Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
-
spree2kawhi
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,689
- And1: 5,808
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- DOT
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 31,609
- And1: 61,608
- Joined: Nov 25, 2016
-
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
Guano wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Guano wrote:
I'm many deplorable things and 1 of them is a unabashed starphucker.
That said Jimmy is too old and I love og too much. I wouldn't do it. Even though I was vv tempted.
Now mikal for jimmy.....
Have some shame, Jimmy is taking 2 threes per game over the last 2 seasons and he's 7 years older than Mikal.
Let me starphuck in peace
BaF Lakers:
Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela
Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela
Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- TheGreenArrow
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,892
- And1: 43,522
- Joined: Sep 13, 2017
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- stuporman
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,055
- And1: 21,083
- Joined: Nov 27, 2005
- Location: optimistic skeptical realist
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
Some people can't help themselves in always wanting to bring in players that will destroy the team because of what I suspect is a misery fetish.
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
?Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 82,379
- And1: 96,340
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
Looking forward to more bullsh*t takes, accusations of pedophilia and internet white knighting. Keep up the "good" work.
On the plus side, reading this topic makes me pray harder for the giant meteor.
Can't happen soon enough.
On the plus side, reading this topic makes me pray harder for the giant meteor.
Can't happen soon enough.

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- Jalen Bluntson
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,506
- And1: 27,208
- Joined: Nov 07, 2012
-
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
thebuzzardman wrote:Looking forward to more bullsh*t takes, accusations of pedophilia and internet white knighting. Keep up the "good" work.
On the plus side, reading this topic makes me pray harder for the giant meteor.
Can't happen soon enough.
Holy shyt this thread went south. I went back and looked up what you just described. That's how we do New Year's day around here now? Glad I missed it. Juvenile trolling about pedophilia. Jesus.
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- Chanel Bomber
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,902
- And1: 42,015
- Joined: Sep 20, 2018
-
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
Some people clearly don't understand the situation. Let me try to explain.
Over time, several posters have grown to dislike this one person, and they have asked explicitly and on numerous occasions that he leaves them alone. It's a fair ask - because nothing prevents this poster from enjoying the board experience with the people who want to exchange with him (as he's entitled to), and it serves to prevent escalation for the sake of the board at large. Yet, that poster keeps mentioning them, replying to them, shaming them, against their will. Then it's no longer a consensual interaction. That person may justify it in their head because they think they are on a higher moral plane of existence, but the reality is that it is just obsessive behavior. Just because this is supposedly "the commons" doesn't meant we're entitled to harassing people and shaming people.
So when this person comes in here to express outrage and yet again shame these posters and over the term "hive" or "barbs" in a fight thread that was created specifically for chitposting after his complaints (and others'), how is that fair? Especially when you consider this was one of the people whose complaints led to the very creation of this thread by the mods? So if this is the last bastion for chit posting on this board, at least have the decency not to come and ruin it, if your ego can't bear such nasty words like "hive" or "barb". Clearly this place isn't for him, so why come here and destroy it? Not everything is about him.
So yes, the confluence of those two dynamics led to this escalation. Some people are just sick of him and want to be left alone. Since the message isn't heard or respected, people will resort to other ways to create this distance. Including by being nasty, if that's what it takes.
This doesn't come from nowhere.
Over time, several posters have grown to dislike this one person, and they have asked explicitly and on numerous occasions that he leaves them alone. It's a fair ask - because nothing prevents this poster from enjoying the board experience with the people who want to exchange with him (as he's entitled to), and it serves to prevent escalation for the sake of the board at large. Yet, that poster keeps mentioning them, replying to them, shaming them, against their will. Then it's no longer a consensual interaction. That person may justify it in their head because they think they are on a higher moral plane of existence, but the reality is that it is just obsessive behavior. Just because this is supposedly "the commons" doesn't meant we're entitled to harassing people and shaming people.
So when this person comes in here to express outrage and yet again shame these posters and over the term "hive" or "barbs" in a fight thread that was created specifically for chitposting after his complaints (and others'), how is that fair? Especially when you consider this was one of the people whose complaints led to the very creation of this thread by the mods? So if this is the last bastion for chit posting on this board, at least have the decency not to come and ruin it, if your ego can't bear such nasty words like "hive" or "barb". Clearly this place isn't for him, so why come here and destroy it? Not everything is about him.
So yes, the confluence of those two dynamics led to this escalation. Some people are just sick of him and want to be left alone. Since the message isn't heard or respected, people will resort to other ways to create this distance. Including by being nasty, if that's what it takes.
This doesn't come from nowhere.
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- 3toheadmelo
- RealGM
- Posts: 96,152
- And1: 137,947
- Joined: Feb 15, 2015
-
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
Chanel Bomber wrote:Some people clearly don't understand the situation. Let me try to explain.
Over time, several posters have grown to dislike this one person, and they have asked explicitly and on numerous occasions that he leaves them alone. It's a fair ask - because nothing prevents this poster from enjoying the board experience with the people who want to exchange with him (as he's entitled to), and it serves to prevent escalation for the sake of the board at large. Yet, that poster keeps mentioning them, replying to them, shaming them, against their will. Then it's no longer a consensual interaction. That person may justify it in their head because they think they are on a higher moral plane of existence, but the reality is that it is just obsessive behavior. Just because this is supposedly "the commons" doesn't meant we're entitled to harassing people and shaming people.
So when this person comes in here to express outrage and yet again shame these posters and over the term "hive" or "barbs" in a fight thread that was created specifically for chitposting after his complaints (and others'), how is that fair? Especially when you consider this was one of the people whose complaints led to the very creation of this thread by the mods? So if this is the last bastion for chit posting on this board, at least have the decency not to come and ruin it, if your ego can't bear such nasty words like "hive" or "barb". Clearly this place isn't for him, so why come here and destroy it? Not everything is about him.
So yes, the confluence of those two dynamics led to this escalation. Some people are just sick of him and want to be left alone. Since the message isn't heard or respected, people will resort to other ways to create this distance. Including by being nasty, if that's what it takes.
This doesn't come from nowhere.
Perfectly said

