Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
-
uraverage
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,394
- And1: 575
- Joined: Jun 11, 2015
-
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
Apples and oranges... One is asked to be a Batman and the other is asked to be a Robin.
For me the Magic made the right pick for them.
For me the Magic made the right pick for them.
Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
-
sikma42
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,932
- And1: 6,157
- Joined: Nov 23, 2011
Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
BrooklynDynasty wrote:Duke4life831 wrote:The answer to me is still what it’s always been. Both teams got the player they needed.
ORL was in desperate need for a true #1 option and 2 years in, it looks they hit a HR with that.
While OKC needed a big that could play off of SGA. I don’t think Paolo would as impactful as he is if he was playing off of SGA. Plus OKC needs rim protection.
that's just another way of saying Orlando needed a true #1 option star, and OKC needed a role player. Which just proves the Banchero > Chet point further
It’s tough bc I think Chet is a massively overrated offensive player BUT on defense he brings a lot to the table, which could make him more valuable than a mid #1 option.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Re: Safe to say, Chet Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
- Jakay
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 29,831
- And1: 6,283
- Joined: Jan 27, 2003
- Location: Half out of my mind
- Contact:
Re: Safe to say, Chet Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
GSWFan1994 wrote:hyper316 wrote:Banchero's archetype (a big, versatile wing who can serve as a team's primary scorer) is very easy to identify as a success mold in the NBA's history. Many champions and contenders had a similar player like him as their best player.
I am very curious who these teams are with a versatile giant wing PF leading them to the chip. LeBron... sure, of course. Beyond that though.. mmm.. Bird... Dirk maybe.
I don't disagree he can be that guy, but I wouldn't blanket statement it's one of the prominent championship positions. Guards and Cs have been more impactful there imo.
Re: Safe to say, Chet
-
GreatWhiteStiff
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,265
- And1: 12,684
- Joined: Oct 17, 2011
- Location: Overusing finna
-
Re: Safe to say, Chet
sikma42 wrote:BrooklynDynasty wrote:Duke4life831 wrote:The answer to me is still what it’s always been. Both teams got the player they needed.
ORL was in desperate need for a true #1 option and 2 years in, it looks they hit a HR with that.
While OKC needed a big that could play off of SGA. I don’t think Paolo would as impactful as he is if he was playing off of SGA. Plus OKC needs rim protection.
that's just another way of saying Orlando needed a true #1 option star, and OKC needed a role player. Which just proves the Banchero > Chet point further
It’s tough bc I think Chet is a massively overrated offensive player BUT on defense he brings a lot to the table, which could make him more valuable than a mid #1 option.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
I mean is Chets offence massively overrated? I always though Chet would succeed in the nba, but were people expecting more than 17 ppg with good across the board efficiency on a top regular season team in the league with one of the best scorers in the game? Man, I'm kind of satisfied with where he's at right now.

Let's playin for 9th!
"OG puts the clamps on point guards like Trae Young." -DelAbbot
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
- Lalouie
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,603
- And1: 12,568
- Joined: May 12, 2017
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
too early, but by position
,,,,,,
blanchero's position is a dime a dozen
,,,,,,
blanchero's position is a dime a dozen
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
-
Ritzo
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,928
- And1: 2,813
- Joined: Dec 06, 2016
-
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
I will flip a coin to be honest.
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
-
The-Stallion70
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,927
- And1: 705
- Joined: Mar 22, 2022
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
Call me when Chet has to lead his own team. Shai is the first guy teams try to stop on OKC.
California Gold wrote:This is extra because people hate the Lakers and their brand so much.
This trade wasn't some conspiracy - it was just a GM wanting AD bad enough where in most people's eyes he overpaid by a long shot to get him.
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
- Knightro
- Forum Mod - Magic

- Posts: 28,858
- And1: 29,889
- Joined: Dec 18, 2010
- Location: Jersey
-
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
Full disclosure I liked Chet a lot more than I liked Paolo when they were both draft prospects.
