Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 794
- And1: 453
- Joined: Jul 25, 2024
-
Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
Poeltl is having a career year but having said that the Raptors are obviously in a complete rebuild. As of now the Raptors could have had Leonard Miller/Whatever prospect that they wanted that did not go top 5 in this years draft, as well as this years 2025 2nd round pick. Is the stability that Poeltl provides worth giving up those assets as of today?
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
- HumbleRen
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,388
- And1: 25,370
- Joined: Jul 02, 2021
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
What stability
He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.
For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.

He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.
For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,513
- And1: 5,924
- Joined: Mar 11, 2023
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
He's on a very good contract and will have good trade value if things don't go well next season.
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
- TorontoBarneys
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,898
- And1: 7,038
- Joined: Dec 30, 2022
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
We suck gonads with him. It shouldn't be too hard to find a league average C after him. He's not that big of a deal on this roster, guys.
If you can get a decent 1st in this or the next draft for him, you pull the trigger IMO.
If you can get a decent 1st in this or the next draft for him, you pull the trigger IMO.
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 794
- And1: 453
- Joined: Jul 25, 2024
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
HumbleRen wrote:What stability![]()
He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.
For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.
You can't have an entire roster full of 1st and 2nd year players though. He is the only vet on the team that can play and is still yet to hit 30. There is a chance that none of the players the Spurs get out of the deal end up being as good as Yak is.
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,814
- And1: 3,773
- Joined: Jun 09, 2006
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
DKB333 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:What stability![]()
He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.
For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.
You can't have an entire roster full of 1st and 2nd year players though. He is the only vet on the team that can play and is still yet to hit 30. There is a chance that none of the players the Spurs get out of the deal end up being as good as Yak is.
Good thing they have him or else they'd suck.
Unforgiveable arrogance not to tank for Wemby. I don't care if the odds were only 5-9%, he's going to rule the league for the next 15 years.
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,878
- And1: 3,483
- Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
brownbobcat wrote:DKB333 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:What stability![]()
He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.
For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.
You can't have an entire roster full of 1st and 2nd year players though. He is the only vet on the team that can play and is still yet to hit 30. There is a chance that none of the players the Spurs get out of the deal end up being as good as Yak is.
Good thing they have him or else they'd suck.
Unforgiveable arrogance not to tank for Wemby. I don't care if the odds were only 5-9%, he's going to rule the league for the next 15 years.
Missing out on either wemby, brandon miller, amen thompson, Bilal c., Derrick lively, cason wallace will always stink
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
- TorontoBarneys
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,898
- And1: 7,038
- Joined: Dec 30, 2022
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
DKB333 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:What stability![]()
He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.
For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.
You can't have an entire roster full of 1st and 2nd year players though. He is the only vet on the team that can play and is still yet to hit 30. There is a chance that none of the players the Spurs get out of the deal end up being as good as Yak is.
You know you can just sign vets in the offseason, right?
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,022
- And1: 46,714
- Joined: Oct 14, 2018
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
HumbleRen wrote:What stability![]()
He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.
For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.
Came here to say exactly this, not to mention how we lost Fred and other assets for less than their desirable package.
The OG trade has the one brightside major transaction Masai has accomplished since the championship.
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,624
- And1: 10,645
- Joined: Feb 02, 2005
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
The Poeltl trade and its downstream impact has been a disaster.

