Wildcat wrote:Context wrote:Wildcat wrote:
You say that like that's a good thing. This vastly superior team should not be neck and neck with last year's early roster. And a year ago nobody was satisfied with this team.
At what point would you be concern? The excuses were 10 games, 15, 20, now we're at 25.
you dont have any regard for chemistry and having 10 new players on a team and how that impacts a teams performance.
There is a fine line between cause and effect and "excuses".
It's worth a reasonable discussion and not a blind eye. Can't blame chemistry when you're dropping games against Charlotte and Utah. I'm not even going to talk about why the Hawks seem like prime Bulls against the Knicks. I'm sure I'm not the only one here that clinches their cheeks when we see a .500 going up against the Knicks.
come out of the tunnel (respectfully on this). The nba is filled with the best players in the world. We happen to have fans in every arena- that motivates teams to play hard against us.
It doesnt help when your team has 10 new players(in those situations). Not to mention, these players are #2's and 3's on other teams...You dont realize how much work is involved
for guys to adjust their games, learn player tendencies, coaching sets, etc and play against
the best in the world. You bring up Utah but that was clearly a bad front court match up for us- especially when you take the growth that needs to happen from this new team.
I cant believe you think this group drops games. That tells me you dont know the leaders on this team if you think that. They are not build that way. The hawks are big, long, hate the hell out of us and were the better team the last time we met. We were not ready. It's not because we gave the game away or we didnt put forth our best effort.
With all due respect Wild IMO I dont think this view is reasonable... Kat is our only true big
thats been available- Precious just played his 3rd game and we have no Mitch. These are not excuses -this is just what we are currently...