Gravy wrote:JayTWill wrote:Gravy wrote:Every time we say the team is out of options they bring someone in we never thought they could. So I'll wait and see if they can do it again.
If you think the kids have some high potential that will never be developed here all I can say is that has not been proven true yet under Thibs. IQ, RJ, Deuce have developed to their potential here. But like Sham said you may keep hoping these new guys turn into great players too. with a brand new coach that will save them
I'm not saying the kids have high potential but guys like Shamet, Payne, Precious and Sims aren't exactly a high bar to clear imo. You want to keep Thibs and continue what we are doing but you say we need better players? Ok. Give me an example of a better player that would take the Knicks to true contender status with Thibs as a coach and tell me how the Knicks will acquire that player.
I dont even know how we got the players we have now lol. Thats why I dont do trades and transactions. If you believe Atkinson or anyone except Thibs would have us with the same record as the Cavs, ok, I cant really prove or disprove that. I've noticed in the last 20 years of Knicksdom we always blame the coach first then years later after he's fired we realize the players he had were actually not that good. Happens every time
So you continue to shoot down the idea of a coaching change possibly improving the team but you can't think of a single trade idea to possibly improve the team? You might be the Tom Thibodeau of posters with your lack of imagination and stubbornness. Just kidding....
It's not about simply blaming the coach. I was one of the few people that has been critical of the moves they have made after the OG trade. I was not a fan of the team they had built and the way they had managed their assets but none of that can be changed now. They can't bring Grimes and those second round picks back. They can't bring those 5 1sts, a swap, and high 2nd back. They can't stop iHart from walking. They can't bring DDV back. I don't want them to bring Randle back.
They have limited trade assets to make a significant improvement to the roster. They have limited room for internal growth outside of the rookies. More vet min additions are unlikely to make a bigger impact than the guys currently on the bench. So where else can I look to possibly improve the team?
How can you watch OKC manhandle the Knicks with young depth and not think investing time in developing the youth on the court could be beneficial?
How could you watch OKC switch, trap, blitz, double-team, play zone etc with a historically great defense while the other coach has been running the same defense forever no matter the personnel and not think there could be some possible improvements to the coach's defensive strategy?
How could you watch Brunson pound the air out of the ball year after year no matter how much talent he has around him while the team plays near the slowest pace in the league once again and not think there could possibly be some improvement in the coach's offensive strategy?