ImageImageImageImageImage

Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!

Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks

spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,684
And1: 5,807
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1021 » by spree2kawhi » Fri Jan 3, 2025 11:52 am



If you want to beat Minnesota, you double Ant and trap Randle.
User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,602
And1: 61,600
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1022 » by DOT » Fri Jan 3, 2025 1:44 pm

Guano wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Guano wrote:
I'm many deplorable things and 1 of them is a unabashed starphucker.

That said Jimmy is too old and I love og too much. I wouldn't do it. Even though I was vv tempted.

Now mikal for jimmy.....




Have some shame, Jimmy is taking 2 threes per game over the last 2 seasons and he's 7 years older than Mikal.


Let me starphuck in peace

BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,890
And1: 43,521
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1023 » by TheGreenArrow » Fri Jan 3, 2025 2:08 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:

If you want to beat Minnesota, you double Ant and trap Randle.

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
User avatar
stuporman
RealGM
Posts: 32,054
And1: 21,080
Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Location: optimistic skeptical realist

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1024 » by stuporman » Fri Jan 3, 2025 3:17 pm

Some people can't help themselves in always wanting to bring in players that will destroy the team because of what I suspect is a misery fetish.
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
Image?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,373
And1: 96,337
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1025 » by thebuzzardman » Fri Jan 3, 2025 3:25 pm

Looking forward to more bullsh*t takes, accusations of pedophilia and internet white knighting. Keep up the "good" work.

On the plus side, reading this topic makes me pray harder for the giant meteor.

Can't happen soon enough.
Image
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,506
And1: 27,208
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1026 » by Jalen Bluntson » Fri Jan 3, 2025 5:04 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:Looking forward to more bullsh*t takes, accusations of pedophilia and internet white knighting. Keep up the "good" work.

On the plus side, reading this topic makes me pray harder for the giant meteor.

Can't happen soon enough.


Holy shyt this thread went south. I went back and looked up what you just described. That's how we do New Year's day around here now? Glad I missed it. Juvenile trolling about pedophilia. Jesus.
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
Chanel Bomber
RealGM
Posts: 23,902
And1: 42,015
Joined: Sep 20, 2018
 

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1027 » by Chanel Bomber » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:19 pm

Some people clearly don't understand the situation. Let me try to explain.

Over time, several posters have grown to dislike this one person, and they have asked explicitly and on numerous occasions that he leaves them alone. It's a fair ask - because nothing prevents this poster from enjoying the board experience with the people who want to exchange with him (as he's entitled to), and it serves to prevent escalation for the sake of the board at large. Yet, that poster keeps mentioning them, replying to them, shaming them, against their will. Then it's no longer a consensual interaction. That person may justify it in their head because they think they are on a higher moral plane of existence, but the reality is that it is just obsessive behavior. Just because this is supposedly "the commons" doesn't meant we're entitled to harassing people and shaming people.

So when this person comes in here to express outrage and yet again shame these posters and over the term "hive" or "barbs" in a fight thread that was created specifically for chitposting after his complaints (and others'), how is that fair? Especially when you consider this was one of the people whose complaints led to the very creation of this thread by the mods? So if this is the last bastion for chit posting on this board, at least have the decency not to come and ruin it, if your ego can't bear such nasty words like "hive" or "barb". Clearly this place isn't for him, so why come here and destroy it? Not everything is about him.

So yes, the confluence of those two dynamics led to this escalation. Some people are just sick of him and want to be left alone. Since the message isn't heard or respected, people will resort to other ways to create this distance. Including by being nasty, if that's what it takes.

This doesn't come from nowhere.
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 96,151
And1: 137,934
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1028 » by 3toheadmelo » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:26 pm

Chanel Bomber wrote:Some people clearly don't understand the situation. Let me try to explain.

Over time, several posters have grown to dislike this one person, and they have asked explicitly and on numerous occasions that he leaves them alone. It's a fair ask - because nothing prevents this poster from enjoying the board experience with the people who want to exchange with him (as he's entitled to), and it serves to prevent escalation for the sake of the board at large. Yet, that poster keeps mentioning them, replying to them, shaming them, against their will. Then it's no longer a consensual interaction. That person may justify it in their head because they think they are on a higher moral plane of existence, but the reality is that it is just obsessive behavior. Just because this is supposedly "the commons" doesn't meant we're entitled to harassing people and shaming people.

