bledredwine wrote:If you’re going to quote several paragraphs and simply write “nonsense”, you should at least back it up with logic instead of a poor empty reply, which is nonsense to begin with. And a one year difference in one of my finals is not a big deal, so come up with some substance. GL and go for it- let’s see what you come up with aside from generalities and unbacked opinion.
Right, because that isn't what you do on a regular basis on this website, right?
But sure, I'll bite.
bledredwine wrote:Exactly. It’s too funny. And if the Heat crushed everyone like they were anticipated to, would we speak of lebron the same way as Durant?
Nope, because those who hate Durant are Lebron fans and they're up set that KD prevented him from GMing more championships and even exposed Lebron in the process. Lebron cheated the system first and Durant followed. That's the blunt truth.
LeBron cheated the system? How? When? Where? All he did was join a team that had the cap space to sign him. Where did he cheat? He didn't even get his way in the end. He wanted Bosh to come to Cleveland. That didn't happen. If anything, LeBron failed on his original goal. Funny thing is, Durant didn't cheat the system either. The truth is, neither of them did. One was just cowardly enough to join the team that beat him and had a historic season, and his two championship wins came against vastly inferior teams. This is a key difference in why his titles will always hold significantly less weight than LeBron's.
bledredwine wrote:There was a desired to prop Lebron on a tier of his own and Durant shut that down.... in the finals at that. Jimmy Butler also showed that you could play on the same level in the finals. Regardless, the GM'ing of super teams is Lebron's specialty and he deserves at least as much hate as Durant gets in that regard.
Durant didn't shut anything down at all. If anything, the opposite happened. People still claimed he wasn't on LeBron's level, he still got no where close to the praise LeBron was getting. Durant himself even said that it bothered him that people weren't claiming he was the top guy in the league, despite having two wins over the guy who held that crown.
And no, LeBron doesn't deserve that level of hate, nor is he ever going to receive that level of hate. People who aren't biased and can read between the lines can see why both are very different situations and why it's silly to compare them. They aren't comparable in the slightest. And not to mention, if it wasn't Miami, it would have been Chicago who won 60 games that season without him, or NY who got Amare. If there's anything he deserved hate for, it was for the stupid way he left.
bledredwine wrote:Speaking of Miami Heatles,
2010 - 58 wins and the finals choke
2011 - 46 wins and finals win
2012 - 66 wins and finals win
2013 - 54 wins and slaughtered in finals
That is a failure, considering the expectations and remarkable amount of talent they assembled. At least Durant was a true ceiling raiser. And as we know, 2012 is nearly another loss (the Allen 3 Bosh rebound)
First off, LeBron is a far bigger ceiling raiser than Durant is and it's not up for discussion. This has got to be one of the worst takes I've ever read during my time on this site, and that says a lot.
Second, two titles in four years, especially when you were only favorites in two of them, isn't a failure by any stretch of the imagination. The fact of the matter is, in the two finals that they did lose, it was against better teams. How is that a failure? No wait let me guess... because LeBron stupidly said "not one, not two...". Oh man, I didn't realize that we now base a run entirely off of what someone says at what was ultimately the equivalent of a high school pep rally. News flash: the LeBron heat weren't unbeatable. They were flawed, they had weaknesses, and the big three of LeBron/Wade/Bosh didn't turn out to be as good as everyone thought. By the time Bosh actually had his role figured out, Wade was already declining due to injury. Circumstances did not play out the way they had intended.
Hell, you mentioned the two losses, let's talk about what those two teams were shall we?
First one: Had little to no depth, major chemistry problems, and had very poor fit. The big three did not understand their roles at all. And worst yet, they had a losing record against .500 teams, and only got to the finals due to injury to other teams and a favorable matchup against the Bulls.
Fourth one: Old team with Wade pretty much a shell of his former self at this point and their depth was far less effective. There's a reason they fell off by 12 wins that season.
In the two seasons where they had actual good depth and didn't have major injury issues, they went on to win a championship. I'm not saying they do as well in the other two seasons if these conditions don't exist, but I will say that if you're going to point these seasons out, it helps to explain why they happened to begin with. Context doesn't care about your feelings.
bledredwine wrote: Realgm was talking about the possibility of the Big 3 going undefeated. That's how cheap it was at the time - no less cheap than Durant joining the 73 win Golden State, which everyone should know wasn't a 73 win team (couldn't even win the chip, Steph was never the same since he became hobbled, Rockets and Durant's OKC almost knocked GS out that year etc).
Bull ****. This is absolute bull **** and you know it.
How the hell is the big three forming no less cheap than Durant joining the 73 win Warriors? How? You tell me right now. Even from a fundamental standpoint of the game, a team that is already formed and has chemistry and is adding a major piece is always going to have a major advantage over the one putting almost an entirely new one together. A lot of people understood this at the time when the comparison was stupidly being thrown around then and they understand it now when it's still for some reason being made. But even then, Miami had to clear up massive amounts of cap space just to make it happen. They had to pretty much scratch most of the roster and fill out the rest of it around the big three with aging role players or just guys no one wants. All Golden State had to do was get rid of Barnes, Bogut and one other player while retaining most of their roster from last season and keeping their three all NBA players, and it all happened only because it was right at the time when the cap spike happened. You tell me how that isn't more cheap than what Miami did.
And yeah, fine, realgm might have talked about that being a possibility. But guess what? By the time the third year rolled around, talks of that were gone. People saw the flaws in going the big three approach at this point, they saw Miami get beaten and they understood why and how it could happen. What they expected isn't what actually happened. The simple fact of the matter is, it doesn't matter how cheap people thought it was at the time, it didn't play out that way, and that's what ultimately matters. We saw how the Durant Warriors played out... they were just as good as we expected them to be, if not more. But unlike the Miami Heat teams who actually went up against Finals teams that were on their level, Golden State never did such a thing, ultimately losing once because, surprise surprise, injuries rekted their chances in 2019. It's funny how that works.
TL;DR: Stop spouting nonsense and actually say something with substance and is based on reality next time.