RoteSchroder wrote:maternal85 wrote:RoteSchroder wrote:
Derozan started off with worse athleticism, worse defense, worse offensive skill set, worse b-ball IQ, yet we made that bum our franchise player and he turned into an all-star.
Masai not thinking he would reach this level doesn't mean he didn't see potential in him, otherwise why would we draft Siakam over the highly touted Skal.
Pre-draft, scouts and journalists were already commenting on Siakam's potential. It's not like zero people recognized the possibility of a high upside. Many players don't have this upside and are projected to be a role player. Pre-draft there were scouts reporting on Siakam having high two-way upside, including being elite defensively, only that it was a big question mark on if he could ever get there.
Then why was he drafted in the late first round ? Do you realize he's better than the 1st overall pick in his draft class ? Let me guess, scouts expected that as well ? Siakam overachieved point blank.
Every player who reaches their peak overachieves. Derozan also overachieved. What's your point? In context, is it rare for players to reach their potential?
High upside doesn't mean they're likely to get there. With Siakam there were a ton of question marks mainly because of his age. If he was doing the same thing at 18/19 instead of 22, he'd go higher.
Also, the athletic 6'8/6'9 archetype wasn't exactly highly coveted at the time. Kawhi and Giannis were drafted at 15, and at a much younger age. It was also mainly Masai trying to go after these players. Look at him taking Bruno, OG, Scottie.
It doesn't seem like anything will change your mind, just remember he was drafted 27th and he most likely goes 1st in a redraft, that alone contradicts everything you're saying. Scouts and GMs flat out didn't expect this type of growth. Saying that you did is like saying you knew the winning lottery numbers after the prize was already won