So when this person comes in here to express outrage and yet again shame these posters and over the term "hive" or "barbs" in a fight thread that was created specifically for chitposting after his complaints (and others'), how is that fair? Especially when you consider this was one of the people whose complaints led to the very creation of this thread by the mods? So if this is the last bastion for chit posting on this board, at least have the decency not to come and ruin it, if your ego can't bear such nasty words like "hive" or "barb". Clearly this place isn't for him, so why come here and destroy it? Not everything is about him.

So yes, the confluence of those two dynamics led to this escalation. Some people are just sick of him and want to be left alone. Since the message isn't heard or respected, people will resort to other ways to create this distance. Including by being nasty, if that's what it takes.

This doesn't come from nowhere.

Perfectly said
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,506
And1: 27,208
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1029 » by Jalen Bluntson » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:27 pm

Chanel Bomber wrote:Some people clearly don't understand the situation. Let me try to explain.

Over time, several posters dislike this one poster, and they have asked explicitly and on numerous occasions that he leaves them alone. It's a fair ask - because nothing prevents this poster from enjoying the board experience with the people who want to exchange with him (as he's entitled to), and it serves to prevent escalation for the sake of the board at large. Yet, that poster keeps mentioning them, replying to them, shaming them, against their will. Then it's no longer a consensual interaction. That person may justify it in their head because they think they are on a higher moral plane of existence, but the reality is that it is just obsessive behavior. Just because this is supposedly "the commons" doesn't meant we're entitled to harassing people and shaming people.

So when this person comes in here to express outrage and yet again shame these posters and over the term "hive" or "barbs" in a fight thread that was created specifically for chitposting after his complaints (and others'), how is that fair? Especially when you consider this was one of the people whose complaints led to the very creation of this thread by the mods? So if this is the last bastion for chit posting on this board, at least have the decency not to come and ruin it, if your ego can't bear such nasty words like "hive" or "barb". Clearly this place isn't for him, so why come here and destroy it? Not everything is about him.

So yes, the confluence of those two dynamics led to this escalation. Some people are just sick of him and want to be left alone. Since the message isn't heard or respected, people will resort to other ways to create this distance. Including by being nasty, if that's what it takes.

This doesn't come from nowhere.


I just want to give everyone a big hug and take us all out for ice cream!
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,373
And1: 96,337
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1030 » by thebuzzardman » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:39 pm

Chanel Bomber wrote:Some people clearly don't understand the situation. Let me try to explain.

Over time, several posters have grown to dislike this one person, and they have asked explicitly and on numerous occasions that he leaves them alone. It's a fair ask - because nothing prevents this poster from enjoying the board experience with the people who want to exchange with him (as he's entitled to), and it serves to prevent escalation for the sake of the board at large. Yet, that poster keeps mentioning them, replying to them, shaming them, against their will. Then it's no longer a consensual interaction. That person may justify it in their head because they think they are on a higher moral plane of existence, but the reality is that it is just obsessive behavior. Just because this is supposedly "the commons" doesn't meant we're entitled to harassing people and shaming people.

So when this person comes in here to express outrage and yet again shame these posters and over the term "hive" or "barbs" in a fight thread that was created specifically for chitposting after his complaints (and others'), how is that fair? Especially when you consider this was one of the people whose complaints led to the very creation of this thread by the mods? So if this is the last bastion for chit posting on this board, at least have the decency not to come and ruin it, if your ego can't bear such nasty words like "hive" or "barb". Clearly this place isn't for him, so why come here and destroy it? Not everything is about him.

So yes, the confluence of those two dynamics led to this escalation. Some people are just sick of him and want to be left alone. Since the message isn't heard or respected, people will resort to other ways to create this distance. Including by being nasty, if that's what it takes.

This doesn't come from nowhere.


It's all bullsh*t and so is this post. A gigantic circle jerk, like so much on here.

And people wonder why I troll.
Image
User avatar
stuporman
RealGM
Posts: 32,054
And1: 21,080
Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Location: optimistic skeptical realist

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1031 » by stuporman » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:39 pm

Did Chanel just try to TS% sh**posting? I think they just might have...hmmm
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
Image?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,373
And1: 96,337
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1032 » by thebuzzardman » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:39 pm

Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:Some people clearly don't understand the situation. Let me try to explain.

