Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad'

Moderators: Domejandro, bwgood77

RealGM Wiretap
RealGM
Posts: 112,897
And1: 310
Joined: Mar 19, 2013

Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#1 » by RealGM Wiretap » Sun Jan 12, 2025 7:23 pm

It's not a secret that Jimmy Butler would like to be traded to the Phoenix Suns. That desire seems to be mutual from the Suns side as well.


One league source was quoted by The Stein Line as saying about Phoenix and Butler that "they want him bad".


The major obstacle in a Butler to Phoenix trade remains finding a team willing to take on Bradley Beal, as well as Beal approving a trade to that team. Beal said last week that if the Suns want to trade him, that he will need to be "addressed" about that option. Beal's agent Mark Bartelstein also said that his client might be willing to allow a trade to be pushed through but would never fully waive his no-trade clause in a deal.


The no-trade clause is one challenge in putting together a deal for Beal. The others are that the veteran guard is regularly injured. And Beal is owed $50.2 million this season and $110.8 million over the next two seasons beyond this one.

Via Marc Stein/The Stein Line

akula1488
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,473
And1: 524
Joined: Nov 12, 2006

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#2 » by akula1488 » Sun Jan 12, 2025 8:11 pm

more like they want to get rid of Beal 'Bad'
Bentley1225
RealGM
Posts: 13,601
And1: 1,636
Joined: Jan 10, 2007

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#3 » by Bentley1225 » Sun Jan 12, 2025 8:35 pm

If the Suns want Butler, they’re going to have to deal a 1st as they lose leverage with Beal NTC.
alienpick
Starter
Posts: 2,212
And1: 633
Joined: Apr 10, 2013
 

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#4 » by alienpick » Sun Jan 12, 2025 8:37 pm

ain't happening. this is why you should have never traded for Beal in the first place
Pickled Prunes
General Manager
Posts: 8,602
And1: 1,370
Joined: Sep 14, 2010

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#5 » by Pickled Prunes » Sun Jan 12, 2025 9:58 pm

alienpick wrote:ain't happening. this is why you should have never traded for Beal in the first place

True, they should not have traded for Beal. But I would not be surprised if it doesn't get done. I don't think Beal wants to be perceived as the reason PHX didn't get a title or be the most hated player on the court in home games. I don't think Beal is the problem and I don't think Jimmy is the solution, but if he blocks a trade the fans will put everything on him!

There is nothing in PHX that should make Beal want to stay. Right now he's coming off the bench for a losing team. Even a trade to DET is an upgrade in fit, role and playoff hopes.
xchange55
Senior
Posts: 724
And1: 642
Joined: May 25, 2016
         

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#6 » by xchange55 » Mon Jan 13, 2025 3:00 am

The last year of Beal's contract is a player option. I could see a possibility where he agrees to go to bad team and try to put up big numbers next season (at $53m). Then he can opt out of the player option (at $57m) the following year in his age 33 season to sign a long term deal.

Let's say he plays out the contract in PHX including the player option - no matter how well he plays, his stats will be watered down due to Durant and Book. And much tougher then to justify a sizeable next contract while also a year older.
Roy T
Rookie
Posts: 1,199
And1: 1,002
Joined: Jan 30, 2022
 

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#7 » by Roy T » Mon Jan 13, 2025 4:28 am

Everybody knew trading for Beal was bad. He will play out his contract and retire. No way he opts out of 57 mil at the age of 35. The guy is done anyways.
User avatar
eureca20
Junior
Posts: 450
And1: 86
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#8 » by eureca20 » Mon Jan 13, 2025 6:36 am

Roy T wrote:Everybody knew trading for Beal was bad. He will play out his contract and retire. No way he opts out of 57 mil at the age of 35. The guy is done anyways.


Done? That is definitely a stretch. People acting like he is way worse than he is. He is still a good player. Just overpaid.

He would be 33 when he could opt out. I agree that he likely does not opt out. Which would mean he would be 34 when he hits free agency in 2027. My guess is he is still good at 34. Just gets paid way less.
User avatar
NoStatsGuy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,898
And1: 2,131
Joined: Feb 14, 2010
Location: Germany
 

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#9 » by NoStatsGuy » Mon Jan 13, 2025 10:23 am

yea beal doesnt seem like the kind of guy that would help the suns getting a deal done. that ntc was one of the worst businessmoves in the history of the nba. and beal also uses it in a way, that i believe team will never give out ntcs again. he literally held multiple teams hostage with that contract and will do with another one IF he gets traded, which i highly doubt.
im bout dat action boss
objectivefan
Junior
Posts: 452
And1: 71
Joined: Oct 30, 2019
     

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#10 » by objectivefan » Mon Jan 13, 2025 12:50 pm

xchange55 wrote:The last year of Beal's contract is a player option. I could see a possibility where he agrees to go to bad team and try to put up big numbers next season (at $53m). Then he can opt out of the player option (at $57m) the following year in his age 33 season to sign a long term deal.

Let's say he plays out the contract in PHX including the player option - no matter how well he plays, his stats will be watered down due to Durant and Book. And much tougher then to justify a sizeable next contract while also a year older.


There are no scenarios where Beal turns down the $57 million player option.

