Image ImageImage Image

NBA Trade Thread #11

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,808
And1: 9,267
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#161 » by Chi town » Tue Dec 10, 2024 3:21 am

HomoSapien wrote:Pistons were the team most linked to Zach before he has his season ending surgery. I guess there's no reason to believe their initial reason for wanting him would have changed given that he's playing so much better.


The GM that wanted him was fired and replaced.

Zach also opted for foot surgery when the Pistons trade smoke heated up.
2weekswithpay
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,552
And1: 2,653
Joined: Dec 22, 2020
     

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#162 » by 2weekswithpay » Tue Dec 10, 2024 3:24 am

Read on Twitter
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,808
And1: 9,267
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#163 » by Chi town » Tue Dec 10, 2024 3:28 am

I will keep saying it…

Zach stays and Coby goes for a 1st in this draft and a future 1st or young player.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 9,263
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#164 » by Dan Z » Tue Dec 10, 2024 4:19 am

SirKaiser wrote:These Lavine trades always sound horrible as long as they are considered a salary dump. Get back to me when there's a combination of players and multiple picks (one of which needs to be a 1st).

Last year Lavine's stock took a hit for multiple reasons, and I applaud AK for not selling low. They know he's worth so much more than what we've been seeing in these "rumors"


What if nobody offers a first round pick for him or a decent young player? Do the Bulls keep him indefinitely?
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,808
And1: 9,267
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#165 » by Chi town » Tue Dec 10, 2024 4:38 am

Dan Z wrote:
SirKaiser wrote:These Lavine trades always sound horrible as long as they are considered a salary dump. Get back to me when there's a combination of players and multiple picks (one of which needs to be a 1st).

Last year Lavine's stock took a hit for multiple reasons, and I applaud AK for not selling low. They know he's worth so much more than what we've been seeing in these "rumors"


What if nobody offers a first round pick for him or a decent young player? Do the Bulls keep him indefinitely?


I think you have to keep him until the summer when a lot of trades open up and he only has two years left on his deal and the cap rises. His injury stuff is even farther in the rear view.
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,778
And1: 9,353
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#166 » by Dez » Tue Dec 10, 2024 4:44 am

Chi town wrote:I will keep saying it…

Zach stays and Coby goes for a 1st in this draft and a future 1st or young player.


You can keep saying it but the only way Coby fetches 2 1sts is if they are top 20 protected.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,808
And1: 9,267
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#167 » by Chi town » Tue Dec 10, 2024 5:44 am

Dez wrote:
Chi town wrote:I will keep saying it…

Zach stays and Coby goes for a 1st in this draft and a future 1st or young player.


You can keep saying it but the only way Coby fetches 2 1sts is if they are top 20 protected.


Prob lottery and we take back a meh contract.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 9,263
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#168 » by Dan Z » Tue Dec 10, 2024 7:40 am

Chi town wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
SirKaiser wrote:These Lavine trades always sound horrible as long as they are considered a salary dump. Get back to me when there's a combination of players and multiple picks (one of which needs to be a 1st).

Last year Lavine's stock took a hit for multiple reasons, and I applaud AK for not selling low. They know he's worth so much more than what we've been seeing in these "rumors"


What if nobody offers a first round pick for him or a decent young player? Do the Bulls keep him indefinitely?


I think you have to keep him until the summer when a lot of trades open up and he only has two years left on his deal and the cap rises. His injury stuff is even farther in the rear view.


I'm not sure how concerned teams are about his injury history. He's healthy now and definitely doesn't have a history like other players such as Kawhi, Zion, Lonzo, etc. Relative to the league he plays an okay amount of games (besides last year, which I think he could've continued to play had he not opted for surgery, but why gut it out that season?).

As for waiting until the summer it depends on the deal. You think the Bulls should keep him if all they're offered are contracts (players without long term deals) and something minor like a few seconds? It might be a good idea to just move on. Plus, waiting could still mean nothing better is offered.
Muzbar
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,344
And1: 2,959
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#169 » by Muzbar » Tue Dec 10, 2024 8:39 am

Dan Z wrote:
Chi town wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
What if nobody offers a first round pick for him or a decent young player? Do the Bulls keep him indefinitely?


I think you have to keep him until the summer when a lot of trades open up and he only has two years left on his deal and the cap rises. His injury stuff is even farther in the rear view.


I'm not sure how concerned teams are about his injury history. He's healthy now and definitely doesn't have a history like other players such as Kawhi, Zion, Lonzo, etc. Relative to the league he plays an okay amount of games (besides last year, which I think he could've continued to play had he not opted for surgery, but why gut it out that season?).

As for waiting until the summer it depends on the deal. You think the Bulls should keep him if all they're offered are contracts (players without long term deals) and something minor like a few seconds? It might be a good idea to just move on. Plus, waiting could still mean nothing better is offered.