It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- Jalen Bluntson
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,506
- And1: 27,208
- Joined: Nov 07, 2012
-
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
Chanel Bomber wrote:Some people clearly don't understand the situation. Let me try to explain.
Over time, several posters dislike this one poster, and they have asked explicitly and on numerous occasions that he leaves them alone. It's a fair ask - because nothing prevents this poster from enjoying the board experience with the people who want to exchange with him (as he's entitled to), and it serves to prevent escalation for the sake of the board at large. Yet, that poster keeps mentioning them, replying to them, shaming them, against their will. Then it's no longer a consensual interaction. That person may justify it in their head because they think they are on a higher moral plane of existence, but the reality is that it is just obsessive behavior. Just because this is supposedly "the commons" doesn't meant we're entitled to harassing people and shaming people.
So when this person comes in here to express outrage and yet again shame these posters and over the term "hive" or "barbs" in a fight thread that was created specifically for chitposting after his complaints (and others'), how is that fair? Especially when you consider this was one of the people whose complaints led to the very creation of this thread by the mods? So if this is the last bastion for chit posting on this board, at least have the decency not to come and ruin it, if your ego can't bear such nasty words like "hive" or "barb". Clearly this place isn't for him, so why come here and destroy it? Not everything is about him.
So yes, the confluence of those two dynamics led to this escalation. Some people are just sick of him and want to be left alone. Since the message isn't heard or respected, people will resort to other ways to create this distance. Including by being nasty, if that's what it takes.
This doesn't come from nowhere.
I just want to give everyone a big hug and take us all out for ice cream!
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 82,379
- And1: 96,340
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
Chanel Bomber wrote:Some people clearly don't understand the situation. Let me try to explain.
Over time, several posters have grown to dislike this one person, and they have asked explicitly and on numerous occasions that he leaves them alone. It's a fair ask - because nothing prevents this poster from enjoying the board experience with the people who want to exchange with him (as he's entitled to), and it serves to prevent escalation for the sake of the board at large. Yet, that poster keeps mentioning them, replying to them, shaming them, against their will. Then it's no longer a consensual interaction. That person may justify it in their head because they think they are on a higher moral plane of existence, but the reality is that it is just obsessive behavior. Just because this is supposedly "the commons" doesn't meant we're entitled to harassing people and shaming people.
So when this person comes in here to express outrage and yet again shame these posters and over the term "hive" or "barbs" in a fight thread that was created specifically for chitposting after his complaints (and others'), how is that fair? Especially when you consider this was one of the people whose complaints led to the very creation of this thread by the mods? So if this is the last bastion for chit posting on this board, at least have the decency not to come and ruin it, if your ego can't bear such nasty words like "hive" or "barb". Clearly this place isn't for him, so why come here and destroy it? Not everything is about him.
So yes, the confluence of those two dynamics led to this escalation. Some people are just sick of him and want to be left alone. Since the message isn't heard or respected, people will resort to other ways to create this distance. Including by being nasty, if that's what it takes.
This doesn't come from nowhere.
It's all bullsh*t and so is this post. A gigantic circle jerk, like so much on here.
And people wonder why I troll.

