Lauri Markkanen

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Astaluego
Starter
Posts: 2,394
And1: 907
Joined: May 02, 2020
   

Lauri Markkanen 

Post#1 » by Astaluego » Sun Feb 9, 2025 9:26 am

Lauri will turn 28 during this season...
This is the first year of his new 5-year contract. It starts at +-42 million which will increase to 53 in the 28/29 season.
He is having his best moment on a deep lottery team that is far from competing.
Since you are on a team that has no incentive to win, it will probably be difficult to stay 100% motivated and your performance could easily take a nosedive...
19.3 ppg/6.2reb/1.7 ast in shooting divisions
42%(fg)/35.1% (3p)/86.4(ft)

In this answer, I think the best thing for everyone would be if they moved him this summer. What teams do you think would be interested and what kind of offers would you make?
Old Mike Lorenzo
Astaluego
Starter
Posts: 2,394
And1: 907
Joined: May 02, 2020
   

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#2 » by Astaluego » Sun Feb 9, 2025 9:27 am

I think he would fit very well (at least on paper) with the Pistons/Hornets or Spurs
Old Mike Lorenzo
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 19,366
And1: 17,155
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#3 » by Mavrelous » Sun Feb 9, 2025 9:34 am

Harris,Ivey and Holland for Markannen
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Astaluego
Starter
Posts: 2,394
And1: 907
Joined: May 02, 2020
   

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#4 » by Astaluego » Sun Feb 9, 2025 10:41 am

Mavrelous wrote:Harris,Ivey and Holland for Markannen

I like that, Maybe (after the Pistons pay off their draft debt this summer) they send a future FRP and keep Ivey? Ivey was progressing this year with the PISTONS and the JAZZ don't really need him, they have their own prospects (Collier/K.George) this draft is loaded with good guards and they still have Sexton/Clarkson.... what's up..
Harris (possibly divert to 3 team?)/Holland+Fontecchio+Futuro FRP
Old Mike Lorenzo
User avatar
mcfly1204
General Manager
Posts: 9,911
And1: 2,558
Joined: Oct 31, 2008

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#5 » by mcfly1204 » Sun Feb 9, 2025 11:34 am

Mavrelous wrote:Harris,Ivey and Holland for Markannen

Add 3-4 1sts, and you're probably close.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,752
And1: 22,817
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#6 » by MotownMadness » Sun Feb 9, 2025 11:37 am

mcfly1204 wrote:
Mavrelous wrote:Harris,Ivey and Holland for Markannen

Add 3-4 1sts, and you're probably close.

Definitely not going that far but he should be a target for Detroit
bkohler
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,582
And1: 757
Joined: Jan 12, 2018
 

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#7 » by bkohler » Sun Feb 9, 2025 1:28 pm

I think it’ll be SAS for one of there two lottery picks this year and a pick in 26.
Astaluego
Starter
Posts: 2,394
And1: 907
Joined: May 02, 2020
   

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#8 » by Astaluego » Sun Feb 9, 2025 2:12 pm

bkohler wrote:I think it’ll be SAS for one of there two lottery picks this year and a pick in 26.

I think that for the SPURS it would be better to pursue his teammate Collins...first of all it would be more economically sustainable, if they want to keep their core...Vassell has already been paid, they will soon have to extend and raise Fox's salary,...Collins expires before they pay VW/Castle and they could surely renew him for less money...on the court Collins gives them more interior presence, a better rebounder and they can use him as a backup 5...he will also be cheaper to keep and they could keep him their next 2 lottery picks, which will probably be the last ones they have... after building a contender
Old Mike Lorenzo
HadAnEffectHere
Veteran
Posts: 2,735
And1: 1,506
Joined: May 19, 2023

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#9 » by HadAnEffectHere » Sun Feb 9, 2025 2:18 pm

Lauri's sucked this year and his contract is too enormous to risk giving up real stuff for. His value is currently an expiring and a pick in the teens so he won't be moved.
ReggiesKnicks
Veteran
Posts: 2,747
And1: 2,269
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#10 » by ReggiesKnicks » Sun Feb 9, 2025 2:55 pm

mcfly1204 wrote:
Mavrelous wrote:Harris,Ivey and Holland for Markannen

Add 3-4 1sts, and you're probably close.


I think this is a big overpay for someone like Lauri Markkanen who, as talented as he is, we haven't seen play in high-leverage situations, we haven't seen his offense schemed against in a playoff series and we haven't seen offenses scheme against him defensively.

For me the easy comparison is Siakam. Siakam was a player who is a similar caliber regular season player as Lauri, though better defender and playmaker, not quite the shooter, but also has proven to be a big-time playoff performer as a two-way second option.

The Siakam trade was 3 picks and filler salary (not expiring) and 2 of the picks were guaranteed to not be lottery when the future pick was Top 4 protected.

I think that's a good starting point for Lauri, where the unknowns of Lauri's skill-set and playoff ability could potentially be sold and off-set by his longer contract. I think the Pacers knew we were extending Siakam, so I don't actually think that matters here but I'm sure the Utah fan base will instantly point to that as the great divide.
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 19,366
And1: 17,155
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#11 » by Mavrelous » Sun Feb 9, 2025 3:02 pm

mcfly1204 wrote:
Mavrelous wrote:Harris,Ivey and Holland for Markannen

Add 3-4 1sts, and you're probably close.