I'm with you. I think the Bulls should pull the band-aid off, but I wouldn't be surprised if Zach is retained due to them being unable to trade him. I don't agree with it, but it seems likely that's what'll happen.

Vuc on the other hand should definitely be traded, plus he should be easier to trade seeing as he's got 1 left year than LaVine, more than 20m less per year than LaVine which also makes it easier to match.

Vuc, Coby and Zach, IMO, should all be traded, Pat should be explored as should Giddey (I had high hopes...).
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. :kissmybutt:
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 9,263
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#170 » by Dan Z » Tue Dec 10, 2024 9:33 am

Muzbar wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
Chi town wrote:
I think you have to keep him until the summer when a lot of trades open up and he only has two years left on his deal and the cap rises. His injury stuff is even farther in the rear view.


I'm not sure how concerned teams are about his injury history. He's healthy now and definitely doesn't have a history like other players such as Kawhi, Zion, Lonzo, etc. Relative to the league he plays an okay amount of games (besides last year, which I think he could've continued to play had he not opted for surgery, but why gut it out that season?).

As for waiting until the summer it depends on the deal. You think the Bulls should keep him if all they're offered are contracts (players without long term deals) and something minor like a few seconds? It might be a good idea to just move on. Plus, waiting could still mean nothing better is offered.

I'm with you. I think the Bulls should pull the band-aid off, but I wouldn't be surprised if Zach is retained due to them being unable to trade him. I don't agree with it, but it seems likely that's what'll happen.

Vuc on the other hand should definitely be traded, plus he should be easier to trade seeing as he's got 1 left year than LaVine, more than 20m less per year than LaVine which also makes it easier to match.

Vuc, Coby and Zach, IMO, should all be traded, Pat should be explored as should Giddey (I had high hopes...).


I agree. Move on to the next iteration of the team.

I wonder what kind of value Coby has...?
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,589
And1: 9,280
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#171 » by sco » Tue Dec 10, 2024 1:36 pm

Dan Z wrote:
Muzbar wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
I'm not sure how concerned teams are about his injury history. He's healthy now and definitely doesn't have a history like other players such as Kawhi, Zion, Lonzo, etc. Relative to the league he plays an okay amount of games (besides last year, which I think he could've continued to play had he not opted for surgery, but why gut it out that season?).

As for waiting until the summer it depends on the deal. You think the Bulls should keep him if all they're offered are contracts (players without long term deals) and something minor like a few seconds? It might be a good idea to just move on. Plus, waiting could still mean nothing better is offered.

I'm with you. I think the Bulls should pull the band-aid off, but I wouldn't be surprised if Zach is retained due to them being unable to trade him. I don't agree with it, but it seems likely that's what'll happen.

Vuc on the other hand should definitely be traded, plus he should be easier to trade seeing as he's got 1 left year than LaVine, more than 20m less per year than LaVine which also makes it easier to match.

Vuc, Coby and Zach, IMO, should all be traded, Pat should be explored as should Giddey (I had high hopes...).


I agree. Move on to the next iteration of the team.

I wonder what kind of value Coby has...?

I'm on board. Zach will be hard to move during the season, but IMO the trade-off is the impact of trading him on our pick this season as to whether we take a deal without picks. I doubt Pat gets traded (and don't think he has much value...maybe a non-lotto 1st and a shorter contract back). If we get any kind of 1st for Giddey I'd take it, but I suspect they won't do that deal either. I can see the logic giving Giddey the full season to see how he responds if we trade Zach/Vuc, and maybe try to keep him on a Pat or cheaper deal.

As much as I am on board with a full rebuild, I just don't think AK goes there. I think his goal is to bring back more "Giddeys" and see if he can build around a young/experienced core and find a #1 via FA/trade and hope that Matas or a future 1st turn into a #2.
:clap:
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,605
And1: 4,386
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#172 » by pipfan » Tue Dec 10, 2024 4:50 pm

I'm fine with keeping Giddy if he's not penciled in as a long term starter. Play him 24 min off the bench and he works (and pay him accordingly). If he gets a better offer, bon voyage

Keep Ayo/Lavine (if no good offers come)/Matas/PWill/Smith
Trade White and Vuc to create some cap space and get assets

Keep our pick this year and see what happens
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,589
And1: 9,280
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#173 » by sco » Tue Dec 10, 2024 6:58 pm

pipfan wrote:I'm fine with keeping Giddy if he's not penciled in as a long term starter. Play him 24 min off the bench and he works (and pay him accordingly). If he gets a better offer, bon voyage

Keep Ayo/Lavine (if no good offers come)/Matas/PWill/Smith
Trade White and Vuc to create some cap space and get assets

