MIL | POR

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,545
And1: 1,254
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

MIL | POR 

Post#1 » by tester551 » Sat Dec 14, 2024 11:21 pm

Throwing this idea out there... Im sure both teams will hate it:

Bucks send
Middleton + AJ Johnson

Blazers send
Grant + Reath

Bucks shed just a little salary, but get a more reliable (healthy) F in Grant. Dame & Grant have a good relationship.
Reath gives the Bucks an extra backup big who can spread the floor.

Blazers make this swap solely for contracts. Middleton can opt out in June (expiring) or more than likely has 1.5 seasons left. The Reath/Johnson swap just gives Portland another prospect to see if they will develop.
wemby
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,901
And1: 1,238
Joined: Jun 13, 2023
 

Re: MIL | POR 

Post#2 » by wemby » Sat Dec 14, 2024 11:42 pm

I'd definitely do this for the Bucks, they have very little flexibility and this doesn't make them a contender but works towards rejuvenating their lineup and at least making them respectable enough to appease Giannis. I don't know why the Blazers would do this, though... Middleton is washed. If this is about them shedding salary, they can probably find more attractive ways to do so (Middleton isn't expiring and there's no added incentive). In short, this is lopsided in favor of the Bucks.
User avatar
Pattycakes
General Manager
Posts: 8,578
And1: 2,195
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Contact:
     

Re: MIL | POR 

Post#3 » by Pattycakes » Sun Dec 15, 2024 1:42 am

Bucks need to add more
Somewhere trying not to offend Texas Chuck.
psman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 5,899
Joined: Feb 12, 2016
 

Re: MIL | POR 

Post#4 » by psman2 » Sun Dec 15, 2024 1:48 am

I guess if Portland really like AJ Johnson this could have some legs. Midds might be able to be spun of for less long term money, I doubt he is opting out of 34m.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,550
And1: 13,910
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: MIL | POR 

Post#5 » by JRoy » Sun Dec 15, 2024 2:25 am

tester551 wrote:Throwing this idea out there... Im sure both teams will hate it:

Mission Accomplished!

Bucks send
Middleton + AJ Johnson

Blazers send
Grant + Reath

Bucks shed just a little salary, but get a more reliable (healthy) F in Grant. Dame & Grant have a good relationship.
Reath gives the Bucks an extra backup big who can spread the floor.

Blazers make this swap solely for contracts. Middleton can opt out in June (expiring) or more than likely has 1.5 seasons left. The Reath/Johnson swap just gives Portland another prospect to see if they will develop.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,545
And1: 1,254
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: MIL | POR 

Post#6 » by tester551 » Sat Dec 21, 2024 7:18 am

tester551 wrote:Throwing this idea out there... Im sure both teams will hate it:

Bucks send
Middleton + AJ Johnson

Blazers send
Grant + Reath

Bucks shed just a little salary, but get a more reliable (healthy) F in Grant. Dame & Grant have a good relationship.
Reath gives the Bucks an extra backup big who can spread the floor.

Blazers make this swap solely for contracts. Middleton can opt out in June (expiring) or more than likely has 1.5 seasons left. The Reath/Johnson swap just gives Portland another prospect to see if they will develop.

Bumping this idea - since I didn't see any Bucks fans chime in....

I'm going to change the proposal a bit though:

Middleton + Tyler Smith
for
Grant

OR

Middleton + Tyler Smith + Beauchamp + '31 2nd pick swap (Blazers get better)
for
Grant + Reath (or Walker, or Banton)

The inclusion of Smith provides value to Blazers. If Bucks want some extra depth (Reath, Walker, or Banton) - then Beauchamp would need to be included for salary reasons.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,256
And1: 25,403
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: MIL | POR 

Post#7 » by Baddy Chuck » Sat Dec 21, 2024 1:44 pm

tester551 wrote:Bumping this idea - since I didn't see any Bucks fans chime in....