Over time, several posters dislike this one poster, and they have asked explicitly and on numerous occasions that he leaves them alone. It's a fair ask - because nothing prevents this poster from enjoying the board experience with the people who want to exchange with him (as he's entitled to), and it serves to prevent escalation for the sake of the board at large. Yet, that poster keeps mentioning them, replying to them, shaming them, against their will. Then it's no longer a consensual interaction. That person may justify it in their head because they think they are on a higher moral plane of existence, but the reality is that it is just obsessive behavior. Just because this is supposedly "the commons" doesn't meant we're entitled to harassing people and shaming people.

So when this person comes in here to express outrage and yet again shame these posters and over the term "hive" or "barbs" in a fight thread that was created specifically for chitposting after his complaints (and others'), how is that fair? Especially when you consider this was one of the people whose complaints led to the very creation of this thread by the mods? So if this is the last bastion for chit posting on this board, at least have the decency not to come and ruin it, if your ego can't bear such nasty words like "hive" or "barb". Clearly this place isn't for him, so why come here and destroy it? Not everything is about him.

So yes, the confluence of those two dynamics led to this escalation. Some people are just sick of him and want to be left alone. Since the message isn't heard or respected, people will resort to other ways to create this distance. Including by being nasty, if that's what it takes.

This doesn't come from nowhere.


I just want to give everyone a big hug and take us all out for ice cream!


F*ck your ice cream too.
Image
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,373
And1: 96,337
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1033 » by thebuzzardman » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:41 pm

stuporman wrote:Did Chanel just try to TS% sh**posting? I think they just might have...hmmm


It was nicely written.

Like, if Mein Kampf was written by Shakespeare.
Image
User avatar
stuporman
RealGM
Posts: 32,054
And1: 21,080
Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Location: optimistic skeptical realist

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1034 » by stuporman » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:45 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:Some people clearly don't understand the situation. Let me try to explain.

Over time, several posters dislike this one poster, and they have asked explicitly and on numerous occasions that he leaves them alone. It's a fair ask - because nothing prevents this poster from enjoying the board experience with the people who want to exchange with him (as he's entitled to), and it serves to prevent escalation for the sake of the board at large. Yet, that poster keeps mentioning them, replying to them, shaming them, against their will. Then it's no longer a consensual interaction. That person may justify it in their head because they think they are on a higher moral plane of existence, but the reality is that it is just obsessive behavior. Just because this is supposedly "the commons" doesn't meant we're entitled to harassing people and shaming people.

So when this person comes in here to express outrage and yet again shame these posters and over the term "hive" or "barbs" in a fight thread that was created specifically for chitposting after his complaints (and others'), how is that fair? Especially when you consider this was one of the people whose complaints led to the very creation of this thread by the mods? So if this is the last bastion for chit posting on this board, at least have the decency not to come and ruin it, if your ego can't bear such nasty words like "hive" or "barb". Clearly this place isn't for him, so why come here and destroy it? Not everything is about him.

So yes, the confluence of those two dynamics led to this escalation. Some people are just sick of him and want to be left alone. Since the message isn't heard or respected, people will resort to other ways to create this distance. Including by being nasty, if that's what it takes.

This doesn't come from nowhere.


I just want to give everyone a big hug and take us all out for ice cream!


F*ck your ice cream too.

Image
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
Image?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,506
And1: 27,208
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1035 » by Jalen Bluntson » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:48 pm

:rofl2:
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 24,727
And1: 18,733
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1036 » by Fury » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:53 pm

Thread hasn't gone far enough.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,373
And1: 96,337
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1037 » by thebuzzardman » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:54 pm

Mods should just mass ban everyone with more than 20,000 posts.
They'd all be guilty of something.
Clean this place right up.
Image
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 40,343
And1: 58,020
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1038 » by robillionaire » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:55 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
It's all bullsh*t and so is this post. A gigantic circle jerk, like so much on here.

And people wonder why I troll.


You’re just hiding your bad negative nelly opinions behind the veil of sarcasm and trolling but I see right through it, hater!
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 40,343
And1: 58,020
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1039 » by robillionaire » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:55 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:Mods should just mass ban everyone with more than 20,000 posts.
They'd all be guilty of something.
Clean this place right up.


That’s a little overkill, personally I’d ban everyone with over 37,600 posts
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,506
And1: 27,208
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1040 » by Jalen Bluntson » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:56 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:Mods should just mass ban everyone with more than 20,000 posts.
They'd all be guilty of something.
Clean this place right up.


I did my time already! I'm not going back!!!!!
:beer: RIP mags

Return to New York Knicks