pingpongrac wrote:gp2015 wrote:djsunyc wrote:how far away is IQ from trae? could he get into that area of impact?
Let's not compare him to Trae. Trae is a low efficiency, no defense, empty stats player.
I'm hoping IQ will be a better overall player, even if he's not as good offensively.
I’m not sure how you can call Trae an inefficient player when he’s at 58 TS% while averaging 25 PPG for his career thus far. That is really good for a player of his size and position — especially on high volume — and even in a down year so far he’s at 56 TS%. He turns the ball over a lot (2nd most in the NBA this season), but he also leads the league in assists by a wide margin (2.3 more than Jokic and Cade who are 2 and 3). The big issue with Trae has always been on the defensive end, but he has been only a slightly negative impact player on that end the past few seasons.
When it comes to Quickley, he’s probably never going to reach Trae’s level on the offensive end because he doesn’t have the same playmaking abilities. I think he can be a really good player that gives you 20/5/7 type numbers in his prime while holding his own on the defensive end though which would be a really good #3. He’s probably our 2nd best player now, so it’s been wild to me that so many people were trashing his game/predicting that Shead and/or Mitchell could replace him.
Issue with Trae is his game is really difficult to translate over to the playoffs. His 58 TS% is above league average which is good especially for his position but his eFG% of 50.5% career is not so great. Relying on FT's in the Playoffs is not really the recipe for success as we have seen with someone like Derozan. He's played 27 playoff games and he's put up 46 eFG% and 53 TS% so it's a pretty significant drop.

















