VFX wrote: Orlando is where players come to get paid for lesser results, with lesser expectations, because the fan base will make exceptions for them at every turn. Look no further than Fultz or Elfrid.
Oh now you are just threatening me with a good time in terms of talking points.
But yeah, we talked about this and agreed plenty the last 2 years. I only defer slightly on this point because Jett aint it chief. At least not yet.
Cole, I have no friggin clue man. It's like he got payed, came out as the person we thought he always was (potential 6th man of the year) and somehow degraded to 3rd string. That's on him. I am not sure that is front office at all.
Isaac, still brings something tangible when he plays. My word, I need to stop talking here, because that's where it ends.
Point being though, we doubled down on the 3&D group and much like you, I am not sure it was the right play. I had faith that an "upgraded version of Harris" would be shooting 39% on his attempts and to be fair, 39% from him last night, changes enough of the makeup of the game that it BECOMES a different game. So yeah, I get being upset about it.
I just didn't want to turn this into a lets toss all the options out. When the reality was, yes, you want to develop your rookies? You play them last year, when you were literally playing a rapidly declining Cole and a non existent PG in Fultz.