76ciology wrote:Iverson Armband wrote:Mik317 wrote:
you need a borderline perfect team to win with anyone if you are going to pedantic about it.
No one is flawless. You need a team that can cover those flaws. Giannis got wall'd for years because Bledsoe was an ass PG . They got him Jrue and then PJ to take the load off on the perimeter and Bropez being the perfect floor spacing and rim protector allowed Giannis to roam. Middleton was the closer for that run as well. Portis also fit well. ...Middleton fell apart, Jrue got old and then traded, and they never replaced PJ...and suddenly first round exits galore.
Jokic is the best in the world right now. But doesn't win **** without them trading for Aaron Gordon who is able to not only protect the rim but also guard up and down...as well as being a lob threat. KCP and their gaggle of wing defenders covers for Jokic' lack of foot speed and also are all great release valves. AGain he also had a closer in Playoff Jamal Murray. Murray may be washed and their wings aren't as good and now they don't look like world beaters anymore.
I am not absolving Biid of his own ****. I have said for damn near a decade that he needed to try to be Tim Duncan and not the stupid Kobe Shaq Dirk homunculus he has attempted to be...and that required loosing some weight and be less ball dominant. He didn't do that and has to hold that L. HOWEVER I don't think its neigh impossible to have built a better more cohesive roster around him either. They damn near did so twice and I wouldn't call those perfect rosters by no stretch of the imagination, there was always something that was just outright bad and you have to live with it (normally the bench lol) but both time we had those good rosters were also the both times we were close to breaking through IMO. Each of the recent champs all went through some playoff failure....and most of it was due to their star's flaws imo. Giannis lack of bag. Jokic' defense. Tatum/Brown's lack of playmaking. Their FOs constantly tweaked their teams to help hide those flaws WHILE enhancing their strengths...ours took for granted that Biid could always just elevate other players with his gravity and his playstyle that relies on tough shot making and grifting would just never fall off while also expecting him to lead a top defense too as they constantly looked for the BIG MOVE down the line. They made small and quiet additions (Derrick White, Jrue twice, guys like Bruce Brown, the aforementioned Aaron Gordon trade); we every year hope for the buy out market to get us a not washed old dude because we used all of our ammo on bad moves prior.
Thats the difference IMO.
Obviously, no player can do it by themselves. Hell, Jordan couldn’t. The difference with Joel is he seems to….need everything. He needs an elite guard. He needs elite wings. He needs another big who can shoot. He needs another big that can pass and rebound because he can’t. He needs an above average backup because he’s unreliable .. you get my point. He needs leaders because he isn’t one. At some point it’s like damn.
And you even said so yourself, Biid had some of those teams we all agree fit him to tee and what happened? You blame the FO for tinkering, but I think they saw those results and how unreliable/small Joel came up and probably panicked a bit trying to get pieces around him. It didn’t work but I don’t think it’s from lack of trying. All parties have their fair share of blame but the failures of this era fall squarely at his feet IMO
Joel Embiid fits best on a team like Team USA, where they don’t rely on him to carry the load every game. They can handle stretches when he’s not fully engaged, and he can step up in specific matchups or clutch moments. In this setup, he’s more of a “final piece” rather than the “centerpiece”.
The issue with building around Embiid is his unpredictability. Sometimes he’s dominant, but other times he might not even show up mentally or physically. It’s like rolling dice—you don’t know if he’ll play, be locked in, or if his jumper will fall. So, the best setup for him is a team that doesn’t completely depend on him. They should be good enough to compete without him and let him add value as needed, like icing on the cake instead of the cake itself.
Well said.














