JustBuzzin wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:JustBuzzin wrote:Why would he leave a well paid job?
This is a business move.
For as much as we blame Nico why aren't we giving the same energy to the Mavs owner who has the final say on this move?
Again the Mavs owner had to sign off on this. Why would he trade the bigger younger star for a aging AD?
It's not hard to see what happened behind the scenes. This was a move made for the entire league. The league had no superstar who could replace LeBron/Curry. Their best chance was to put Luka a international star in LA. The NBA got their next guy and his name is Luka and he plays in the best market for the most popular franchise in the league.
Wade told you what happened believe him.
The owner is just that. An owner. They are even known to not be basketball people. So they'll get left alone. Nico is supposed to be an expert. No fan base anywhere is going to want this guy there. It's a huge reputation issue. He'll be a joke in the community he lives in (do the owners even have a home in dallas?). I mean imagine your kids come home crying "daddy all the kids say you're an idiot for trading Luka". This isn't going to be a comfortable time for him in Dallas going forward.
And before all this, he was well respected. He'd have been able to get a new job no problem.
So you're telling me the Mavs owner didn't know Luka was an international superstar who was just entering his prime and the guy they were trading him for was a aging 32yr injury prone AD?
You're insulting the worlds basketball knowledge and you're also insulting all owners when you don't think they know who their top money maker is. Luka was Dallas money maker. The owner knew this was a bad trade and he signed off on it because the NBA as a whole had to do something about the ratings. You better believe these billionaires talk behind the scenes. This is just a hobby for them they make shady moves if it helps the business overall.
There is no reason to justify the Mavs owner signing off on this unless it was something shady happening behind the scenes point blank.
I'm stating there won't be blow back on an owner like a GM. I also think the whole LA conspiracy you're pitching is tinfoil hat level but that's another story.