BBallFreak wrote:SA37 wrote:BBallFreak wrote:Pretty sure Minnesota would require picks, too.
Not sure. Minnesota saves some ~$6-7 million in total and ~$4-$5 million next year, Randle is having his worst season in a long, long time -- Collins is arguably having a better season (19-7-4 on 47-33-81 v 18-8-2 on 53-44-86) -- and Randle clearly doesn't fit in Minnesota.
In fairness, this would be trading Randle at the worst time -- and possibly the best time for Collins -- but my feeling is Minnesota would be happy to move on and see if Collins is a better fit, especially since Collins only has a year left on his deal after this year.
I mean, I'd rather Miami keep Collins in this scenario, but I know Riley has wanted Randle in the past.
You may be right but I don't think so. I believe they're owed some compensation as Randle is clearly the superior player, and I'm saying this as an avowed Randle hater.
I think you’re right. If not picks, a useful player in the $6.4 mil salary difference between Randle and Collins.
After what seems like half a decade of people trying to trade John Collins to MIN, these days I don’t mind him as the basis of a trade. He’s having the best season of his life in Utah and maybe that would continue on the Wolves, and he can play a little small-ball five, which the Wolves need. However the “Randle doesn’t fit” argument is disappearing as he learns to play with the team. Finch said from the start Randle would be asked to do a lot of things in MIN that he hadn’t done before. Finch lately is playing him more with the faster second unit (Naz, NAW, used to be DDV), and that’s unlocked him some. MIN definitely needs his passing and playmaking, and of course, he has shown he can be an All NBA player. Twice. And both Randle and Collins have player options to consider.
I’m not trying to be a wet blanket here, and I think spinning Collins through MIN for Randle may have some legs. But I don’t think MIN can do it straight up.