What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,550
- And1: 5,081
- Joined: Nov 04, 2017
-
What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
What trade do you guys think the Lakers should make after the DFS trade?
I feel like the DFS deal takes us out of the race for a #3 guy since DLO cold have been a nice expiring.
Unless we are moving Rui and are interested in BI or Lavine. I don't see those deals anymore, but let me know if you think that is the right idea
The most glaring need is a backup C
I was hoping we got back Sharpe in that deal instead of Shake, but we didnt have enough w/o moving a 29 1st and that wouldnt be worth it
Some names that I can think or that pop up
Centers:
Rw3
Kessler
Vuc
Myles Turner
Jakob
Isaiah Stewart
Jonas V
Low end names like Alex Len, Nick Richards, Kevon Looney
Then its a guard off the bench. Preferably a more physical one than AR or even Christie
Lonzo:
Bruce Brown:
Sexton:
Marcs Smart:
Nembhard:
I wish we got a higher end wing than DFS, but feels like that was our main move on the wings.
Dillon Brooks and Wiggins were my ideal wings if one of those teams made a Butler move, but that seems done.
Deandre Hunter is all that is left that I can think of a reasonable role guy, but wouldnt make sense after a DFS deal
I feel like the DFS deal takes us out of the race for a #3 guy since DLO cold have been a nice expiring.
Unless we are moving Rui and are interested in BI or Lavine. I don't see those deals anymore, but let me know if you think that is the right idea
The most glaring need is a backup C
I was hoping we got back Sharpe in that deal instead of Shake, but we didnt have enough w/o moving a 29 1st and that wouldnt be worth it
Some names that I can think or that pop up
Centers:
Rw3
Kessler
Vuc
Myles Turner
Jakob
Isaiah Stewart
Jonas V
Low end names like Alex Len, Nick Richards, Kevon Looney
Then its a guard off the bench. Preferably a more physical one than AR or even Christie
Lonzo:
Bruce Brown:
Sexton:
Marcs Smart:
Nembhard:
I wish we got a higher end wing than DFS, but feels like that was our main move on the wings.
Dillon Brooks and Wiggins were my ideal wings if one of those teams made a Butler move, but that seems done.
Deandre Hunter is all that is left that I can think of a reasonable role guy, but wouldnt make sense after a DFS deal
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,930
- And1: 5,998
- Joined: Nov 07, 2003
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
I think a Jared Vanderbilt for Timelord trade could be interesting. In a lot of ways it’s a roster balancing trade for each side. Portland might object to the extra 2 years in Vando’s deal, but he’s 2 years younger and up until last year has been durable. Timelord is 20 MPG backup who’s always hurt, but we have seen him have a big impact when healthy come playoff time. The money also works nicely. Valancunis can also make sense financially in a Vando swap. The other Cs either make too much money or will cost too much (Kessler) unless you’re doing a Rui for Stewart swap. But I think Rui fits better than Vando if your bringing in a C.
With the guard off the bench, if you’re looking for a point of attack defender, not sure there is a Gabe Vincent upgrade out there. If your looking for playmaking, Jordan Clarkson could be interesting.
With the guard off the bench, if you’re looking for a point of attack defender, not sure there is a Gabe Vincent upgrade out there. If your looking for playmaking, Jordan Clarkson could be interesting.
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
- JMAC3
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,224
- And1: 6,242
- Joined: May 22, 2010
-
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
If they can get a scoring punch guard off the bench and a slight upgrade at bench center that would really round up their team.
Both guys can be pretty flawed players, just need to fill those roles and be able to play 20+ mpg.
Both guys can be pretty flawed players, just need to fill those roles and be able to play 20+ mpg.
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,471
- And1: 43,618
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
PG: Reaves (36) | G (12)
SG: Christie (30) | G (18)
SF: DFS (36) | Knecht (12)
PF: LeBron (36) | Davis (12)
C : Davis (24) | C (24)
Lakers could go for a C that can play 24 minutes in playoffs. They'd need to be able to shoot and stretch floor.
Lakers could go for G that can play 20-30 minutes in playoffs. They'd need to be able to defend and playmake.
Biggest tradeable salaries: Rui 17m, Vando 10.7m, Vincent 11m
SG: Christie (30) | G (18)
SF: DFS (36) | Knecht (12)
PF: LeBron (36) | Davis (12)
C : Davis (24) | C (24)
Lakers could go for a C that can play 24 minutes in playoffs. They'd need to be able to shoot and stretch floor.