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- stuporman
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,055
- And1: 21,083
- Joined: Nov 27, 2005
- Location: optimistic skeptical realist
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
Did Chanel just try to TS% sh**posting? I think they just might have...hmmm
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
?Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 82,379
- And1: 96,340
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
Jalen Bluntson wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Some people clearly don't understand the situation. Let me try to explain.
Over time, several posters dislike this one poster, and they have asked explicitly and on numerous occasions that he leaves them alone. It's a fair ask - because nothing prevents this poster from enjoying the board experience with the people who want to exchange with him (as he's entitled to), and it serves to prevent escalation for the sake of the board at large. Yet, that poster keeps mentioning them, replying to them, shaming them, against their will. Then it's no longer a consensual interaction. That person may justify it in their head because they think they are on a higher moral plane of existence, but the reality is that it is just obsessive behavior. Just because this is supposedly "the commons" doesn't meant we're entitled to harassing people and shaming people.
So when this person comes in here to express outrage and yet again shame these posters and over the term "hive" or "barbs" in a fight thread that was created specifically for chitposting after his complaints (and others'), how is that fair? Especially when you consider this was one of the people whose complaints led to the very creation of this thread by the mods? So if this is the last bastion for chit posting on this board, at least have the decency not to come and ruin it, if your ego can't bear such nasty words like "hive" or "barb". Clearly this place isn't for him, so why come here and destroy it? Not everything is about him.
So yes, the confluence of those two dynamics led to this escalation. Some people are just sick of him and want to be left alone. Since the message isn't heard or respected, people will resort to other ways to create this distance. Including by being nasty, if that's what it takes.
This doesn't come from nowhere.
I just want to give everyone a big hug and take us all out for ice cream!
F*ck your ice cream too.

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 82,379
- And1: 96,340
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
stuporman wrote:Did Chanel just try to TS% sh**posting? I think they just might have...hmmm
It was nicely written.
Like, if Mein Kampf was written by Shakespeare.

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- stuporman
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,055
- And1: 21,083
- Joined: Nov 27, 2005
- Location: optimistic skeptical realist
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
thebuzzardman wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Some people clearly don't understand the situation. Let me try to explain.
Over time, several posters dislike this one poster, and they have asked explicitly and on numerous occasions that he leaves them alone. It's a fair ask - because nothing prevents this poster from enjoying the board experience with the people who want to exchange with him (as he's entitled to), and it serves to prevent escalation for the sake of the board at large. Yet, that poster keeps mentioning them, replying to them, shaming them, against their will. Then it's no longer a consensual interaction. That person may justify it in their head because they think they are on a higher moral plane of existence, but the reality is that it is just obsessive behavior. Just because this is supposedly "the commons" doesn't meant we're entitled to harassing people and shaming people.
So when this person comes in here to express outrage and yet again shame these posters and over the term "hive" or "barbs" in a fight thread that was created specifically for chitposting after his complaints (and others'), how is that fair? Especially when you consider this was one of the people whose complaints led to the very creation of this thread by the mods? So if this is the last bastion for chit posting on this board, at least have the decency not to come and ruin it, if your ego can't bear such nasty words like "hive" or "barb". Clearly this place isn't for him, so why come here and destroy it? Not everything is about him.
So yes, the confluence of those two dynamics led to this escalation. Some people are just sick of him and want to be left alone. Since the message isn't heard or respected, people will resort to other ways to create this distance. Including by being nasty, if that's what it takes.
This doesn't come from nowhere.
I just want to give everyone a big hug and take us all out for ice cream!
F*ck your ice cream too.

If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
?Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- Jalen Bluntson
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,506
- And1: 27,208
- Joined: Nov 07, 2012
-
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- Fury
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,727
- And1: 18,733
- Joined: Mar 07, 2007
-
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
Thread hasn't gone far enough.
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 82,379
- And1: 96,340
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
Mods should just mass ban everyone with more than 20,000 posts.
They'd all be guilty of something.
Clean this place right up.
They'd all be guilty of something.
Clean this place right up.

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- robillionaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,345
- And1: 58,026
- Joined: Jul 12, 2015
- Location: Asheville
-
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
thebuzzardman wrote:
It's all bullsh*t and so is this post. A gigantic circle jerk, like so much on here.
And people wonder why I troll.
You’re just hiding your bad negative nelly opinions behind the veil of sarcasm and trolling but I see right through it, hater!
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- robillionaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,345
- And1: 58,026
- Joined: Jul 12, 2015
- Location: Asheville
-
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
thebuzzardman wrote:Mods should just mass ban everyone with more than 20,000 posts.
They'd all be guilty of something.
Clean this place right up.
That’s a little overkill, personally I’d ban everyone with over 37,600 posts
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
- Jalen Bluntson
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,506
- And1: 27,208
- Joined: Nov 07, 2012
-
Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!
thebuzzardman wrote:Mods should just mass ban everyone with more than 20,000 posts.
They'd all be guilty of something.
Clean this place right up.
I did my time already! I'm not going back!!!!!














