Decipher wrote:Lots of comparisons here between Joel & Giannis and, as a Nets fan, I think it’s unfair
Reality is that the Bucks probably won their title because Giannis injured Kyrie and Harden was on one leg
Also had KD wearing clown shoes that turned a 3 into a 2
That “luck” is the difference between the two being talked about in the same way
You can win with Embiid (
if he’s still healthy) with a few tweaks and the same luck required by all championship teams
No, he wasn’t, no, he isn’t, and he probably never will be fully healthy. Even if he does manage to get better, it’s safer to assume that his health will always be a concern. I’m not saying he’ll never play, but he will likely continue to have stretches where he’s either missing games or playing below his best—what I call being “spiritually absent,” lethargic, or not fully engaged.
It’s like relying on a key player who can occasionally light up the scoreboard but also has periods where they’re off the court or not performing at their peak. So, it’s
smarter to have a backup plan in place—which is to have another alpha that can be an engine to the system ready to step up and keep the team running smoothly, both during the regular season and in the playoffs without Embiid.
The situation is more like late stages of Derrick Rose with the Bulls back then or late stages of Patrick Ewing with the Knicks.
Next week, he might play and all of these will sounds like BS. But it’s almost guaranteed that at the end of the season when we’re eliminated in the playoffs, you’d look back and say that this sentiment is right.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.