Despite being 3 years younger (ie heading into historically more injury prone years), the last four seasons Jerami Grant has played in less games than Middleton, he's been a worse player when either are on the court and he's owed more money. I'd pass. Personally, I think the more the Denver varnish fades off of Grant people are realizing he's just not a very impactful, or for lack of a better word good, player and his contract looks hilariously bad. If Midds is completely washed at least like you said we only have him as an expiring franchise legend after this season where Grant could largely be an unmovable level deal for the remainder of his deal, a swap would just dig the knife deeper IMO. Call me a homer if you like but also with that said, I think Midds has a better chance of helping the Bucks than Grant. One double ankle surgery ago sure, but 6 months ago he was leading us in the playoffs (25 ppg on good efficiency) with Giannis and Dame out. I just don't think Grant has that gear. Giving up value for the swap of the two guys seems even sillier.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
DeBlazerRiddem
Forum Mod - Blazers
Forum Mod - Blazers
Posts: 14,612
And1: 6,605
Joined: Mar 11, 2010

Re: MIL | POR 

Post#8 » by DeBlazerRiddem » Sat Dec 21, 2024 3:37 pm

When people say a player is injury prone are they just looking at games played or are they looking at actual injuries? I ask because Grant has not gotten any real injuries in Portland but he has missed a good number of games because we have been blatantly tanking.
Blaze the Nugz
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,748
And1: 117
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: MIL | POR 

Post#9 » by Blaze the Nugz » Sat Dec 21, 2024 10:10 pm

DeBlazerRiddem wrote:When people say a player is injury prone are they just looking at games played or are they looking at actual injuries? I ask because Grant has not gotten any real injuries in Portland but he has missed a good number of games because we have been blatantly tanking.

Exactly. Nobody who follows the Blazers would say JG has been injury prone in his time in Portland. Rather, the tank commanders have decided to sit JG, who would otherwise add a few undesired wins.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,786
And1: 10,442
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: MIL | POR 

Post#10 » by Myth » Sun Dec 22, 2024 2:58 am

DeBlazerRiddem wrote:When people say a player is injury prone are they just looking at games played or are they looking at actual injuries? I ask because Grant has not gotten any real injuries in Portland but he has missed a good number of games because we have been blatantly tanking.

Blazers: “How you feeling today?”
Grant: “Meh.”
Blazers: “You better sit out.”
Xanadu
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,632
And1: 453
Joined: Dec 30, 2014
     

Re: MIL | POR 

Post#11 » by Xanadu » Tue Dec 24, 2024 4:43 pm

As bucks fan I would hope horst hangs up quickly. Middleton is not only a proven fit on the court but locker room wise as well. In order for the Bucks to move Middleton it needs to raise of the hypothetical ceiling of this years squad. Grant has value but has largely been a empty stats on bad teams guy since Denver. Also I hate how much other fans undervalue Middleton due to his injuries. Look is he a injury risk of course but that doesn't take away from his proben playoff performance. What does Grant bring to this team that would help our match up with the Celtics in the ECF. People will bring up perimeter defense but I don't really agree with that. Grant has been playing the role of a number one on lottery teams for so long now. Do people really think he will be able to just seamlessly go back to elite role player status? Finally Middleton is basically the perfect off ball fit for a Giannis Dame offense. His ability as off the catch shooter and connective passer is largely overlooked. Finally he is proven Celtics killer so yeah.
Bucks fandom bringing me happiness still seems like a dream.
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,153
And1: 3,111
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: MIL | POR 

Post#12 » by PDXKnight » Wed Dec 25, 2024 10:19 pm

Myth wrote:
DeBlazerRiddem wrote:When people say a player is injury prone are they just looking at games played or are they looking at actual injuries? I ask because Grant has not gotten any real injuries in Portland but he has missed a good number of games because we have been blatantly tanking.

Blazers: “How you feeling today?”
Grant: “Meh.”
Blazers: “You better sit out.”


Lol exactly
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,098
And1: 4,359
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: MIL | POR 

Post#13 » by Tim Lehrbach » Wed Dec 25, 2024 10:28 pm

Yeah, the good news is Grant is not injury-prone. The bad news is he's not particularly prone to playing good basketball anymore, either.
Clipsz 4 Life
January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006
Saxon
February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
User avatar
JayMKE
RealGM
Posts: 29,265
And1: 17,091
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: LA
     

Re: MIL | POR 

Post#14 » by JayMKE » Thu Dec 26, 2024 6:33 pm

Grant at 30 isn’t a guy I’m trying to make a core piece, don’t think he’s an upgrade over Khris and has A longer contract? Pass.
FREE GIANNIS

Return to Trades and Transactions