[quote="axeman23"]I agree there's likely not "a dozen better offers out there", but you only need 1, not a dozen. And as I said, both Clowney and Sharpe Are young. inexpensive, and ideal for a rebuilding team like the Nets in this scenario. I personally see Minny getting too much back for Randle, and Detroit not kicking in enough to be getting their end, either. I mean, we already know what Harris is: decent counting stats, but not a first or 2nd option for a team trying to win. Sasser is a decent young combo guard still putting things together, and probably has value off the bench as a role player. But still I don't see expiring salary, a top 10 protected swap, and a top 10 (for 2 years) pick with NO young potential talent coming INTO Brooklyn as the top offer, especially when this has 2 of their promising young guys heading OUT. I could talk myself into this being a trade for Cam J if nothing else presented itself. I just don't see why Brooklyn would also throw in Sharpe and Clowney. It's not for roster spots, and if it was they'd throw in someone else, I'm sure. So why? I mean, I'd try to get them included in a Cleveland deal for Cam J (why seems like a sub-optimal fit anyway...), but I could see why Brooklyn would baulk at including them without additional value.[/quote]
Does having Detroit send three seconds to bkn instead of Minnesota even it out?
I think this deal fits Detroit’s goal of reaching playoffs. I don’t see them winning enough to lower their pick into the twenty plus range. So, Bkn would probably be swapping a 25ish pick for 15ish this year and getting a pick next year in 13-18 range. That seems like good value.
Barring deals, bkn will be adding four first rounders to the roster. Which should provide a solid talent base for the team to develop, filling the role of guys like clowney and sharpe. Currently 7, 16, 25, 27. This deal should make the 7 a little better (6 unless one of the top five tanking teams win a few). Detroit would improve which might allow the swap of 27 for 15 or so. Picks in the teens are much better than twenty or lower, gives a chance at a knecht, McCain, Sengun, etc. So, I see solid value in the picks that Bkn could get.
Detroit wins playing Minnesota retools. Brooklyn gets assets
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: Detroit wins playing Minnesota retools. Brooklyn gets assets
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,642
- And1: 469
- Joined: Jun 10, 2005
Re: Detroit wins playing Minnesota retools. Brooklyn gets assets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,220
- And1: 5,763
- Joined: Mar 25, 2011
-
Re: Detroit wins playing Minnesota retools. Brooklyn gets assets
As a Nets fan, I want no part of this deal.
Re: Detroit wins playing Minnesota retools. Brooklyn gets assets
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,086
- And1: 1,997
- Joined: Nov 03, 2014
-
Re: Detroit wins playing Minnesota retools. Brooklyn gets assets
Xman wrote:Canadafan wrote:Call me crazy but we get rid of our 2 worst starting forwards and upgrade them whilst also getting back our 1st rounder. Win-win
The first and a swap going to bkn
Ah, i see. That's a bummer
Re: Detroit wins playing Minnesota retools. Brooklyn gets assets
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,642
- And1: 469
- Joined: Jun 10, 2005
Re: Detroit wins playing Minnesota retools. Brooklyn gets assets
[quote="DarkXaero"]As a Nets fan, I want no part of this deal.[/quote]
I get riding out the tank. Probably best route. But, if new owners want to win some now then this seems to fill the gap while forwards develop (amen, holland).
I get riding out the tank. Probably best route. But, if new owners want to win some now then this seems to fill the gap while forwards develop (amen, holland).
Return to Trades and Transactions