ImageImageImage

The Julius Randle Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

TimberKat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,978
And1: 3,016
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#341 » by TimberKat » Sat Feb 1, 2025 4:36 am

Any update on his injury?
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,061
And1: 5,697
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#342 » by winforlose » Sat Feb 1, 2025 7:16 am

TimberKat wrote:Any update on his injury?


The language used is strain, and he was ruled out for tomorrow.
TimberKat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,978
And1: 3,016
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#343 » by TimberKat » Sat Feb 1, 2025 2:36 pm

winforlose wrote:
TimberKat wrote:Any update on his injury?


The language used is strain, and he was ruled out for tomorrow.

Google said strain groin typically takes 4 to 8 weeks to heal.
DaMplsKid
Junior
Posts: 342
And1: 158
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
       

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#344 » by DaMplsKid » Sat Feb 1, 2025 7:24 pm

Not sure where to post this question. If Randle opts back in this offseason. Can we trade him right away? Or is there a period of time we have to wait? Also, if he opts in can we still sign Naz and Naw with idea of trading Randle ASAP?

I think he will have more value this offseason if he opts in. Then it is a completely expiring contact for the next team.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#345 » by shangrila » Sat Feb 1, 2025 8:20 pm

DaMplsKid wrote:Not sure where to post this question. If Randle opts back in this offseason. Can we trade him right away? Or is there a period of time we have to wait? Also, if he opts in can we still sign Naz and Naw with idea of trading Randle ASAP?

I think he will have more value this offseason if he opts in. Then it is a completely expiring contact for the next team.

I believe the only restriction is what date he becomes eligible for trading, which is true for a lot of other contracts.

Basically we can't trade him on draft night because it's still technically this NBA financial year and his option leaves him in limbo until it's officially acknowledged as picked up or declined. But after the new financial year, his option is official and he's just another contract.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,584
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#346 » by shangrila » Sat Feb 1, 2025 8:21 pm

If this is the version we're getting with Randle though, I wouldn't mind if he was kept long term.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,668
And1: 3,353
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#347 » by BlacJacMac » Sun Feb 2, 2025 12:27 am

Read on Twitter
?s=46
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,061
And1: 5,697
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#348 » by winforlose » Sun Feb 2, 2025 12:50 am

BlacJacMac wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46


Not surprised. The team is calling it a strain. Timber KAT said it a few posts back, 4-8 weeks for a strain. So ideally around the week after the break. Worst case late March.
Loaf_of_bread
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,363
And1: 642
Joined: Nov 21, 2023
     

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#349 » by Loaf_of_bread » Sun Feb 2, 2025 12:50 am

BlacJacMac wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46


Alright, let's find out how we play without him. I, for one have been of the mindset of addition by subtraction when it comes to julius.

He has looked like he was buying into our "culture" as of late..

But, let's see how we do.
TheZachAttack
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,764
And1: 1,325
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
       

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#350 » by TheZachAttack » Mon Feb 3, 2025 4:31 am

shangrila wrote:If this is the version we're getting with Randle though, I wouldn't mind if he was kept long term.


I think the biggest issue with Randle long term is some of the negative vibes if Randle’s rotation minutes look more like Naw/Naz where they increase in games they are playing well and when they have good matchups but decrease in the times they don’t and you don’t have to worry about playing them in closing minutes other than games where they are hot.

The wolves biggest advantage is their theoretical versatility and depth — but we don’t lean into that versatility and play rotations based on matchups and game flow. I do think there’s a world where Julius is starting to get older and potentially with a decent multi-year contract is more fine with playing more like a role player.

I think Ant and Dante are the only players who should get 35 minutes every night — and Rob has the potential to get there
FrenchMinnyFan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,938
And1: 1,151
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
     

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#351 » by FrenchMinnyFan » Mon Feb 3, 2025 4:34 am

Time for Naz to show up. Hope his injury is not serious. We probably have to keep Randle next year...
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,304
And1: 19,319
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#352 » by shrink » Mon Feb 3, 2025 1:50 pm

I think that Randle’s injury could be Minott’s last chance to prove himself. We’ll see Jaden play more back up PF, but Naz is also our only decent back up for Gobert, so if there is a time for a back up big to shine, this is the opportunity.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,603
And1: 5,109
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#353 » by minimus » Mon Feb 3, 2025 2:07 pm

shrink wrote:I think that Randle’s injury could be Minott’s last chance to prove himself. We’ll see Jaden play more back up PF, but Naz is also our only decent back up for Gobert, so if there is a time for a back up big to shine, this is the opportunity.


Minnesota actually could use a defensive minded comboforward in last game against WAS, when Kuzma got hot.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#354 » by moss_is_1 » Mon Feb 3, 2025 2:33 pm

We went from having good injury luck and people wanting Finch to play young guys like Minott, Shannon, Clark, Dillingham, etc to now having too many injuries and being forced to play Ingles.

