The KnicksFix wrote:
Who would trade for Mitch, he’s injured and hasn’t played in a year
McDonalds.
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85
The KnicksFix wrote:
Who would trade for Mitch, he’s injured and hasn’t played in a year
PrecociousNeoph wrote: dolan ruins every picture he's in.
The KnicksFix wrote:
Who would trade for Mitch, he’s injured and hasn’t played in a year
RHODEY wrote:Guano wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
Ok. I predicted Big V from the Wizards yesterday, then said Boucher today.
I think it's the Wiz, and the trade happens.
https://www.spotrac.com/nba/player/_/id/8055/jonas-valanciunas
https://www.spotrac.com/nba/player/_/id/27002/mitchell-robinson
Even if Mitch is hurt, Wiz still get out of 1 year of Valanciunas
Knicks give them their pick back, which is more valuable to them than it is the Knicks.
Knicks deal out of the bottom of the C deck for Whitmore with Sims.
I don't even specifically like the valanciunas trade, just seems like what will go down.
Big = aging vet (not a wing), to the Knicks (a contender) and Wiz get better than some 2nds, the "2nds" the Knicks possess from the Wiz would revert back to being a 1st round pick for them. Which is pretty valuable for a team that absolutely sucks balls.
Idk enough to have an opinion on Whitmore but idc at this point. We need a wing who can eat some mins.
Also don't know sht about Boucher but I know enough about val to know he sucks. So I'll go work the former.
He sucks?I prefer a healthy Mitch...but .... nah.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Guano wrote:RHODEY wrote:Guano wrote:
Idk enough to have an opinion on Whitmore but idc at this point. We need a wing who can eat some mins.
Also don't know sht about Boucher but I know enough about val to know he sucks. So I'll go work the former.
He sucks?I prefer a healthy Mitch...but .... nah.
Meh, can't defend for sht. Big for nothing.
Guano wrote:RHODEY wrote:Guano wrote:
Idk enough to have an opinion on Whitmore but idc at this point. We need a wing who can eat some mins.
Also don't know sht about Boucher but I know enough about val to know he sucks. So I'll go work the former.
He sucks?I prefer a healthy Mitch...but .... nah.
Meh, can't defend for sht. Big for nothing.


RHODEY wrote:Guano wrote:RHODEY wrote:He sucks?I prefer a healthy Mitch...but .... nah.
Meh, can't defend for sht. Big for nothing.
Chislic wrote:RHODEY wrote:Guano wrote:
Meh, can't defend for sht. Big for nothing.
Here is what Valanciunas did against the lakers tonight...
5 PTS (1 for 8 FGM) 3 REB -24 +/-
Keep in mind, this is a Lakers team without Anthony Davis...

RHODEY wrote:Guano wrote:RHODEY wrote:He sucks?I prefer a healthy Mitch...but .... nah.
Meh, can't defend for sht. Big for nothing.
Jokic cant defend for nothing either. But what he does do makes up for it. Val is a poor mans version of that IMO. Again I prefer a healthy Mitch, but if he isn't healthy I would gladly take Val.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Chislic wrote:RHODEY wrote:Guano wrote:
Meh, can't defend for sht. Big for nothing.
Here is what Valanciunas did against the lakers tonight...
5 PTS (1 for 8 FGM) 3 REB -24 +/-
Keep in mind, this is a Lakers team without Anthony Davis...
Guano wrote:RHODEY wrote:Guano wrote:
Meh, can't defend for sht. Big for nothing.
Jokic cant defend for nothing either. But what he does do makes up for it. Val is a poor mans version of that IMO. Again I prefer a healthy Mitch, but if he isn't healthy I would gladly take Val.
Rather gamble on mitch coming back than have a big that is a complete defensive liability.
thebuzzardman wrote:Guano wrote:RHODEY wrote:He sucks?I prefer a healthy Mitch...but .... nah.
Meh, can't defend for sht. Big for nothing.
Don't like it all you want. He's a CAA client, Thibs like bigs that rebound and pass, the salaries are close, and of all the sh*tty pick assets they have left, the Wiz getting theirs back is the highest.
I'd rather not. I'd rather Boucher or Stewart or just keep Mitch, get a cheap wing like Green or Whitmore.
Just feels like they want to do this. Not me. Them.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
robillionaire wrote:Guano wrote:RHODEY wrote:
Jokic cant defend for nothing either. But what he does do makes up for it. Val is a poor mans version of that IMO. Again I prefer a healthy Mitch, but if he isn't healthy I would gladly take Val.
Rather gamble on mitch coming back than have a big that is a complete defensive liability.
But Mitch is a complete offensive liability and our bench already struggles to score most the time
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
3toheadmelo wrote:Mitch is probably gone. It sounds like something went wrong with his rehab. Not sure who would take him though if he can’t even play this season
Ok so lets look at his averagesChislic wrote:RHODEY wrote:Guano wrote:
Meh, can't defend for sht. Big for nothing.
Here is what Valanciunas did against the lakers tonight...
5 PTS (1 for 8 FGM) 3 REB -24 +/-
Keep in mind, this is a Lakers team without Anthony Davis...
