Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
JRoy wrote:POR traded Brogdon, a lotto pick, an Unprotected FRP and 2 SRP for Deni.
He’s the best player on our team and on a terrific contract.
Why is POR eating garbage to gift MIL an excellent complementary player?
mlloyd10 wrote:JRoy wrote:POR traded Brogdon, a lotto pick, an Unprotected FRP and 2 SRP for Deni.
He’s the best player on our team and on a terrific contract.
Why is POR eating garbage to gift MIL an excellent complementary player?
Didnt realize they gave up that much...Feels like you guys will be the 2010-2015 bucks...Always going after the 8th seed.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
ShootingtheJ wrote:JRoy wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:
To maximize their tank, they'd need to move Avdija. Get their picks back, and try to capture the Flag.
This deal does not accomplish any of that.
Agree, I earlier proposed a different deal that did.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
crkone wrote:I did a surface deep dive into the Bucks offensive woes. My very obvious conclusion is they should shoot more threes and way, way less mid-rangers. The non existent offensive structure may be a problem.
Fotis St wrote:crkone wrote:I did a surface deep dive into the Bucks offensive woes. My very obvious conclusion is they should shoot more threes and way, way less mid-rangers. The non existent offensive structure may be a problem.
We play the same sets for the last 5 years or so...
ShootingtheJ wrote:Fotis St wrote:crkone wrote:I did a surface deep dive into the Bucks offensive woes. My very obvious conclusion is they should shoot more threes and way, way less mid-rangers. The non existent offensive structure may be a problem.
We play the same sets for the last 5 years or so...
We play a completely different offense now than we did under Bud.
Fotis St wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:Fotis St wrote:We play the same sets for the last 5 years or so...
We play a completely different offense now than we did under Bud.
No its the same ... Pick n roll top.of the key and other 3 cemented on their Bud blue boxes .... No cuts no nothing
mlloyd10 wrote:JRoy wrote:POR traded Brogdon, a lotto pick, an Unprotected FRP and 2 SRP for Deni.
He’s the best player on our team and on a terrific contract.
Why is POR eating garbage to gift MIL an excellent complementary player?
Didnt realize they gave up that much...Feels like you guys will be the 2010-2015 bucks...Always going after the 8th seed.
emunney wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:JRoy wrote:POR traded Brogdon, a lotto pick, an Unprotected FRP and 2 SRP for Deni.
He’s the best player on our team and on a terrific contract.
Why is POR eating garbage to gift MIL an excellent complementary player?
Didnt realize they gave up that much...Feels like you guys will be the 2010-2015 bucks...Always going after the 8th seed.
It was the last pick in the lottery in a bad draft, Brogdon had negative value, and the unprotected 1st is in 2029. Nothing technically false but definitely misleading. Not really different from what you had them getting for him. They wouldn't do it but it's hardly offensive.
Teams with no stars shouldn't be hanging on tight to complementary players. They need something to complement.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
emunney wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:JRoy wrote:POR traded Brogdon, a lotto pick, an Unprotected FRP and 2 SRP for Deni.
He’s the best player on our team and on a terrific contract.
Why is POR eating garbage to gift MIL an excellent complementary player?
Didnt realize they gave up that much...Feels like you guys will be the 2010-2015 bucks...Always going after the 8th seed.
It was the last pick in the lottery in a bad draft, Brogdon had negative value, and the unprotected 1st is in 2029. Nothing technically false but definitely misleading. Not really different from what you had them getting for him. They wouldn't do it but it's hardly offensive.
Teams with no stars shouldn't be hanging on tight to complementary players. They need something to complement.
JRoy wrote:emunney wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:
Didnt realize they gave up that much...Feels like you guys will be the 2010-2015 bucks...Always going after the 8th seed.
It was the last pick in the lottery in a bad draft, Brogdon had negative value, and the unprotected 1st is in 2029. Nothing technically false but definitely misleading. Not really different from what you had them getting for him. They wouldn't do it but it's hardly offensive.
Teams with no stars shouldn't be hanging on tight to complementary players. They need something to complement.
Brogdon was not a bad contract.
Nothing in there is misleading but you do you.
Out.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
Baddy Chuck wrote:
Where do we find odds on the Marjon Beauchamp "sweepstakes" or the Delon Wright "sweepstakes".
crkone wrote:I did a surface deep dive into the Bucks offensive woes. My very obvious conclusion is they should shoot more threes and way, way less mid-rangers. The non existent offensive structure may be a problem.
And while it remains unclear which teams are truly willing to get into the Butler business, two league sources insisted that the Milwaukee Bucks have not, contrary to reports, been told by Butler’s camp that he doesn’t want to play there.
While the Bucks ended Sacramento’s seven-game winning streak on Tuesday night and have won 20 of their last 29 games (including the NBA Cup finale), Giannis Antetokounmpo was sure to highlight their 0-8 record against the top-three teams in the East after Sunday’s one-sided loss to New York. That sort of messaging, one could argue, should compel Milwaukee to keep the option open as the deadline near.