TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
I think we found our answer to egos and agendas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
F*ck off with the Brunson hate.
Maybe it's just bad coaching.
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
I think we found our answer to egos and agendas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Everybody sees it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As long as jhart Brunson and Kat are not involved Get it doneee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Exactly, they overreact to the post/paint regardless of who the player is, you do not leave a shooter to double on Tobias in the post. The Tom glazers don't believe scheme matters but he broke everything down.
kNicksGmen wrote:i must be watching a different game. does anyone have the stats on how many assisted baskets Kat has made from a brunson pass? feels like he always misses him when he's open for 3 and when he rolls it's more just to collapse the defense for brunson to do his thing or pass to someone else for 3.thebuzzardman wrote:The KnicksFix wrote:
The Knicks are good enough to win a chip. Adding Mitch will help a ton, if they can add another chipper on the bench with Payne and deuce, they’ll be cookin. The problem is the coach. As long as we dont lose him, we wont go anywhere.
Actually, Brunson gets the ball to KAT plenty and the run a good pick and roll.
the bottom line is brunson's vision and playmaking is mediocre at best. he has gotten better but to me is still essentially an undersized scoring guard that is capable of organizing the team well enough but isn't a plus advantage creator (other than for himself to score)
edit I just checked and KAT has been assisted 69 times by brunson, 2nd most is hart with 57. i think that is telling since hart is rarely even handling the ball. Cam has 27 in probably a tenth of the minutes.

Guano wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:ORTG/DRTG by quarter
1st - 115.9 / 112.9 (10th)
2nd - 123.3 / 109.4 (9th)
3rd - 123.6 / 110.6 (10th)
4th - 114.4 / 117.2 (25th)
The offense crashes just as hard in the 4th as the defense does.
You're arguing against flat earthers, homie.
MrDollarBills wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Everybody sees it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As long as jhart Brunson and Kat are not involved Get it doneee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why would you want Zion?
mpharris36 wrote:all starters basically at 40 mins on a b2b
KAT probably hurt
terrible defense....thibs is a **** joke
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Exactly, they overreact to the post/paint regardless of who the player is, you do not leave a shooter to double on Tobias in the post. The Tom glazers don't believe scheme matters but he broke everything down.

thebuzzardman wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
I think we found our answer to egos and agendas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
F*ck off with the Brunson hate.
Maybe it's just bad coaching.
ctorres wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Everybody sees it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As long as jhart Brunson and Kat are not involved Get it doneee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why would you want Zion?
OG and Zion are very close in salary. Zion only makes 67k more
KAT and Zion in the front court would be pretty cool

TheGreenArrow wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
I think we found our answer to egos and agendas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
F*ck off with the Brunson hate.
Maybe it's just bad coaching.
Relax!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I’m not talking about Brunson!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s Og!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He’s the “no ego & agendas” guy Josh is referring too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

thebuzzardman wrote:ctorres wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:
Why would you want Zion?
OG and Zion are very close in salary. Zion only makes 67k more
KAT and Zion in the front court would be pretty cool
For the 10 games a year we'd get to see it.
ctorres wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Everybody sees it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As long as jhart Brunson and Kat are not involved Get it doneee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why would you want Zion?
OG and Zion are very close in salary. Zion only makes 67k more
KAT and Zion in the front court would be pretty cool
TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Unreal lmaooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thebuzzardman wrote:kNicksGmen wrote:i must be watching a different game. does anyone have the stats on how many assisted baskets Kat has made from a brunson pass? feels like he always misses him when he's open for 3 and when he rolls it's more just to collapse the defense for brunson to do his thing or pass to someone else for 3.thebuzzardman wrote:
Actually, Brunson gets the ball to KAT plenty and the run a good pick and roll.
the bottom line is brunson's vision and playmaking is mediocre at best. he has gotten better but to me is still essentially an undersized scoring guard that is capable of organizing the team well enough but isn't a plus advantage creator (other than for himself to score)
edit I just checked and KAT has been assisted 69 times by brunson, 2nd most is hart with 57. i think that is telling since hart is rarely even handling the ball. Cam has 27 in probably a tenth of the minutes.
Sorry if Brunson isn't John Stockton. Maybe a better coach could better utilize the strengths of the team.
MrDollarBills wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Exactly, they overreact to the post/paint regardless of who the player is, you do not leave a shooter to double on Tobias in the post. The Tom glazers don't believe scheme matters but he broke everything down.
Playing defense with a philosophy from 2005 instead of 2025.
I don't understand Tom at all.