KnicksGod wrote:You like that KAT is taking this on, he wants this city
He was bred for NY- just like Brunson was...our story keeps getting better and better KG...
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
KnicksGod wrote:You like that KAT is taking this on, he wants this city

3toheadmelo wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:In the last 2:51 of the 4th quarter, RJ
1. Turned the ball over
2. Shot an airball 3 from the right corner, and
3. Closed out late on KATS’s 3 from the left wing to put the Knicks up 113-108 with 6.3 in the game.
Waking up knowing that RJ isn’t a Knick and how we were right about him. We know ball!
KnixinSix wrote:HEZI wrote:KnixinSix wrote:
In the Thibs system we have been playing Hart and Bridges defense have defenitely been subpar this year. Having Mitch in the middle made everyone look good since on those blow bys Mitch would be there to clean the mess.
What some people dont understand is even if KAT continues to play the 5 for like 24-28 minutes a game. Having Mitch even for the remaining 20-24 minutes a game at the 5 would make a HUGE difference.
So worst case you wouldn't be playing the lockdown D all game like we played post OG last year (before all the crazy injuries hit) but playing it half the time with a greatly improved offense.
Inability to stay in front of your man isn’t a “Thibs system” issue. That’s a player issue. But yes because they do suck at guarding on the perimeter and constantly give up drives, a rim protector would help a great deal because they can at least have some cover in the paint and not have it become a layup line like last night and throughout most of the season so far.
Actually while you might be right it can be more nuanced than that. For instance what type of leverage is Thibs having them play. What type of positioning is he asking them to play? A lot can contribute to waht on the surface seems like just 'crappy' D by the player.
thebuzzardman wrote:Wildcat wrote:Not a very inspiring team game. They have to get it together. Nail bitter against the Raptors???
Everyone trying to tell themselves how great this team has looked, when it hasn't looked that good all year.
I guess they need another 20 games to "gel"
Will 40 games be enough?
60?
80, just in time for the playoffs?
?
stuporman wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Wildcat wrote:Not a very inspiring team game. They have to get it together. Nail bitter against the Raptors???
Everyone trying to tell themselves how great this team has looked, when it hasn't looked that good all year.
I guess they need another 20 games to "gel"
Will 40 games be enough?
60?
80, just in time for the playoffs?
You've been here long enough to not know the cope mantra... .500 till new year's day. As inconsistent as they have been so far this season they are still 14-9.
Buttah304 wrote:OG has done it again:
3 Blocks
2 Steals
10 Contested Shots
7 Deflections
Lead the team in every category


Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
robillionaire wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:robillionaire wrote:This was a loss if Towns didn’t play. Not just from the last 5 points but also he removed Barnes
Knicks with another win over a team missing one of their best players...best two players actually
Maybe these other teams should stop running their players into the ground???

TKKnicks1 wrote:stuporman wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
Everyone trying to tell themselves how great this team has looked, when it hasn't looked that good all year.
I guess they need another 20 games to "gel"
Will 40 games be enough?
60?
80, just in time for the playoffs?
You've been here long enough to not know the cope mantra... .500 till new year's day. As inconsistent as they have been so far this season they are still 14-9.
15-9 which puts them 8th best in the league with the number 1 offense. IMO they are still not completely there and we are about 1/3 of the way into the season but they have definitely surpassed my expectations thus far. I thought we would be .500 till January.
?dakomish23 wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:?s=61
Players averaging 23 /5 /5
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Nikola Jokić
LaMelo Ball
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
Luka Dončić
Jayson Tatum
De'Aaron Fox
Franz Wagner
Tyler Herro
Cade Cunningham
LeBron James
Stephen Curry
And....
RJ Barrett

stuporman wrote:TKKnicks1 wrote:stuporman wrote:
You've been here long enough to not know the cope mantra... .500 till new year's day. As inconsistent as they have been so far this season they are still 14-9.
15-9 which puts them 8th best in the league with the number 1 offense. IMO they are still not completely there and we are about 1/3 of the way into the season but they have definitely surpassed my expectations thus far. I thought we would be .500 till January.
The concept '.500 till new year's day' is based on that Thib's Knicks teams have been around .500 until new year's day when they tend to surge later in the season as that particular season's roster jels and becomes more consistent. I have been saying it repeatedly through the beginning of the season to give some context to it.
The fact that this group is ahead of that pace while still not playing up to their potential consistently shows something. Excetly what I'm not going to say but I can speculate that once the 'new year's day' threshold passes we may get a fuller picture of what they can be.
There's going to be inconsistent stretches and performances earlier in the season if Thib's past Knicks teams are any indication that get ironed out and they grow in cohesiveness on both ends of the court as they season goes along. This is what history tells us but time will tell what this team does.


Chanel Bomber wrote:
This is great. We need to generate 3s off off-the-ball movement from OG and Bridges (but mostly Bridges as he's much more mobile). Otherwise we just become too predictable.
This version of Bridges (decent volume of 3s and respectable conversion plus off-ball movement plus solid defense plus the usual midrangs game) makes us a legitimate contender imo, assuming health. He's the most crucial variable.
Reign23 wrote:man do I enjoy the anti-RJ posts. He is so good now, that the "SEE he sucks" posts come when he hangs an efficient 30 on one of the best perimeter defenders in the league while playing with a bunch of 2nd and 3rd stringersnever change guys!
HarthorneWingo wrote:In the last 2:51 of the 4th quarter, RJ
1. Turned the ball over
2. Shot an airball 3 from the right corner, and
3. Closed out late on KATS’s 3 from the left wing to put the Knicks up 113-108 with 6.3 in the game.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Iron Mantis wrote:dakomish23 wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:?s=61
Players averaging 23 /5 /5
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Nikola Jokić
LaMelo Ball
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
Luka Dončić
Jayson Tatum
De'Aaron Fox
Franz Wagner
Tyler Herro
Cade Cunningham
LeBron James
Stephen Curry
And....
RJ Barrett
The kid won. Proved his haters wrong. Got em panic-posting.
