FarBeyondDriven wrote:clyde21 wrote:let's be more specific, Edgecombe is actually playing well, he's just not shooting well, which I know in the modern NBA every conversation about a player devolves into this "can he shoot" garbage which is why being i'm being turned off by this league more and more every year.
re: Edgecombe, dude has been a monster defensively, over 5 steals and 2 blocks per 100 possessions, almost 11 BPM, +25 Net Rating, and actually has a pretty respectable 6.6 assists per 100 for what's supposed to be an off-ball court runner.
this is pretty clearly a good class. much *much* better than last years with better archetypes and better athletes and better players overall. so ranking Cooper #2 by default despite only capping him as a role player doesn't pass the smell test, sorry.
such nonsense. lol what does this even mean? Please enlighten us what constitutes archetype in your mind and who in 2025 fits and who in 2024 doesn't.
2024 has every archetype you can imagine. Shot blocking bigs, stretch bigs, athletic 3 and D wings, shooters, scorers, combo guards, lead guards.
I know you didn't think McCain was potentially a lead guard but when he started he put up 24/3/4 (39% from three) and proved he was before going down with injury. That's Maxey production, who most consider a lead guard. Do you expect much better from Harper as a rookie? Let me guess, you won't admit McCain fits in the lead guard archetype still. McCain is just one of many examples of you people being wrong about the 2024 class. I wish we could fast forward a few years because it's going to be fun calling everyone out on here.
>someone, somewhere in the world says something less than flattering about the 2024 draft class
FarBeyondDriven on RealGM:
