TheEndIsNigh wrote:nomorezorro wrote:patryk7754 wrote:I think if we can replicate the Bears/Giants 2021 trade, that would make it significantly easier to trade for Garrett. If I remember correctly, the giants got a a 2021 5th and 2022 1st. If we can trade down and get a 2026 1st, we'd virtually be trading just one 1st. And if the Browns say we need to add a couple later picks to make up for trading back, i'd be completely fine with throwing in an extra 4th round pick or two. When trading for a HOF DE like Garrett, those later picks become virtually inconsequential. Obviously there would need to be some conditions met before pulling off a trade like that, specifically rebuilding the OL. But doing those three things, put us in a great position to win, I think.
Step 1: Spend 50m on the OL
Step 2: Trade back and add an extra 1st (giving us 2 in 2026)
Step 3: Trade 2025 1st and 2026 1st Garrett
nobody is going to trade a future first to move up to the #10 pick in this draft. when we traded up to 10, we were doing so for a QB that would likely go first overall in this class
Agreed. 10 is kind of a weird spot to be in in this draft. Jeanty is a blue chip, and will likely be there. But a team would really have to love him to trade up for him there. Other than that, we are outside the range for the top tier OL and DL, and probably too early for the second tier guys. I don't see much incentive for a team to trade up, and any of the positional need guys will probably feel like a reach. It doesn't look like it's going to be an exciting day 1 for us, but hopefully we come away with a contributor like the Wright draft.
there will be a OL or EDGE prospect available that won't be a reach. certainly an EDGE. i fear that poles will sign a starting EDGE in free agency and draft an OT who probably won't even play OT in the NFL. there is no blue chip OT in this draft and carter is the only blue chip EDGE