ImageImageImageImageImage

Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.

Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

DKB333
Pro Prospect
Posts: 794
And1: 453
Joined: Jul 25, 2024
   

Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#1 » by DKB333 » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:08 pm

Poeltl is having a career year but having said that the Raptors are obviously in a complete rebuild. As of now the Raptors could have had Leonard Miller/Whatever prospect that they wanted that did not go top 5 in this years draft, as well as this years 2025 2nd round pick. Is the stability that Poeltl provides worth giving up those assets as of today?
User avatar
HumbleRen
RealGM
Posts: 18,388
And1: 25,370
Joined: Jul 02, 2021
 

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#2 » by HumbleRen » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:13 pm

What stability :lol:

He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.

For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.
TheGeneral99
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,513
And1: 5,922
Joined: Mar 11, 2023
   

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#3 » by TheGeneral99 » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:15 pm

He's on a very good contract and will have good trade value if things don't go well next season.
User avatar
TorontoBarneys
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 7,038
Joined: Dec 30, 2022
   

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#4 » by TorontoBarneys » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:18 pm

We suck gonads with him. It shouldn't be too hard to find a league average C after him. He's not that big of a deal on this roster, guys.

If you can get a decent 1st in this or the next draft for him, you pull the trigger IMO.
DKB333
Pro Prospect
Posts: 794
And1: 453
Joined: Jul 25, 2024
   

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#5 » by DKB333 » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:19 pm

HumbleRen wrote:What stability :lol:

He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.

For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.


You can't have an entire roster full of 1st and 2nd year players though. He is the only vet on the team that can play and is still yet to hit 30. There is a chance that none of the players the Spurs get out of the deal end up being as good as Yak is.
brownbobcat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,814
And1: 3,773
Joined: Jun 09, 2006

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#6 » by brownbobcat » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:23 pm

DKB333 wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:What stability :lol:

He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.

For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.


You can't have an entire roster full of 1st and 2nd year players though. He is the only vet on the team that can play and is still yet to hit 30. There is a chance that none of the players the Spurs get out of the deal end up being as good as Yak is.

Good thing they have him or else they'd suck.

Unforgiveable arrogance not to tank for Wemby. I don't care if the odds were only 5-9%, he's going to rule the league for the next 15 years.
anotherhomer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,878
And1: 3,483
Joined: Jun 23, 2008

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#7 » by anotherhomer » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:32 pm

brownbobcat wrote:
DKB333 wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:What stability :lol:

He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.

For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.


You can't have an entire roster full of 1st and 2nd year players though. He is the only vet on the team that can play and is still yet to hit 30. There is a chance that none of the players the Spurs get out of the deal end up being as good as Yak is.

Good thing they have him or else they'd suck.

Unforgiveable arrogance not to tank for Wemby. I don't care if the odds were only 5-9%, he's going to rule the league for the next 15 years.


Missing out on either wemby, brandon miller, amen thompson, Bilal c., Derrick lively, cason wallace will always stink
User avatar
TorontoBarneys
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 7,038
Joined: Dec 30, 2022
   

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#8 » by TorontoBarneys » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:32 pm

DKB333 wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:What stability :lol:

He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.

For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.


You can't have an entire roster full of 1st and 2nd year players though. He is the only vet on the team that can play and is still yet to hit 30. There is a chance that none of the players the Spurs get out of the deal end up being as good as Yak is.


You know you can just sign vets in the offseason, right?
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 32,022
And1: 46,714
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#9 » by Tor_Raps » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:34 pm

HumbleRen wrote:What stability :lol:

He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.

For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.


Came here to say exactly this, not to mention how we lost Fred and other assets for less than their desirable package.

The OG trade has the one brightside major transaction Masai has accomplished since the championship.
AbC?
Head Coach
Posts: 6,624
And1: 10,645
Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#10 » by AbC? » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:38 pm

The Poeltl trade and its downstream impact has been a disaster.
Image
User avatar
CazOnReal
Starter
Posts: 2,025
And1: 1,589
Joined: Jan 13, 2024
 

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#11 » by CazOnReal » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:39 pm

Fair value but horrendous timing

I still maintain the Thad Young trade was worse since we could have gotten Walker Kessler with the 1st we gave up to dump Dragic and thus we:
1. Would be in a better spot for the rebuild
2. Would have never done the Poeltl trade
3. Would be more likely to blow it up in 2023 instead of buying/staying put at that year's deadline when they have 2 young players who can contribute right away
DKB333
Pro Prospect
Posts: 794
And1: 453
Joined: Jul 25, 2024
   

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#12 » by DKB333 » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:42 pm

brownbobcat wrote:
DKB333 wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:What stability :lol:

He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.

For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.


You can't have an entire roster full of 1st and 2nd year players though. He is the only vet on the team that can play and is still yet to hit 30. There is a chance that none of the players the Spurs get out of the deal end up being as good as Yak is.

Good thing they have him or else they'd suck.

Unforgiveable arrogance not to tank for Wemby. I don't care if the odds were only 5-9%, he's going to rule the league for the next 15 years.


