hugepatsfan wrote: Have to chalk it up as an L for Brad and the FO to give a (good) 2nd rounder for him, get basically nothing, and then pay a (seemingly not good) 2nd to dump him.
Eh, idk about that.
We traded the 41st pick for Springer. I wouldn't call that a good 2nd rounder. The hit rate is so low on 2nd round picks, it might be reaching to call any of them "good".
If I was going to call any 2nd rounder a good 2nd rounder, it would be a one that's in the first 3-5 picks of the 2nd round...*maybe* if I'm being generous it would be one of the first 10 picks of the 2nd round. But calling it a "good 2nd rounder" when it's not even one of the first 10 picks in the 2nd round is a reach imo.
Not to mention that we've accumulated a million 2nd round picks over the past few yrs so losing these 2 2nd rounders is no big deal.
Especially on a team as deep and talented as the Celtics, any guy we use a 2nd round pick on (especially one that deep into the 2nd round) is a long shot to contribute anything.
It was certainly worth the gamble to take a flier on Springer, a former 1st round pick (who many felt was a a lottery level talent) already had 2.5 years of NBA experience but was still very young at age 21 rather than taking some guy in the mid 2nd round with no NBA experience who would probably not contribute anything anyways.
IMO, only way this ends up being an L is if Springer ends up becoming a really good player somewhere else in the next year or 2 and then we're all wishing that Brad kept him.
Not an L imo if a guy doesn't contribute much when all it took was a mid to late 2nd rounder or 2 to get/move him since picks that late in the draft rarely hit anyways.
Also, we do not win that Clippers game without Springer. He could've helped us win more games than that - Joe didn't play him, though. There was lots of games where an opposing guard was going off and we could've used Springer in there for a few mins to slow him down (losses this season vs CLE, OKC and Sixers on xmas, etc) so it's not really fair to give Brad an L when Joe is the one who didn't play him more. Perhaps partly Joe's fault, but might simply be the reality of having such a deep/talented roster that some guys just don't play as much.
And while we can't tell for sure, my guess is that he brought a lot of defensive intensity to practice to help push Tatum, Brown, Hauser, Pritchard, Jrue and White to become better offensive players.
Lastly, we get a $4mil TPE with the trade so let's wait and see if Brad ends up using that prior to the trade deadline..he might scoop up a pretty good player and then this won't look like an L for Brad.