But I do think it’s clear at this point that both guys went to the right spots for their respective games.
But I do think it’s clear at this point that both guys went to the right spots for their respective games.
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
-
Johnny Firpo
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,217
- And1: 9,545
- Joined: Apr 17, 2009
-
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
It was so obvious, going back to high school, that Chet is going to be a superstar. There were few players I was more sure about, and okay, we still cannot fully declare that he is one right now, small sample size, I know, but man, if you watching that kid play, and you don't see two-way star, I honestly don't understand why. He has no holes in his game, and this was so obvious in his rookie year, or even before that. That level of mobility, length, shooting and shotblocking, as well as B-ball IQ and passing? He is almost as unique as Wemby. He could be a better Dirk, or a Dirk/Lively combo, or something crazy like that. PB is awesome too, btw, he also has superstar potential imo.
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
-
slick_watts
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 16,559
- And1: 6,817
- Joined: Jan 03, 2005
- Location: Miami, FL
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
i like paolo a whole lot, and did predraft. if the thunder had the opportunity to take paolo and chet i was basically 50/50 as a thunder an at the time. but my thoughts are the same as they were last year, i don't think paolo can match chet's two-way potential.
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
-
Magicman125
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,379
- And1: 521
- Joined: Jul 09, 2010
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
They're both in a great position to grow and fully realize their potential with the teams that drafted them. They'll both be stars in this league for a long time to come, but I think Paolo is a number 1 option on offense and Chet is a defensive anchor. Neither will ever be as good as the other on the opposite end of the ball.
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
-
Rainwater
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,632
- And1: 7,525
- Joined: Apr 02, 2017
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
They both will be great given their situation. I feel this is a debate that will go on until they retire.
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
- TheWitcher
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,099
- And1: 1,528
- Joined: Nov 10, 2014
- Location: Florida
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
It's a lot closer than people think. It's not a blunder like the Luka draft. I think Paolo is perfect for the Magic.
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
-
sikma42
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,932
- And1: 6,157
- Joined: Nov 23, 2011
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
Don’t think that’s safe to say.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
-
MrGoat
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,236
- And1: 7,994
- Joined: Aug 14, 2019
-
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
Even almost two years later on this thread still too early to say
Free Luigi
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
- LAvision
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,590
- And1: 5,660
- Joined: Jun 24, 2009
Re: Safe to say, Chet
- MoneyTalks41890
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 32,940
- And1: 25,288
- Joined: Oct 13, 2009
-
Re: Safe to say, Chet
sikma42 wrote:Don’t think that’s safe to say.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Weird bump. Paolo hasn’t been out of the first round what does a Chet game in the finals have to do with a comp to a guy who hasn’t been close to it?
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
- AIfan3
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,561
- And1: 3,816
- Joined: Mar 21, 2005
- Location: Searching for AI's mojo..
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
Chet still has time to develop. He's not better than Paolo currently, but his ceiling is definitely higher.
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
-
sikma42
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,932
- And1: 6,157
- Joined: Nov 23, 2011
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
MoneyTalks[emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]]]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]]]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]]]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]]]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]]]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]]]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]]]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]]]]]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]] wrote:sikma[emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji[emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]]]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji[emoji638][emoji639][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]]] wrote:Don’t think that’s safe to say.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Weird bump. Paolo hasn’t been out of the first round what does a Chet game in the finals have to do with a comp to a guy who hasn’t been close to it?
This is the comp people have been making for years.
OKC will obviously consider trading him over the summer. Just that he may have hurt his trade value this year. He’s very injury prone and hasn’t developed offensively.
Not sure if he’d be able to get Giannis even with OKCs draft capital at this point.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
-
The Servant
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,301
- And1: 1,649
- Joined: Dec 26, 2022
-
Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero
HolmGOAT will have a tremendous bounce back game. Yes, he was a baby giraffe out there today, but he's got a mean streak in him and he will be back for game 7. Next year he'll be carrying an extra 5 pounds of lean mass as well!