Given his age and injury history, he is a veteran role-player shooter off the bench. His Market is 2 years/$38 million to Denver or Minnesota
TheCage4
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,337
And1: 604
Joined: Aug 22, 2001
Location: NY
       

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#11 » by TheCage4 » Mon Jan 13, 2025 1:20 pm

A deal with Minnesota revolving around Randle makes the most financial sense for Miami; but the ownership questions with the Wolves, Beal's NTC, and what else Riley would want in return are all significant obstacles.
“And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission.” -V
User avatar
Furinkazan
General Manager
Posts: 7,941
And1: 3,600
Joined: May 11, 2005
     

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#12 » by Furinkazan » Mon Jan 13, 2025 1:49 pm

l-ove how this super inteligent NBA gms think theres always someone stupid enough to bail them out
even an average armchair gm Joe knew how this is going to end up but no...lets do it life has no meaning theres no consequences :D
MitchB3
Veteran
Posts: 2,622
And1: 166
Joined: Jul 04, 2014
 

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#13 » by MitchB3 » Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:04 pm

TheCage4 wrote:A deal with Minnesota revolving around Randle makes the most financial sense for Miami; but the ownership questions with the Wolves, Beal's NTC, and what else Riley would want in return are all significant obstacles.



The Heat doesn't want to take back cap space that might impact 2026. They (Heat) don't want Beal. The Suns are breaking the cardinal rule of trading, which is de-valuing Beal when they should be increasing him. Moving him to the bench means that they view him as a 6th man, and I don't know about you but paying $50 Million, to a 6th man is nasty work.
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 50,339
And1: 32,960
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#14 » by og15 » Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:23 pm

Furinkazan wrote:l-ove how this super inteligent NBA gms think theres always someone stupid enough to bail them out
even an average armchair gm Joe knew how this is going to end up but no...lets do it life has no meaning theres no consequences :D

Sometimes (not all) there's also the owner influence in some of the moves, and as a GM, you gotta do what you gotta do.
akula1488
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,473
And1: 524
Joined: Nov 12, 2006

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#15 » by akula1488 » Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:41 pm

Randle, Beal, Ingram, Lavine and Jimmy. A 5 team trade where Randle in Miami, Beal in Minnesota, Jimmy in Phoenix, Lavine in New Orleans and Ingram in Chicago make some sense
puja21
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,697
And1: 281
Joined: Feb 08, 2013

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#16 » by puja21 » Mon Jan 13, 2025 3:15 pm

alienpick wrote:ain't happening. this is why you should have never traded for Beal in the first place


there's always another willing GM

e.g. Billy King taking on KG/Pierce/Terry for the picks that became Jaylen Brown and Jayson Tatum

In a similar vein, I participated -- right here in RealGM in the days leading up to those trades -- in discussions where people wrote these ironclad guarantees:

Feb 2017, hours before the trade: "Pelicans have no chance of getting Boogie cousins. They have nothing to offer."

Sep 2022, again hours before the [Cavs] trade -- these 7 knicks fans were positive Ainge was *lying* about having other suitors for Donovan Mitchell: https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=101078116#p101078116

There is ALWAYS another desperate GM willing to do something that sounds irrational/crazy.
alienpick
Starter
Posts: 2,212
And1: 633
Joined: Apr 10, 2013
 

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#17 » by alienpick » Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:50 pm

puja21 wrote:
alienpick wrote:ain't happening. this is why you should have never traded for Beal in the first place


there's always another willing GM

e.g. Billy King taking on KG/Pierce/Terry for the picks that became Jaylen Brown and Jayson Tatum

In a similar vein, I participated -- right here in RealGM in the days leading up to those trades -- in discussions where people wrote these ironclad guarantees:

Feb 2017, hours before the trade: "Pelicans have no chance of getting Boogie cousins. They have nothing to offer."

Sep 2022, again hours before the [Cavs] trade -- these 7 knicks fans were positive Ainge was *lying* about having other suitors for Donovan Mitchell: https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=101078116#p101078116

There is ALWAYS another desperate GM willing to do something that sounds irrational/crazy.


True, and it sounds closer to happening but is Pat Riley gullible enough?
puja21
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,697
And1: 281
Joined: Feb 08, 2013

Re: Suns Want Jimmy Butler 'Bad' 

Post#18 » by puja21 » Thu Jan 23, 2025 2:58 pm

alienpick wrote:
puja21 wrote:
alienpick wrote:ain't happening. this is why you should have never traded for Beal in the first place


there's always another willing GM

e.g. Billy King taking on KG/Pierce/Terry for the picks that became Jaylen Brown and Jayson Tatum

In a similar vein, I participated -- right here in RealGM in the days leading up to those trades -- in discussions where people wrote these ironclad guarantees:

Feb 2017, hours before the trade: "Pelicans have no chance of getting Boogie cousins. They have nothing to offer."

Sep 2022, again hours before the [Cavs] trade -- these 7 knicks fans were positive Ainge was *lying* about having other suitors for Donovan Mitchell: https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=101078116#p101078116

There is ALWAYS another desperate GM willing to do something that sounds irrational/crazy.


True, and it sounds closer to happening but is Pat Riley gullible enough?


I don't think Beal goes to Miami, no -- hard to imagine Miami locking into 110M for another small guard who doesn't defend AND has a NTC

If it happens, probably ends up being a 3, 4 or 5 team trade.

Some possibilities floated on NBA pods/twitter:

Beal goes to Chicago to reunite w/ his Gators' coach
^This assumes Chicago is still willing to move LaVine (let alone take on Beal)

Beal goes to Milwaukee
^This one assumes either:
Bucks are willing to dump Brook Lopez to a 4th team like Houston...
OR
Heat are willing to take reduced salary as the reward to be free of Butle; Middleton + Conaughton cost 40M in 2024 and just 21M (player options) in 2025.

There are some Beal to Philly scenarios too, but PG13 also playing terribly and on a long max deal

There are also some options where Detroit is the 4th team

Bottomline is that Beal and Butler are both negative assets at this point so anyone else getting involved is only adding to the poo poo platter. There's no magic bullet. At least one team is going to be grasping at hope and facing criticism after any deal (and probably ALL of them are)

Return to Wiretap Discussion