ImageImage

Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything?

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,166
And1: 3,114
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1001 » by PDXKnight » Mon Feb 3, 2025 5:17 am

Walton1one wrote:BTW, so much for no team willing to trade first round picks because of the new CBA

My other thought is, with Lavine, going to SAC, where does that leave teams like MIL, MIA, PHX, GS, LAC,CKE, DET, MEM & DEN?

A lot of teams out there that could use some veteran players, let’s hope that one of them wants a POR player & Cronin isn’t too much of a idiot to not make it a deal


I'm curious where Butler ends up. If the Bucks strike out on him wouldn't be surprised to see that Grant to the Bucks idea become reality
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,111
And1: 21,742
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1002 » by DusterBuster » Mon Feb 3, 2025 5:42 am

PDXKnight wrote:
Wizenheimer wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
I don’t know about the trade idea, but there’s already reports the Lakers are aggressively targeting one of Nic Claxton or Robert Williams


also rumors they are shopping Reaves

Timelord for Reaves works. both have about the same salary

so, Timelord for Reaves + Blazer option to swap 2031 picks. Luca will be 32 by then and probably 300 pounds. Might be a good swap.

but if they can land Claxton, that's a better deal for them


We dont need reeves, honestly something like kleber plus a first swap option + a couple seconds would be fine by me. Or set up a magic Ant deal to land us another 1st or 2 so reeves doesn't give us even more of a logjam


While I think future picks from teams like the Bucks and Suns make sense, future picks from the Lakers are and always will be a bad bet. **** like this will always just “happen” for the Lakers.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,166
And1: 3,114
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1003 » by PDXKnight » Mon Feb 3, 2025 5:47 am

DusterBuster wrote:
PDXKnight wrote:
Wizenheimer wrote:
also rumors they are shopping Reaves

Timelord for Reaves works. both have about the same salary

so, Timelord for Reaves + Blazer option to swap 2031 picks. Luca will be 32 by then and probably 300 pounds. Might be a good swap.

but if they can land Claxton, that's a better deal for them


We dont need reeves, honestly something like kleber plus a first swap option + a couple seconds would be fine by me. Or set up a magic Ant deal to land us another 1st or 2 so reeves doesn't give us even more of a logjam


While I think future picks from teams like the Bucks and Suns make sense, future picks from the Lakers are and always will be a bad bet. **** like this will always just “happen” for the Lakers.


Oh i agree whole heartedly. But it's a trade asset moving forward and any 1st is better than no 1st for ant which is what it might become if we wait too long
Village Idiot
General Manager
Posts: 9,508
And1: 2,216
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1004 » by Village Idiot » Mon Feb 3, 2025 6:15 am

I have Sacramento winning the deal as I regard Lavine as a better fit and player.

Fox is a bad shooter and off-ball player ans not a great defender. Not sure that I see how this improves the Spurs, especially with so many talented guards in this draft. Playing him alongside Castle and Sochan means three sub-par shooters in the line-up.

Chicago finally starts the rebuild. I expect Vuc to be traded to LAL or GS this week.

With Fox off the board, does this strengthen the case for Simons to Orlando?
"There are no right answers to wrong questions." - Ursula K. Le Guin
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,744
And1: 396
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1005 » by Butter » Mon Feb 3, 2025 11:49 am

Village Idiot wrote:I have Sacramento winning the deal as I regard Lavine as a better fit and player.

Fox is a bad shooter and off-ball player ans not a great defender. Not sure that I see how this improves the Spurs, especially with so many talented guards in this draft. Playing him alongside Castle and Sochan means three sub-par shooters in the line-up.

Chicago finally starts the rebuild. I expect Vuc to be traded to LAL or GS this week.

With Fox off the board, does this strengthen the case for Simons to Orlando?


ID bet it's down to Simon's and Sexton
Rip City, baby!!!!
Sinobas
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,802
And1: 609
Joined: Jun 20, 2008

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1006 » by Sinobas » Mon Feb 3, 2025 2:38 pm

DusterBuster wrote:
PDXKnight wrote:
Wizenheimer wrote:
also rumors they are shopping Reaves

Timelord for Reaves works. both have about the same salary

so, Timelord for Reaves + Blazer option to swap 2031 picks. Luca will be 32 by then and probably 300 pounds. Might be a good swap.

but if they can land Claxton, that's a better deal for them


We dont need reeves, honestly something like kleber plus a first swap option + a couple seconds would be fine by me. Or set up a magic Ant deal to land us another 1st or 2 so reeves doesn't give us even more of a logjam


While I think future picks from teams like the Bucks and Suns make sense, future picks from the Lakers are and always will be a bad bet. **** like this will always just “happen” for the Lakers.


I'd take one from LA if it's totally unprotected.
Sinobas
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,802
And1: 609
Joined: Jun 20, 2008

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1007 » by Sinobas » Mon Feb 3, 2025 2:40 pm

Norm2953 wrote:If only the Lakers would take on Ayton.....


Ayton would help their team, and I'm in no mood to give LA anything. People dump on him a lot, but he's not a bad player.

Plus, the Blazers really have no incentive to dump Ayton, his contract expires next year.
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,557
And1: 1,270
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1008 » by tester551 » Mon Feb 3, 2025 3:27 pm

Butter wrote:
Village Idiot wrote:I have Sacramento winning the deal as I regard Lavine as a better fit and player.

Fox is a bad shooter and off-ball player ans not a great defender. Not sure that I see how this improves the Spurs, especially with so many talented guards in this draft. Playing him alongside Castle and Sochan means three sub-par shooters in the line-up.

Chicago finally starts the rebuild. I expect Vuc to be traded to LAL or GS this week.

With Fox off the board, does this strengthen the case for Simons to Orlando?


ID bet it's down to Simon's and Sexton

Magic fans think they're in the running for Cam Johnson.

Also a few think they might target Tre Jones.
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,111
And1: 21,742
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1009 » by DusterBuster » Mon Feb 3, 2025 4:05 pm

Sinobas wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
PDXKnight wrote:
We dont need reeves, honestly something like kleber plus a first swap option + a couple seconds would be fine by me. Or set up a magic Ant deal to land us another 1st or 2 so reeves doesn't give us even more of a logjam


While I think future picks from teams like the Bucks and Suns make sense, future picks from the Lakers are and always will be a bad bet. **** like this will always just “happen” for the Lakers.


I'd take one from LA if it's totally unprotected.


I mean sure, I would take an unprotected from any team, but any Lakers pick is realistically outside the lottery without a bad injury year - but no way to guess if/when that happens.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 9,069
And1: 3,630
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1010 » by zzaj » Mon Feb 3, 2025 4:43 pm

tester551 wrote:
Butter wrote:
Village Idiot wrote:I have Sacramento winning the deal as I regard Lavine as a better fit and player.

Fox is a bad shooter and off-ball player ans not a great defender. Not sure that I see how this improves the Spurs, especially with so many talented guards in this draft. Playing him alongside Castle and Sochan means three sub-par shooters in the line-up.

Chicago finally starts the rebuild. I expect Vuc to be traded to LAL or GS this week.

With Fox off the board, does this strengthen the case for Simons to Orlando?


ID bet it's down to Simon's and Sexton

Magic fans think they're in the running for Cam Johnson.

Also a few think they might target Tre Jones.


That would make sense...this is why players like Simons aren't that valuable--you can find similar players fairly easy. Why give up assets to get a Simons when you can just draft an 80% of Simons in Tre?
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,111
And1: 21,742
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1011 » by DusterBuster » Mon Feb 3, 2025 4:59 pm

zzaj wrote:
tester551 wrote:
Butter wrote:
ID bet it's down to Simon's and Sexton

Magic fans think they're in the running for Cam Johnson.

Also a few think they might target Tre Jones.


That would make sense...this is why players like Simons aren't that valuable--you can find similar players fairly easy. Why give up assets to get a Simons when you can just draft an 80% of Simons in Tre?


That 80% of player X argument isn't super strong though. How often is it the best move to get the worse play. Heat had the same 80% argument when they lost out on Dame but got Terry Rozier. How'd that work out?

It's like if you are looking to buy two cars. One is cheaper, but has a few things to fix and a few mechanical issues, or one that's more expensive but in perfect condition. Always buy that latter because to save money in the first car, you're going to end up spending the money to need to fix it anyway, so you end up not getting the car you want because you wanted to save a few bucks.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,747
And1: 14,101
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1012 » by JRoy » Mon Feb 3, 2025 5:11 pm

Village Idiot wrote:I have Sacramento winning the deal as I regard Lavine as a better fit and player.

Fox is a bad shooter and off-ball player ans not a great defender. Not sure that I see how this improves the Spurs, especially with so many talented guards in this draft. Playing him alongside Castle and Sochan means three sub-par shooters in the line-up.

Chicago finally starts the rebuild. I expect Vuc to be traded to LAL or GS this week.

With Fox off the board, does this strengthen the case for Simons to Orlando?


I think Fox is hugely overrated but I understand SAS making this move. Good for CHI too, is this the best SAC could do?
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 9,069
And1: 3,630
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1013 » by zzaj » Mon Feb 3, 2025 5:33 pm

DusterBuster wrote:
zzaj wrote:
tester551 wrote:Magic fans think they're in the running for Cam Johnson.

Also a few think they might target Tre Jones.


That would make sense...this is why players like Simons aren't that valuable--you can find similar players fairly easy. Why give up assets to get a Simons when you can just draft an 80% of Simons in Tre?


That 80% of player X argument isn't super strong though. How often is it the best move to get the worse play. Heat had the same 80% argument when they lost out on Dame but got Terry Rozier. How'd that work out?

It's like if you are looking to buy two cars. One is cheaper, but has a few things to fix and a few mechanical issues, or one that's more expensive but in perfect condition. Always buy that latter because to save money in the first car, you're going to end up spending the money to need to fix it anyway, so you end up not getting the car you want because you wanted to save a few bucks.


It's not as simple as a buying a used car analogy, though. Orlando has a lot of cars and is involved in a race for #1, with constraints on how they can utilize their resources.

Simons is on a contract. Orlando would have to give up assets in order to obtain him. "Assets" aren't analogous to money (as in currency to buy a used car) it would require other "cars" in this case.

I think that an NBA GM would definitely prefer the known commodity of a Simons or a Cam, but it may be worth it for Orlando to roll the dice on a Tre Jones (whose to say he doesn't end up being 120% of Simons?) on a rookie contract with years of cost control?

IDK what the move is here...but I feel like if Orlando was serious about obtaining Simons and Portland was serious about letting him go, it would have been done by now.
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 9,069
And1: 3,630
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1014 » by zzaj » Mon Feb 3, 2025 5:40 pm

JRoy wrote:
Village Idiot wrote:I have Sacramento winning the deal as I regard Lavine as a better fit and player.

Fox is a bad shooter and off-ball player ans not a great defender. Not sure that I see how this improves the Spurs, especially with so many talented guards in this draft. Playing him alongside Castle and Sochan means three sub-par shooters in the line-up.

Chicago finally starts the rebuild. I expect Vuc to be traded to LAL or GS this week.

With Fox off the board, does this strengthen the case for Simons to Orlando?


I think Fox is hugely overrated but I understand SAS making this move. Good for CHI too, is this the best SAC could do?


It seems Fox clearly wanted to go to San Antonio. I think that FOs tend to try and honor player destination requests a lot more than we realize...for better or for worse.

San Antonio has a nice little core of Fox/Castle/Wemby with a couple of Vets that shouldn't get in their way.

Edit: Also, San Antonio REALLY needs shooting though...I wouldn't be surprised if they reached with one of their lotto picks on McNeeley or a shooter like that...
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,747
And1: 14,101
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1015 » by JRoy » Mon Feb 3, 2025 5:42 pm

zzaj wrote:
JRoy wrote:
Village Idiot wrote:I have Sacramento winning the deal as I regard Lavine as a better fit and player.

Fox is a bad shooter and off-ball player ans not a great defender. Not sure that I see how this improves the Spurs, especially with so many talented guards in this draft. Playing him alongside Castle and Sochan means three sub-par shooters in the line-up.

Chicago finally starts the rebuild. I expect Vuc to be traded to LAL or GS this week.

With Fox off the board, does this strengthen the case for Simons to Orlando?


I think Fox is hugely overrated but I understand SAS making this move. Good for CHI too, is this the best SAC could do?


It seems Fox clearly wanted to go to San Antonio. I think that FOs tend to try and honor player destination requests a lot more than we realize...for better or for worse.

San Antonio has a nice little core of Fox/Castle/Wemby with a couple of Vets that shouldn't get in their way.


They will be good, just not convinced Fox was the right guard.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,177
And1: 1,211
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1016 » by Walton1one » Mon Feb 3, 2025 6:01 pm

Butter wrote:
Village Idiot wrote:I have Sacramento winning the deal as I regard Lavine as a better fit and player.

Fox is a bad shooter and off-ball player ans not a great defender. Not sure that I see how this improves the Spurs, especially with so many talented guards in this draft. Playing him alongside Castle and Sochan means three sub-par shooters in the line-up.

Chicago finally starts the rebuild. I expect Vuc to be traded to LAL or GS this week.

With Fox off the board, does this strengthen the case for Simons to Orlando?


ID bet it's down to Simon's and Sexton


Would you believe Sexton is a worse defender than Simons?

Sexton 123.3 DRTG, Simons is 120.4 DRTG
Sexton ranks as the worst, Simons ranks 5th, Sharpe (benched for his defense) ranks 12th

I think Lavine to SAC could work out out for them. I don't think it takes them out of the playoff hunt.

The picks they received back were meh:

- the 25 CHA pick is basically (2) future 2nd's as it obviously not conveying
- the 27 SA pick, most likely late teens\twenties? Anything can happen of course, and it is unprotected,but chances are it won't be that great of a pick
- The 31 MIN 1st, unprotected, could be the best of the bunch, but it is so far out there, hard to know

Surprisingly, the best pick traded was CHI getting their own 1st back, which for them pivoting into a tank, was a brilliant move by them. Many were saying they would have to pay a 1st to get off Lavine's contract, not only did they trade Lavine, but they got their lottery 1st back & they also got some expiring money in Jones ($9mil) & both Collins ($18mil) & Juerter ($18 mil) expire after next season

The CHI pick was protected 1-10 this year, then 1-8\1-8 in 26 & 27, it was likely to convey this year.

So SAC took discounted picks to get Lavine back essentially, they got (5) 2nd's basically and (1) mediocre pick and (1) who knows, could be good pick.

I am really surprised they could not get at least (1) of the ATL picks (25', 27') that SA has, nor did they get the swap back in 31' that they owe to SA.
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,177
And1: 1,211
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1017 » by Walton1one » Mon Feb 3, 2025 6:11 pm

tester551 wrote:
Butter wrote:
Village Idiot wrote:I have Sacramento winning the deal as I regard Lavine as a better fit and player.

Fox is a bad shooter and off-ball player ans not a great defender. Not sure that I see how this improves the Spurs, especially with so many talented guards in this draft. Playing him alongside Castle and Sochan means three sub-par shooters in the line-up.

Chicago finally starts the rebuild. I expect Vuc to be traded to LAL or GS this week.

With Fox off the board, does this strengthen the case for Simons to Orlando?


ID bet it's down to Simon's and Sexton

Magic fans think they're in the running for Cam Johnson.

Also a few think they might target Tre Jones.


Yeah, ORL just does not seem to be that interested in Simons, kind of chasing every player but him. Makes you wonder if they have had discussions with Cronin and the asking price is ridiculous, so they have moved on. If Cronin wanted (2) 1st's for example or a 1st & Black, then ORL is right to move on, better off spending those (2) 1st's on Cam Johnson, who is a better player on a better contract.

Even Sexton's stats are better than Simons this year:
18.7ppg 47.8% FG - 41.4% 3ptFG

Simons is, 18.2ppg 42.4% FG - 36.9% 3ptFG%

I think it could be that rumors are true about Cronin, he sets unrealistic prices on his players and refuses to move off them. Hope I am wrong, but certainly doesn't appear to be the case so far.
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,177
And1: 1,211
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1018 » by Walton1one » Mon Feb 3, 2025 6:45 pm

Curious to see how the Suns play tonight with rumors that they are listening to offers on Durant...

Read on Twitter


Also, LAL is looking at Mitchell Robinson. I think they would need a 3rd team though.

Read on Twitter
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1886452261955727765%7Ctwgr%5E76e64238f431105ce64f8834c165e9f374fe95ab%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fforums.realgm.com%2Fboards%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ft%3D2431888start%3D620
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,084
And1: 2,393
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1019 » by DaVoiceMaster » Mon Feb 3, 2025 6:54 pm

Walton1one wrote:
tester551 wrote:
Butter wrote:
ID bet it's down to Simon's and Sexton

Magic fans think they're in the running for Cam Johnson.

Also a few think they might target Tre Jones.


Yeah, ORL just does not seem to be that interested in Simons, kind of chasing every player but him. Makes you wonder if they have had discussions with Cronin and the asking price is ridiculous, so they have moved on. If Cronin wanted (2) 1st's for example or a 1st & Black, then ORL is right to move on, better off spending those (2) 1st's on Cam Johnson, who is a better player on a better contract.

Even Sexton's stats are better than Simons this year:
18.7ppg 47.8% FG - 41.4% 3ptFG

Simons is, 18.2ppg 42.4% FG - 36.9% 3ptFG%

I think it could be that rumors are true about Cronin, he sets unrealistic prices on his players and refuses to move off them. Hope I am wrong, but certainly doesn't appear to be the case so far.


Perhaps Orlando already reached out to Portland and they said Simon's is not available.
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
Sinobas
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,802
And1: 609
Joined: Jun 20, 2008

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1020 » by Sinobas » Mon Feb 3, 2025 7:09 pm

I wonder if the Cavs would be interested in Jerami Grant, to bolster their roster, since they are in "win now" mode.

We'd take Lavert, Naing, a filler and a pick.

Or maybe not even ask for a pick...basically a give away. Grant's production this year does not making him as enticing...

Return to Portland Trail Blazers