ImageImageImageImageImage

Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85

spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,632
And1: 5,758
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1361 » by spree2kawhi » Fri Jan 24, 2025 1:29 pm

Who are the western conference all star reserves going to be? Asking for a friend…
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,334
And1: 22,835
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1362 » by RHODEY » Fri Jan 24, 2025 1:51 pm

nykballa2k4 wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Struggling to figure out where to trade Randle. :lol: I have heard this exact conversation many times before. He didn't get 30 games in before this talk started. :lol:


The eternal Randle dilemma... not good enough to get a solid #2 Allstar option in return, but too good to dump for just roleplayers. A perpetual lose lose situation.

Leon has pulled off some good moves, but getting Towns for Randle has got to be at the top of the list.


Wolves issue is what it was. They have Naz Reid who they want to be the 4. They need to have a good b/u. The need to get value out of moving Randle.

Best thing for them? Move Naz and Jaden McDaniels. Get back a better role player and more diverse depth.

Naz is easy to move, positive value.


He's easy to Move because he's a fantastic player....Im pretty sure they want to hold onto him.
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,482
And1: 27,168
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1363 » by Jalen Bluntson » Fri Jan 24, 2025 2:48 pm

RHODEY wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
The eternal Randle dilemma... not good enough to get a solid #2 Allstar option in return, but too good to dump for just roleplayers. A perpetual lose lose situation.

Leon has pulled off some good moves, but getting Towns for Randle has got to be at the top of the list.


Wolves issue is what it was. They have Naz Reid who they want to be the 4. They need to have a good b/u. The need to get value out of moving Randle.

Best thing for them? Move Naz and Jaden McDaniels. Get back a better role player and more diverse depth.

Naz is easy to move, positive value.


He's easy to Move because he's a fantastic player....Im pretty sure they want to hold onto him.


Nah B
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,334
And1: 22,835
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1364 » by RHODEY » Fri Jan 24, 2025 2:57 pm

Jalen Bluntson wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:
Wolves issue is what it was. They have Naz Reid who they want to be the 4. They need to have a good b/u. The need to get value out of moving Randle.

Best thing for them? Move Naz and Jaden McDaniels. Get back a better role player and more diverse depth.

Naz is easy to move, positive value.


He's easy to Move because he's a fantastic player....Im pretty sure they want to hold onto him.


Nah B

You think Minny would move Naz for roleplayers? Dude is already an elite roleplayer that the LOVE....I cant see it.
User avatar
Reign23
RealGM
Posts: 11,788
And1: 12,622
Joined: Dec 29, 2014
Location: Germany.
   

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1365 » by Reign23 » Fri Jan 24, 2025 3:04 pm

Raptors need IQ back asap to save the tank. won 4 out of 5 since he went down again.
formerly known as knickst4pe
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,482
And1: 27,168
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1366 » by Jalen Bluntson » Fri Jan 24, 2025 3:05 pm

RHODEY wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
He's easy to Move because he's a fantastic player....Im pretty sure they want to hold onto him.


Nah B

You think Minny would move Naz for roleplayers? Dude is already an elite roleplayer that the LOVE....I cant see it.


Oh. I missed that part. Thought you were talking about someone else. :lol:
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
Iron Mantis
RealGM
Posts: 27,498
And1: 28,329
Joined: Aug 12, 2006

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1367 » by Iron Mantis » Fri Jan 24, 2025 3:09 pm

Reign23 wrote:Raptors need IQ back asap to save the tank. won 4 out of 5 since he went down again.

RJ rising. Terrific young player.

He stays cutting down the Knicks' EC rivals. Put down Trae and the Hawks for us. Once a Knick.
Image
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,384
And1: 56,974
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1368 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Fri Jan 24, 2025 5:23 pm

Traded 2 non-all-stars for an all-star starter, I'd be sick if I were a Wolves fan.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1369 » by Clyde_Style » Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:20 pm

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Traded 2 non-all-stars for an all-star starter, I'd be sick if I were a Wolves fan.


One of the most embarrassing games in Randle's life has to be when we blew them out and our guys kept circling behind Randle's back to steal the ball.

Our guys knew his dubious handles so well it was like shooting fish in a barrel.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1370 » by Clyde_Style » Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:27 pm

Iron Mantis wrote:
Reign23 wrote:Raptors need IQ back asap to save the tank. won 4 out of 5 since he went down again.

RJ rising. Terrific young player.

He stays cutting down the Knicks' EC rivals. Put down Trae and the Hawks for us. Once a Knick.


RJ is still not the most efficient scorer, but I just looked as his yearly stats and he's showing a major gain in Assists presumably because he's setting up plays more, but with that he does have an increase in TO (though the Assist to TO ratio is still probably improved). He has increased his rebounding and steal numbers as well. Guy is solid. To be excellent he needs to improve his shooting percentages.
Anthony Davis
Freshman
Posts: 53
And1: 149
Joined: Mar 06, 2012

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1371 » by Anthony Davis » Fri Jan 24, 2025 7:45 pm

This might be the wrong place to ask but is there a section that allows buying/selling of Knicks tickets if it's allowed here? If not, what do you guys use?
Ray Williams
Head Coach
Posts: 6,088
And1: 2,597
Joined: Aug 13, 2001

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1372 » by Ray Williams » Fri Jan 24, 2025 8:32 pm

I would like to say Fk Rick Pitino. When we drafted Kevin Knox all we heard predraft from Pitino was how great Knox was going to be but didn’t hear a peep from him about SGA. Fk you Rick Pitino.
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1373 » by nykballa2k4 » Fri Jan 24, 2025 11:19 pm

RHODEY wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
The eternal Randle dilemma... not good enough to get a solid #2 Allstar option in return, but too good to dump for just roleplayers. A perpetual lose lose situation.

Leon has pulled off some good moves, but getting Towns for Randle has got to be at the top of the list.


Wolves issue is what it was. They have Naz Reid who they want to be the 4. They need to have a good b/u. The need to get value out of moving Randle.

Best thing for them? Move Naz and Jaden McDaniels. Get back a better role player and more diverse depth.

Naz is easy to move, positive value.


He's easy to Move because he's a fantastic player....Im pretty sure they want to hold onto him.


The way I see it -- Randle is good a competitive NOW team. Wolves see Gobert-Reid-McDaniel as the future front court (I think)
No one is trading a top-5 prospect for Randle (which could have been demanded for KAT) so no Randle trade will visibly return on that investment. They MIGHT be able to trade Gobert in the summer if they want to extend Randle or Randle opts in. They need to free up cap though for their current expiring guys.

Trading Reid allow them to trade from a better position, perhaps get a more favorable asset, and protects them from a ballooning cap number next year.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,482
And1: 27,168
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1374 » by Jalen Bluntson » Fri Jan 24, 2025 11:25 pm

Ray Williams wrote:I would like to say Fk Rick Pitino. When we drafted Kevin Knox all we heard predraft from Pitino was how great Knox was going to be but didn’t hear a peep from him about SGA. Fk you Rick Pitino.


Ummm... wasn't that Calipari?
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,334
And1: 22,835
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1375 » by RHODEY » Fri Jan 24, 2025 11:33 pm

nykballa2k4 wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:
Wolves issue is what it was. They have Naz Reid who they want to be the 4. They need to have a good b/u. The need to get value out of moving Randle.

Best thing for them? Move Naz and Jaden McDaniels. Get back a better role player and more diverse depth.

Naz is easy to move, positive value.


He's easy to Move because he's a fantastic player....Im pretty sure they want to hold onto him.


The way I see it -- Randle is good a competitive NOW team. Wolves see Gobert-Reid-McDaniel as the future front court (I think)
No one is trading a top-5 prospect for Randle (which could have been demanded for KAT) so no Randle trade will visibly return on that investment. They MIGHT be able to trade Gobert in the summer if they want to extend Randle or Randle opts in. They need to free up cap though for their current expiring guys.

Trading Reid allow them to trade from a better position, perhaps get a more favorable asset, and protects them from a ballooning cap number next year.

The problem is Randle is a poor fit there...he makes them worse.... so if you keep him you are committing to being worse.
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1376 » by nykballa2k4 » Fri Jan 24, 2025 11:51 pm

RHODEY wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
He's easy to Move because he's a fantastic player....Im pretty sure they want to hold onto him.


The way I see it -- Randle is good a competitive NOW team. Wolves see Gobert-Reid-McDaniel as the future front court (I think)
No one is trading a top-5 prospect for Randle (which could have been demanded for KAT) so no Randle trade will visibly return on that investment. They MIGHT be able to trade Gobert in the summer if they want to extend Randle or Randle opts in. They need to free up cap though for their current expiring guys.

Trading Reid allow them to trade from a better position, perhaps get a more favorable asset, and protects them from a ballooning cap number next year.

The problem is Randle is a poor fit there...he makes them worse.... so if you keep him you are committing to being worse.

https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/minnesota-timberwolves-plus-minus-leaders
Randle is #3 in the teams +/-
Highest of the forward/centers. He objectively makes them better.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
Ray Williams
Head Coach
Posts: 6,088
And1: 2,597
Joined: Aug 13, 2001

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1377 » by Ray Williams » Sat Jan 25, 2025 12:49 pm

Jalen Bluntson wrote:
Ray Williams wrote:I would like to say Fk Rick Pitino. When we drafted Kevin Knox all we heard predraft from Pitino was how great Knox was going to be but didn’t hear a peep from him about SGA. Fk you Rick Pitino.


Ummm... wasn't that Calipari?

lol, dementia settling in, they morphed into one guy. Fk Calipari
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,632
And1: 5,758
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1378 » by spree2kawhi » Sat Jan 25, 2025 10:46 pm

nykballa2k4 wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:
The way I see it -- Randle is good a competitive NOW team. Wolves see Gobert-Reid-McDaniel as the future front court (I think)
No one is trading a top-5 prospect for Randle (which could have been demanded for KAT) so no Randle trade will visibly return on that investment. They MIGHT be able to trade Gobert in the summer if they want to extend Randle or Randle opts in. They need to free up cap though for their current expiring guys.

Trading Reid allow them to trade from a better position, perhaps get a more favorable asset, and protects them from a ballooning cap number next year.

The problem is Randle is a poor fit there...he makes them worse.... so if you keep him you are committing to being worse.

https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/minnesota-timberwolves-plus-minus-leaders
Randle is #3 in the teams +/-
Highest of the forward/centers. He objectively makes them better.

Numbers don’t tell Randle’s story too well. We should all know that by now.
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1379 » by nykballa2k4 » Sat Jan 25, 2025 11:20 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:
RHODEY wrote:The problem is Randle is a poor fit there...he makes them worse.... so if you keep him you are committing to being worse.

https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/minnesota-timberwolves-plus-minus-leaders
Randle is #3 in the teams +/-
Highest of the forward/centers. He objectively makes them better.

Numbers don’t tell Randle’s story too well. We should all know that by now.

Iso-randle in the last minute of a game is not a good decision. That should be able to be coached around.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
Najeem27
RealGM
Posts: 11,551
And1: 3,642
Joined: Apr 13, 2012

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1380 » by Najeem27 » Sun Jan 26, 2025 2:04 am

Return to New York Knicks