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
- CazOnReal
- Starter
- Posts: 2,025
- And1: 1,589
- Joined: Jan 13, 2024
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
Fair value but horrendous timing
I still maintain the Thad Young trade was worse since we could have gotten Walker Kessler with the 1st we gave up to dump Dragic and thus we:
1. Would be in a better spot for the rebuild
2. Would have never done the Poeltl trade
3. Would be more likely to blow it up in 2023 instead of buying/staying put at that year's deadline when they have 2 young players who can contribute right away
I still maintain the Thad Young trade was worse since we could have gotten Walker Kessler with the 1st we gave up to dump Dragic and thus we:
1. Would be in a better spot for the rebuild
2. Would have never done the Poeltl trade
3. Would be more likely to blow it up in 2023 instead of buying/staying put at that year's deadline when they have 2 young players who can contribute right away
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 794
- And1: 453
- Joined: Jul 25, 2024
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
brownbobcat wrote:DKB333 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:What stability![]()
He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.
For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.
You can't have an entire roster full of 1st and 2nd year players though. He is the only vet on the team that can play and is still yet to hit 30. There is a chance that none of the players the Spurs get out of the deal end up being as good as Yak is.
Good thing they have him or else they'd suck.
Unforgiveable arrogance not to tank for Wemby. I don't care if the odds were only 5-9%, he's going to rule the league for the next 15 years.
Te NBA was not going to let Wemby end up in Toronto. They wanted him as a Spur to be Tim Duncan 2.0. The NBA is also not going to allow Flagg to be in Toronto either.
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
- Raps in 4
- RealGM
- Posts: 66,222
- And1: 61,002
- Joined: Nov 01, 2008
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
The trade is still a massive L. We traded the #8 pick and 2x SRPs for a role player.
Whoever we drafted at #8 would have been an actual piece to grow with the core. Yak will be gone in a year, and even if we overpay to keep him, he's going to be on the decline once our core reaches its prime.
Whoever we drafted at #8 would have been an actual piece to grow with the core. Yak will be gone in a year, and even if we overpay to keep him, he's going to be on the decline once our core reaches its prime.
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,877
- And1: 10,676
- Joined: Jan 24, 2005
- Location: At the elbow - dropping dimes
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
DKB333 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:What stability![]()
He’s been a fine player for us, more than worth his contract but that was never really the issue. It’s more so the cascading effect it had on 2 draft cycles that we should have been using to add real lotto talent to our roster beside Scottie.
For that alone, that trade will always be a L no matter how well Poeltl plays unfortunately.
You can't have an entire roster full of 1st and 2nd year players though. He is the only vet on the team that can play and is still yet to hit 30. There is a chance that none of the players the Spurs get out of the deal end up being as good as Yak is.
I think best outcome with Poeltl is a middling play-in team. We have seen him get bullied by Towns, Jokic, or even Zubac or stretched out by Vucevic and Wemby. He is a bit soft and depends on his athleticism to cover guards on drives and can't shoot outside ten feet. He is miles better than any current option on the team, but that doesn't mean we build around him. No contending team would start him, and using him on a lottery team isn't going to raise the floor.
His contract is good and value at his highest, and if we get some of what we lost it would be good. Remember, since we traded for him we have not become an elite defensive team or adequate offensive team - we have lost a lot of games.
Masai/Bobby just have to admit we lost the trade with SA. It is just time to recoup our losses into a future asset that may or may not pan out. The other bonus is getting rid of his future salary to take on bad contract(s) and more picks. We need to create some flexibility and better draft assets.
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
- ForeverTFC
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,969
- And1: 19,592
- Joined: Dec 07, 2004
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
If they knew they weren't going to pay what it takes to keep FVV, they should have never made the trade. Even the FO admitted as such. Not sure why we need to rehash it.
Regardless, he's a legitimate starting C, on a good contract and they should move him to get assets. This team is too far away.
Regardless, he's a legitimate starting C, on a good contract and they should move him to get assets. This team is too far away.
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,458
- And1: 26,693
- Joined: Jun 30, 2008
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
TorontoBarneys wrote:We suck gonads with him. It shouldn't be too hard to find a league average C after him. He's not that big of a deal on this roster, guys.
If you can get a decent 1st in this or the next draft for him, you pull the trigger IMO.
This. His impact looks bigger than it is because his backup is Kelly f**king Olynyk.

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
- TorontoBarneys
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,898
- And1: 7,038
- Joined: Dec 30, 2022
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
C_Money wrote:TorontoBarneys wrote:We suck gonads with him. It shouldn't be too hard to find a league average C after him. He's not that big of a deal on this roster, guys.
If you can get a decent 1st in this or the next draft for him, you pull the trigger IMO.
This. His impact looks bigger than it is because his backup is Kelly f**king Olynyk.
Kelly isn't even a C. So effectively, Poeltl has no back-up. Koloko would have been it, but, you know...
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
- artsncrafts
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,357
- And1: 26,034
- Joined: Feb 04, 2013
- Location: Shambleland, Ont.
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
Didnt Masai already admit the trade was a mistake?
Harold_and_Kumar wrote:What if the 10 incher was overrated and the 4 incher was too small for any playing time, but the 7 incher was a perfect fit for our roster and the 5 incher was good for specific situations, like backdoor cuts?
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
-
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 39,148
- And1: 29,950
- Joined: Jul 26, 2008
- Location: You don't know my location but I know yours
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
Jakob is a good C I think we can all agree. The issue was that the timing of trade for a team that wasn't competitive, and only exasperated our spacing issues. Not to mention giving away 3 picks that we could have had for our rebuild.
It's one thing if we're like OKC and needed that big man to solidify our starting lineup to take us to another level, but we're not and the FO fumbled that one.
It's one thing if we're like OKC and needed that big man to solidify our starting lineup to take us to another level, but we're not and the FO fumbled that one.

Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,318
- And1: 1,849
- Joined: Mar 05, 2021
-
Re: Revisiting the Jakob Poeltl trade as it stands now.
CazOnReal wrote:Fair value but horrendous timing
I still maintain the Thad Young trade was worse since we could have gotten Walker Kessler with the 1st we gave up to dump Dragic and thus we:
1. Would be in a better spot for the rebuild
2. Would have never done the Poeltl trade
3. Would be more likely to blow it up in 2023 instead of buying/staying put at that year's deadline when they have 2 young players who can contribute right away
The Thad trade was pretty bad too, but the Poeltl trade still takes the cake for me as one of the worst Masai trades.
We were 6th from the bottom iirc and it was a draft where we can possibly acquire a generational talent in Wemby. Some say it went to the Spurs because they were 3rd and we were never going to be that bad, but one can only say that in hindsight. Nobody knew at the time who was going to win the lottery. We should have continued tanking that season and secured the best odds to win the lottery.
The low pick protections for the Poeltl trade is still baffling today.