Te NBA was not going to let Wemby end up in Toronto. They wanted him as a Spur to be Tim Duncan 2.0. The NBA is also not going to allow Flagg to be in Toronto either.
User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 66,217
And1: 60,991
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#13 » by Raps in 4 » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:44 pm

The trade is still a massive L. We traded the #8 pick and 2x SRPs for a role player.

Whoever we drafted at #8 would have been an actual piece to grow with the core. Yak will be gone in a year, and even if we overpay to keep him, he's going to be on the decline once our core reaches its prime.
Dalek
RealGM
Posts: 13,877
And1: 10,676
Joined: Jan 24, 2005
Location: At the elbow - dropping dimes
 

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#14 » by Dalek » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:47 pm

DKB333 wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:What stability :lol:

He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.

For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.


You can't have an entire roster full of 1st and 2nd year players though. He is the only vet on the team that can play and is still yet to hit 30. There is a chance that none of the players the Spurs get out of the deal end up being as good as Yak is.


I think best outcome with Poeltl is a middling play-in team. We have seen him get bullied by Towns, Jokic, or even Zubac or stretched out by Vucevic and Wemby. He is a bit soft and depends on his athleticism to cover guards on drives and can't shoot outside ten feet. He is miles better than any current option on the team, but that doesn't mean we build around him. No contending team would start him, and using him on a lottery team isn't going to raise the floor.

His contract is good and value at his highest, and if we get some of what we lost it would be good. Remember, since we traded for him we have not become an elite defensive team or adequate offensive team - we have lost a lot of games.

Masai/Bobby just have to admit we lost the trade with SA. It is just time to recoup our losses into a future asset that may or may not pan out. The other bonus is getting rid of his future salary to take on bad contract(s) and more picks. We need to create some flexibility and better draft assets.
User avatar
ForeverTFC
RealGM
Posts: 17,969
And1: 19,592
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
         

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#15 » by ForeverTFC » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:49 pm

If they knew they weren't going to pay what it takes to keep FVV, they should have never made the trade. Even the FO admitted as such. Not sure why we need to rehash it.

Regardless, he's a legitimate starting C, on a good contract and they should move him to get assets. This team is too far away.
C_Money
RealGM
Posts: 26,457
And1: 26,693
Joined: Jun 30, 2008
       

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#16 » by C_Money » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:50 pm

TorontoBarneys wrote:We suck gonads with him. It shouldn't be too hard to find a league average C after him. He's not that big of a deal on this roster, guys.

If you can get a decent 1st in this or the next draft for him, you pull the trigger IMO.


This. His impact looks bigger than it is because his backup is Kelly f**king Olynyk.
Image
User avatar
TorontoBarneys
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 7,038
Joined: Dec 30, 2022
   

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#17 » by TorontoBarneys » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:54 pm

C_Money wrote:
TorontoBarneys wrote:We suck gonads with him. It shouldn't be too hard to find a league average C after him. He's not that big of a deal on this roster, guys.

If you can get a decent 1st in this or the next draft for him, you pull the trigger IMO.


This. His impact looks bigger than it is because his backup is Kelly f**king Olynyk.


Kelly isn't even a C. So effectively, Poeltl has no back-up. Koloko would have been it, but, you know...
User avatar
artsncrafts
RealGM
Posts: 22,357
And1: 26,034
Joined: Feb 04, 2013
Location: Shambleland, Ont.
 

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#18 » by artsncrafts » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:56 pm

Didnt Masai already admit the trade was a mistake?
Harold_and_Kumar wrote:What if the 10 incher was overrated and the 4 incher was too small for any playing time, but the 7 incher was a perfect fit for our roster and the 5 incher was good for specific situations, like backdoor cuts?
DG88
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 39,148
And1: 29,950
Joined: Jul 26, 2008
Location: You don't know my location but I know yours
     

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#19 » by DG88 » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:57 pm

Jakob is a good C I think we can all agree. The issue was that the timing of trade for a team that wasn't competitive, and only exasperated our spacing issues. Not to mention giving away 3 picks that we could have had for our rebuild.

It's one thing if we're like OKC and needed that big man to solidify our starting lineup to take us to another level, but we're not and the FO fumbled that one.
Image
Spida888
Starter
Posts: 2,318
And1: 1,849
Joined: Mar 05, 2021
 

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now. 

Post#20 » by Spida888 » Thu Jan 9, 2025 11:59 pm

CazOnReal wrote:Fair value but horrendous timing

I still maintain the Thad Young trade was worse since we could have gotten Walker Kessler with the 1st we gave up to dump Dragic and thus we:
1. Would be in a better spot for the rebuild
2. Would have never done the Poeltl trade
3. Would be more likely to blow it up in 2023 instead of buying/staying put at that year's deadline when they have 2 young players who can contribute right away

The Thad trade was pretty bad too, but the Poeltl trade still takes the cake for me as one of the worst Masai trades.

We were 6th from the bottom iirc and it was a draft where we can possibly acquire a generational talent in Wemby. Some say it went to the Spurs because they were 3rd and we were never going to be that bad, but one can only say that in hindsight. Nobody knew at the time who was going to win the lottery. We should have continued tanking that season and secured the best odds to win the lottery.

The low pick protections for the Poeltl trade is still baffling today.

Return to Toronto Raptors