That was the very high end valuation at his peak value, he lost a lot of value due to contract/play.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
HadAnEffectHere
Veteran
Posts: 2,735
And1: 1,506
Joined: May 19, 2023

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#12 » by HadAnEffectHere » Sun Feb 9, 2025 3:05 pm

No chance Lauri has Siakam's value last year at this point. Lauri has been significantly worse than John Collins this year, and no one wanted Collins on a 2/52 contract. If you trade for Lauri and he doesn't bounce back, you have destroyed your cap and you're completely screwed.

He's just not getting moved because his value has declined so much. He's worth an expiring and a pick in the teens and Ainge cannot do this.
ReggiesKnicks
Veteran
Posts: 2,747
And1: 2,269
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#13 » by ReggiesKnicks » Sun Feb 9, 2025 3:16 pm

San Antonio Spurs

On paper, a perfect fit next to Fox/Wemby. Fox/Castle/Vassell/Lauri/Wemby is terrific but the lack of size gives me pause that San Antonio fully commits here, though Sochan as this weird Dennis Rodman-lite player helps some of the physicality and size issues.

Barnes + Keldon + Filler + #10 + 2028 SAS 1st (Top 4 protected)

Even I have reservations about this for the Spurs, but the positives are clear. Taking advantage of Barnes + Keldon salary gets them in range for a star. The reservations were mentioned above, and building slowly like Boston did in the late 2010s and how OKC has done while drafting well and trusting your process makes a ton of sense before the asset drain begins around a young star (See Minnesota, but maybe ANT is just that good? Maybe Minnesota isn't a good example since they got to the WCF last year).

Detroit Pistons

Tobias + Filler + Young guys (Holland + Ivey) + 1 future 1st with light protection

Memphis

I don't really understand what they are doing. They need to be all-in around Ja since he is injury prone and isn't projected to have a long prime. Lauri is a great move the chips all-in move, but given how they acted this trade deadline, they don't seem to care about winning.

Memphis would also need to get creative with the salary matching, though the fit with Ja/Bane/3+D/Lauri/JJ is terrific.

Miami Heat

Talk about a dark horse. Lauri fits their timeline with Bam/Herro. Great fit next as a 4 next to Bam or Ware or at the 3.

Expiring in the form of some combination of Rozier + Robinson + SlowMo + GSW 2025 1st + Future 1st

OKC

I'll believe it when I see it. I don't think they want to commit salary to a player of Lauri's caliber when they need to pay Jdub and Chet.
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,051
And1: 3,370
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#14 » by SkyHook » Sun Feb 9, 2025 3:50 pm

I expect that, based on his new contract and the season he's had, the interest in him and the value of the inbound offers will be less than what they were last summer. Consequently I don't see him being moved.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
DonaldSanders
Head Coach
Posts: 7,169
And1: 9,262
Joined: Jan 22, 2012
   

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#15 » by DonaldSanders » Sun Feb 9, 2025 5:15 pm

Lauri's value is down now after performing worse than the prior year, and increasing in cost on the new contract. Ainge missed the boat if he wanted a trade, asked too much. If Utah wants to move him, this summer is not the time -- they need to do some winning and finding success for Lauri.
User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 16,726
And1: 8,620
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#16 » by K_chile22 » Sun Feb 9, 2025 5:19 pm

Jabari, Dillon and one pick
User avatar
Cappy_Smurf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,322
And1: 9,809
Joined: Apr 26, 2015
     

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#17 » by Cappy_Smurf » Sun Feb 9, 2025 5:33 pm

Utah held onto him because they hope to keep him long term, not because Ainge was looking for a better offer, so let's get that straight.

If Utah strikes gold in the lottery, everything will be going as planned. Fans underestimate how much these teams don't want to be stuck in a long-term rebuild. Some people see "proper tanking" as losing every game by 40 so you can be dead last, while I think most teams prefer to lose while being somewhat competitive. If Utah lucks into Flagg, I believe they will be done with tanking and will start operating as a team trying to make the playoffs.

If Utah whiffs on their pick this year, then we can start talking about possibly trading Lauri, but I don't think it's a given, as teams still have to think about selling tickets. A total teardown to lose every game by 40 makes it extremely difficult to sell tickets. Having a player like Lauri helps with that, even when the team is losing at a high rate.
New York said Mitchell wasn't the guy you trade the sink for, then they traded it for Mikal, lol.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,906
And1: 12,051
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#18 » by LightTheBeam » Sun Feb 9, 2025 6:09 pm

Id offer Lavine + a few picks from sacs end.
User avatar
LarsV8
RealGM
Posts: 10,142
And1: 5,446
Joined: Dec 13, 2009
       

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#19 » by LarsV8 » Sun Feb 9, 2025 6:11 pm

This guy seems like the PF version of Zach Lavine.
Image
AingesBurner
RealGM
Posts: 15,243
And1: 3,904
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
   

Re: Lauri Markkanen 

Post#20 » by AingesBurner » Sun Feb 9, 2025 6:35 pm

Not for sale.

Return to Trades and Transactions