Parasite wrote:Hal14 wrote:Parasite wrote:I’m sorry, gonna rant a minute but not keeping Lonnie is criminal. Look at the absolute scrubs on our bench. Sign that guy ASAP!
They might be scrubs but they're scrubs with upside. If we give them minutes and develop them, they'll get better and won't be scrubs anymore. The hope is that at least 1 or 2 of them develop into a solid rotational piece. That's less likely to happen if they're on the bench in favor of LOnnie Walker - a guy who's about to turn 26, with 6 yrs of NBA experience so he has much less upside.
At this point, Walker pretty much is who is he - a guy who all 30 teams passed on offering a roster spot to.
We won the game by 20. If we had Walker in there during garbage time, we would have won by 20. It wouldn't have made a difference.
I disagree with you when you say we still would’ve won by 20 with Lonnie out there. Walker might suck defensively, but so do those other guys. At least Lonnie can fill it up.
What are you saying exactly? That we would have won by 24 instead of 20 if Lonnie was in there at garbage time?
With all due respect, that's a really pointless thing to debate
Either way, we win by 20+ points, so who cares? Again, we mine as well play the young guys and develop them if we win by 20+ points either way..
Also, Springer and Walsh definitely do not suck defensively. Not sure there's anything logical to base that on..
Parasite wrote:You are certainly higher on them than me. None of Rico/Walsh/Davison/Springer/Peterson will come close to being the player Walker is.
-That's your opinion. Hard to buy it though when all 30 teams passed on offering Walker a roster spot. Perhaps he's just not as good as some Celtics fans think..
-Peterson and Davison are on 2-way contracts. Saying that they won't be as good as Walker isn't super relevant. We're paying both of them peanuts and can cut them at anytime, as 2-way contracts are non-guaranteed. Walker is not eligible for a 2-way contract.
-Scheierman was a consensus 1st round pick..many even saw him as a top 20 prospect in this draft class. Let's give him some time. Sure, he's old for a rookie but so was Hauser, Strus, Duncan Robinson, Derrick White, FRed VanVleet, Caleb Martin, Gabe Vincent, Haywood Highsmith, etc. and they were all g league guys their rookie year. Then look what the developed into.
-Walsh and Springer are over 3 years younger than Walker. So there's pretty clear upside with both of them..and they both have guaranteed contracts for this season. Walker was just on an exhibit 10 deal and as we all know, would've cost the team like $11 mil in additional salary/taxes.
With the 14 guys we already had on guaranteed contracts, plus our 3 2-way guys (so 17 total players) that's plenty of depth and talent to get through the season. With or without walker, we're heavy title favorites and won our first 2 games by 20+ points. Hard to justify paying the extra $11 mil for Walker, imo..