If Leonard Miller or Minott can play at all then their chance will be in the next couple of weeks. Clark took his chance and ran with it.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,061
And1: 5,697
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#355 » by winforlose » Mon Feb 3, 2025 7:13 pm

moss_is_1 wrote:We went from having good injury luck and people wanting Finch to play young guys like Minott, Shannon, Clark, Dillingham, etc to now having too many injuries and being forced to play Ingles.

If Leonard Miller or Minott can play at all then their chance will be in the next couple of weeks. Clark took his chance and ran with it.


1. If you had played the young guys more earlier, then they would be more ready to play when needed.

2. Finch has an issue with Miller and Minott which became obvious when he went back to Garza instead of going to Miller, and played Ingles in the 3rd instead of going to Minott. Finch even talked about trying to save his key group till the 4th. Well if Ingles is part of that group, why not run Minott for those minutes? The answer is Finch and Minott have a beef, (Jack Borman mentioned something about Minott’s social media during the post game locked on episode,) and that beef is causing problems. Shannon being available and having had a few days to ramp up should help as he might be able to eat 6-10 minutes and contribute some offense. I have Shannon between 8th and 9th in total team offensive pecking order.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,837
And1: 22,420
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#356 » by Klomp » Mon Feb 3, 2025 7:22 pm

winforlose wrote:1. If you had played the young guys more earlier, then they would be more ready to play when needed.

Maybe. Maybe not.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,668
And1: 3,353
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#357 » by BlacJacMac » Mon Feb 3, 2025 7:23 pm

winforlose wrote:
moss_is_1 wrote:We went from having good injury luck and people wanting Finch to play young guys like Minott, Shannon, Clark, Dillingham, etc to now having too many injuries and being forced to play Ingles.

If Leonard Miller or Minott can play at all then their chance will be in the next couple of weeks. Clark took his chance and ran with it.


1. If you had played the young guys more earlier, then they would be more ready to play when needed.

2. Finch has an issue with Miller and Minott which became obvious when he went back to Garza instead of going to Miller, and played Ingles in the 3rd instead of going to Minott. Finch even talked about trying to save his key group till the 4th. Well if Ingles is part of that group, why not run Minott for those minutes? The answer is Finch and Minott have a beef, (Jack Borman mentioned something about Minott’s social media during the post game locked on episode,) and that beef is causing problems. Shannon being available and having had a few days to ramp up should help as he might be able to eat 6-10 minutes and contribute some offense. I have Shannon between 8th and 9th in total team offensive pecking order.


When he tweeted from the bench during a game...
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,061
And1: 5,697
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#358 » by winforlose » Mon Feb 3, 2025 7:28 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
winforlose wrote:
moss_is_1 wrote:We went from having good injury luck and people wanting Finch to play young guys like Minott, Shannon, Clark, Dillingham, etc to now having too many injuries and being forced to play Ingles.

If Leonard Miller or Minott can play at all then their chance will be in the next couple of weeks. Clark took his chance and ran with it.


1. If you had played the young guys more earlier, then they would be more ready to play when needed.

2. Finch has an issue with Miller and Minott which became obvious when he went back to Garza instead of going to Miller, and played Ingles in the 3rd instead of going to Minott. Finch even talked about trying to save his key group till the 4th. Well if Ingles is part of that group, why not run Minott for those minutes? The answer is Finch and Minott have a beef, (Jack Borman mentioned something about Minott’s social media during the post game locked on episode,) and that beef is causing problems. Shannon being available and having had a few days to ramp up should help as he might be able to eat 6-10 minutes and contribute some offense. I have Shannon between 8th and 9th in total team offensive pecking order.


When he tweeted from the bench during a game...


What did he tweet? I don’t have social media accounts and know nothing about this.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,668
And1: 3,353
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#359 » by BlacJacMac » Mon Feb 3, 2025 8:05 pm

winforlose wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:
winforlose wrote:
1. If you had played the young guys more earlier, then they would be more ready to play when needed.

2. Finch has an issue with Miller and Minott which became obvious when he went back to Garza instead of going to Miller, and played Ingles in the 3rd instead of going to Minott. Finch even talked about trying to save his key group till the 4th. Well if Ingles is part of that group, why not run Minott for those minutes? The answer is Finch and Minott have a beef, (Jack Borman mentioned something about Minott’s social media during the post game locked on episode,) and that beef is causing problems. Shannon being available and having had a few days to ramp up should help as he might be able to eat 6-10 minutes and contribute some offense. I have Shannon between 8th and 9th in total team offensive pecking order.


When he tweeted from the bench during a game...


What did he tweet? I don’t have social media accounts and know nothing about this.


Read on Twitter
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,668
And1: 3,353
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: The Julius Randle Thread 

Post#360 » by BlacJacMac » Mon Feb 3, 2025 8:07 pm

Comments on the tweet right after it was posted:

Image

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves