
   

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#277 » by Jadoogar » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:07 pm

Moose wrote:
Jadoogar wrote:As a neutral, I absolutely love this for the Knicks. I've never been a Randle fan and the team proved they can win without him in the playoffs. KAT has his flaws but he's a great fit for the current team, especially with Brunson. The defense and depth will definitely be a problem, especially since guys like OG, KAT and Robinson get hurt so much. But it's easier to find depth on the fringes.

Offensively this team will be fantastic (health permitting). Brunson/KAT pick & roll with bridges and OG in the corners and Hart crashing the boards. Defensively will be a challenge but they have the flexibility of playing Robinson with KAT in the playoffs (again, health permitting).


Odds are, Knicks don't make a move until near the trade deadline, but trading Mitch for a healthier rim protecting big like Kessler + a depth piece, or perhaps Grant Williams + Nick Richards, I think could set us up for a big time playoff run.


do the Knicks have any assets left? I know bridges trade took most of it.
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 95,153
And1: 136,346
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#278 » by 3toheadmelo » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:08 pm

TerrenceClarke wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
TerrenceClarke wrote:The Nastiest of Works....





Image

He got the Kevin seraphin bag in the post


People Brag about him shooting, but the mofo cant even back dudes down like that. Thats disgusting for a bigman. Randle Skillset is better, people just did not like him much as a person, so they skew the perception of his game.

All this dude will be doing is camping out in the playoffs.

That’s what I was tryna tell 2010. This dude is not like that as a shot creator. He just be jacking up 3s.
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,515
And1: 95,221
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#279 » by thebuzzardman » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:11 pm

Melo is deeper into the disinformation game these last few days than when the actual Melo was traded. Wild.
Image
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,044
And1: 56,067
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: KAT To The Knicks Part 2 

Post#280 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Mon Sep 30, 2024 6:11 pm

F N 11 wrote:Tyler 21olek

Read on Twitter
?s=46




He looks like a villain in a movie, like the young loyal deputy to a corrupt Sheriff that's trying to help a corporation run Sylvester Stallone off his land.

Return to New York Knicks