Keep our pick this year and see what happens

If we are keeping Zach into next season, I'd really try to keep Ball (if healthy) and start him over Giddey. I still think the pairing of those two is very good.
:clap:
Guru
Analyst
Posts: 3,745
And1: 807
Joined: Oct 29, 2001

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#174 » by Guru » Tue Dec 10, 2024 8:37 pm

sco wrote:
pipfan wrote:I'm fine with keeping Giddy if he's not penciled in as a long term starter. Play him 24 min off the bench and he works (and pay him accordingly). If he gets a better offer, bon voyage

Keep Ayo/Lavine (if no good offers come)/Matas/PWill/Smith
Trade White and Vuc to create some cap space and get assets

Keep our pick this year and see what happens

If we are keeping Zach into next season, I'd really try to keep Ball (if healthy) and start him over Giddey. I still think the pairing of those two is very good.


the pairing of Ball with Giddey is too
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,808
And1: 9,267
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#175 » by Chi town » Tue Dec 10, 2024 9:22 pm

I bet Jimmy goes to the Rockets for J Green and filler. Herro and Green would be fun but most likely ineffective.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,589
And1: 9,280
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#176 » by sco » Tue Dec 10, 2024 9:35 pm

Chi town wrote:I bet Jimmy goes to the Rockets for J Green and filler. Herro and Green would be fun but most likely ineffective.

I think GS has better assets and a greater sense of urgency. Just hope teams view Zach as a consolation prize or a useful salary in a 3 way deal.
:clap:
Muzbar
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,344
And1: 2,959
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#177 » by Muzbar » Tue Dec 10, 2024 9:54 pm

Chi town wrote:I bet Jimmy goes to the Rockets for J Green and filler. Herro and Green would be fun but most likely ineffective.

Jalen Green cannot be traded this year due to his extension...
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. :kissmybutt:
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,808
And1: 9,267
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#178 » by Chi town » Tue Dec 10, 2024 11:08 pm

Muzbar wrote:
Chi town wrote:I bet Jimmy goes to the Rockets for J Green and filler. Herro and Green would be fun but most likely ineffective.

Jalen Green cannot be traded this year due to his extension...


Hmm. Rockets don’t have the contract do they?

I’d love to see Jimmy on the Dubs.

Don’t see how he has much value.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,657
And1: 9,263
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#179 » by Dan Z » Tue Dec 10, 2024 11:14 pm

sco wrote:
Dan Z wrote:
Muzbar wrote:I'm with you. I think the Bulls should pull the band-aid off, but I wouldn't be surprised if Zach is retained due to them being unable to trade him. I don't agree with it, but it seems likely that's what'll happen.

Vuc on the other hand should definitely be traded, plus he should be easier to trade seeing as he's got 1 left year than LaVine, more than 20m less per year than LaVine which also makes it easier to match.

Vuc, Coby and Zach, IMO, should all be traded, Pat should be explored as should Giddey (I had high hopes...).


I agree. Move on to the next iteration of the team.

I wonder what kind of value Coby has...?

I'm on board. Zach will be hard to move during the season, but IMO the trade-off is the impact of trading him on our pick this season as to whether we take a deal without picks. I doubt Pat gets traded (and don't think he has much value...maybe a non-lotto 1st and a shorter contract back). If we get any kind of 1st for Giddey I'd take it, but I suspect they won't do that deal either. I can see the logic giving Giddey the full season to see how he responds if we trade Zach/Vuc, and maybe try to keep him on a Pat or cheaper deal.

As much as I am on board with a full rebuild, I just don't think AK goes there. I think his goal is to bring back more "Giddeys" and see if he can build around a young/experienced core and find a #1 via FA/trade and hope that Matas or a future 1st turn into a #2.


I agree with you in regards to what AK will probably do. Unfortunately it might take a long time to find a bunch of "Giddeys" where one takes a big step forward.
Muzbar
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,344
And1: 2,959
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: NBA Trade Thread #11 

Post#180 » by Muzbar » Tue Dec 10, 2024 11:28 pm

Chi town wrote:
Muzbar wrote:
Chi town wrote:I bet Jimmy goes to the Rockets for J Green and filler. Herro and Green would be fun but most likely ineffective.

Jalen Green cannot be traded this year due to his extension...


Hmm. Rockets don’t have the contract do they?

I’d love to see Jimmy on the Dubs.

Don’t see how he has much value.

Yeah, Rockets have some contracts, Dillon Brooks earns 22m, so that's a good start and they have a few 12m and 8m deals.

Amen Thompson (9.2m), Brooks (22.2m) & Steven Adams (12.6) = 44.1m for Jimmy (48.7m) works, plus they have picks.

I could definitely see Houston making a push for Jimmy, he is from Texas after all.
Here to argue about nonsensical things and suck away your joy. :kissmybutt:

Return to Chicago Bulls