Lakers could go for G that can play 20-30 minutes in playoffs. They'd need to be able to defend and playmake.
Biggest tradeable salaries: Rui 17m, Vando 10.7m, Vincent 11m
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,336
- And1: 11,248
- Joined: May 19, 2017
-
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
zimpy27 wrote:PG: Reaves (36) | G (12)
SG: Christie (30) | G (18)
SF: DFS (36) | Knecht (12)
PF: LeBron (36) | Davis (12)
C : Davis (24) | C (24)
Lakers could go for a C that can play 24 minutes in playoffs. They'd need to be able to shoot and stretch floor.
Lakers could go for G that can play 20-30 minutes in playoffs. They'd need to be able to defend and playmake.
Biggest tradeable salaries: Rui 17m, Vando 10.7m, Vincent 11m
Shake should definitely be in the Lakers' rotation.
He's been better than Russell this year...
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,471
- And1: 43,618
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
I think Vuc is the only realistic big in OP. I'd add Jalen Smith.
The C needs to be able hit 3s to stretch floor a bit to play with Davis, which would be required if they want to play more than 10mpg in playoffs. Myles too expensive and Stewart has bad blood with team.
The C needs to be able hit 3s to stretch floor a bit to play with Davis, which would be required if they want to play more than 10mpg in playoffs. Myles too expensive and Stewart has bad blood with team.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,550
- And1: 1,994
- Joined: Mar 02, 2001
- Contact:
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
Bring in Lonnie Walker for a tryout and then see what you can do leading to the deadline
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
- Posts: 30,310
- And1: 9,873
- Joined: Aug 14, 2004
- Location: South Florida
-
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
JV from WIzards works for Vanderbilt. Not perfect for either team but Wiz can take on that salary and Lakers get an upgrade that can give Davis some rest and upgrade the bench. Would cost a protected 1st as Vanderbilt with his salary and injury status is a bit on the negative worth side in the deal. Wiz can throw back a 2nd or two.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 229
- And1: 74
- Joined: Jan 09, 2019
-
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
In regards to the backup big, Nick Richards for Hayes, JHS and a couple of seconds would do just fine
I'd love to add another volume guard/wing scorer, but only having the firsts would mean we need to go somewhat big
I'd love to add another volume guard/wing scorer, but only having the firsts would mean we need to go somewhat big
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,471
- And1: 43,618
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
penbeast0 wrote:JV from WIzards works for Vanderbilt. Not perfect for either team but Wiz can take on that salary and Lakers get an upgrade that can give Davis some rest and upgrade the bench. Would cost a protected 1st as Vanderbilt with his salary and injury status is a bit on the negative worth side in the deal. Wiz can throw back a 2nd or two.
I believe Lakers offered VIncent and SRPs for Val. I think the DFS move is a signal that they've moved on from Val.
If they give up an FRP for a big then it will be a big that can stretch the floor so that Davis can play 15-20 mpg a night with them.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,049
- And1: 5,555
- Joined: Jun 03, 2023
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
They don't need a 5, that just encourages them to play AD out of his natural position more.
What they really need is another 3&D guy, but better than DFS. Since that's probably unobtainable, their biggest need is the 2023 version of Gabe Vincent. Someone like DiVancenzo off the bench would be great too, but obviously he's not obtainable.
What they really need is another 3&D guy, but better than DFS. Since that's probably unobtainable, their biggest need is the 2023 version of Gabe Vincent. Someone like DiVancenzo off the bench would be great too, but obviously he's not obtainable.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 229
- And1: 74
- Joined: Jan 09, 2019
-
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
One_and_Done wrote:They don't need a 5, that just encourages them to play AD out of his natural position more.
What they really need is another 3&D guy, but better than DFS. Since that's probably unobtainable, their biggest need is the 2023 version of Gabe Vincent. Someone like DiVancenzo off the bench would be great too, but obviously he's not obtainable.
We do need an upgrade on Hayes, but yeah we shouldn’t be spending our firsts on a big
DDV isn’t exactly balling out for Minny, from memory? They could maybe look to move on from him I guess
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,057
- And1: 5,694
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
KuzControl wrote:One_and_Done wrote:They don't need a 5, that just encourages them to play AD out of his natural position more.
