BlacJacMac wrote:winforlose wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:
So now you've moved the goalposts all the way from "most important" to "functional"?
I don't even know how to respond to that...
Speaking of moving the goal post, here is what I said “ You win or lose at the PG and C and our rotations are deficient in both.”
Edit to add: one more quote from myself from above to prevent further misquotes “ For the reasons stated above PG and C are the most important for any team. When you fail at those positions everything gets significantly harder.”
And this direct quote from Post #546:
"I didn’t say you only need a PG and C, I said they are the most important positions."
My goalposts remain firmly planted.
I even edited my last post to include that quote. It doesn’t mean your best players need to be a PG and C, it means you cannot be deficient in those positions. If you fail at PG or C you make things much harder. We fail at both every game. Go back and read my posts from late last week I said the same thing. There is a reason teams keep trying to upgrade their PGs and Cs.