What they really need is another 3&D guy, but better than DFS. Since that's probably unobtainable, their biggest need is the 2023 version of Gabe Vincent. Someone like DiVancenzo off the bench would be great too, but obviously he's not obtainable.
We do need an upgrade on Hayes, but yeah we shouldn’t be spending our firsts on a big
DDV isn’t exactly balling out for Minny, from memory? They could maybe look to move on from him I guess
Lakers don’t have anything Wolves want. Plus the deal would be very tricky with 2nd apron.
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,786
- And1: 10,442
- Joined: Oct 01, 2008
-
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
Time to trade for Ayton.
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,551
- And1: 13,911
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
R-DAWG wrote:I think a Jared Vanderbilt for Timelord trade could be interesting. In a lot of ways it’s a roster balancing trade for each side. Portland might object to the extra 2 years in Vando’s deal, but he’s 2 years younger and up until last year has been durable. Timelord is 20 MPG backup who’s always hurt, but we have seen him have a big impact when healthy come playoff time. The money also works nicely. Valancunis can also make sense financially in a Vando swap. The other Cs either make too much money or will cost too much (Kessler) unless you’re doing a Rui for Stewart swap. But I think Rui fits better than Vando if your bringing in a C.
With the guard off the bench, if you’re looking for a point of attack defender, not sure there is a Gabe Vincent upgrade out there. If your looking for playmaking, Jordan Clarkson could be interesting.
Zero interest for POR.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,658
- And1: 5,065
- Joined: Jan 07, 2012
- Location: Atl
-
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
Myth wrote:Time to trade for Ayton.
That’s a funny way of spelling Robert Williams lol
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,587
- And1: 4,418
- Joined: Jun 19, 2012
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
Just please no for Jonas
My Go Team
Magic, Jordan, Pippen, Duncan, Shaq
My Counter
Stockton, Kobe, Bird, Rodman, Dirk
Today's Team
Luka, SGA, Tatum, Giannis, Wemby
Magic, Jordan, Pippen, Duncan, Shaq
My Counter
Stockton, Kobe, Bird, Rodman, Dirk
Today's Team
Luka, SGA, Tatum, Giannis, Wemby
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,587
- And1: 4,418
- Joined: Jun 19, 2012
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
Myth wrote:Time to trade for Ayton.
If he was half the price of his contract, maybe rather use the pics for Kessler


My Go Team
Magic, Jordan, Pippen, Duncan, Shaq
My Counter
Stockton, Kobe, Bird, Rodman, Dirk
Today's Team
Luka, SGA, Tatum, Giannis, Wemby
Magic, Jordan, Pippen, Duncan, Shaq
My Counter
Stockton, Kobe, Bird, Rodman, Dirk
Today's Team
Luka, SGA, Tatum, Giannis, Wemby
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,203
- And1: 669
- Joined: Jan 02, 2015
-
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
I would fo hard after Kessler for JHS, Hayes and a 1st.
Would balance out entire frontcourt without giving up guys that actually play.
Maybe add a min guy such as Dennis Smith Jr, Lonnie Walker or Markelle Fultz.
Would balance out entire frontcourt without giving up guys that actually play.
Maybe add a min guy such as Dennis Smith Jr, Lonnie Walker or Markelle Fultz.
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,203
- And1: 669
- Joined: Jan 02, 2015
-
Re: What Should The Lakers Next Move Be?
zimpy27 wrote:PG: Reaves (36) | G (12)
SG: Christie (30) | G (18)
SF: DFS (36) | Knecht (12)
PF: LeBron (36) | Davis (12)
C : Davis (24) | C (24)
Lakers could go for a C that can play 24 minutes in playoffs. They'd need to be able to shoot and stretch floor.
Lakers could go for G that can play 20-30 minutes in playoffs. They'd need to be able to defend and playmake.
Biggest tradeable salaries: Rui 17m, Vando 10.7m, Vincent 11m
Kessler for JHS/Hayes/1st
Lately Gabe has actually looked somewhat like the version the had hoped for when they signed him, so perhaps it would be wise to see how a rotation of Reaves-Christie with Gabe-Shake as backups work.
Could consider a guy like Olynyk?
Return to Trades and Transactions